judyrecords
search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

Nevada Supreme/Appellate Court Record

CHISM DEVELOPMENT CO. VS. DISTRICT COURT

Case Information: 36606
Short Caption:CHISM DEVELOPMENT CO. VS. DISTRICT COURTCourt:Supreme Court
Lower Court Case(s):Clark Co. - Eighth Judicial District - A410196Classification:Original Proceeding - Civil - Mandamus
Disqualifications:Case Status:Disposition Filed/Case Closed
Replacement:Panel Assigned: Panel
To SP/Judge:SP Status:
Oral Argument:Oral Argument Location:
Submission Date:How Submitted:

+ Party Information

Docket Entries
DateTypeDescriptionPending?Document
08/21/2000Filing FeeReceived Filing Fee Paid on Filing. $200.00 from Lorber, Greenfield, Beddoe, Polito & Pengilly, LLP--check no. 9112
08/21/2000Notice/IncomingFiled Notice. Notice of Intent to File an Application for Writ of Mandamus. 00-14602
08/21/2000Petition/WritFiled Petition for Writ of Mandamus. and Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof. 00-14603
08/21/2000Notice/IncomingFiled Notice. Notice of Intent to File an Emergency Motion for Stay. 00-14604
08/21/2000MotionFiled Motion for Stay. Emergency Motion for Stay. 00-14605
08/21/2000Notice/IncomingFiled Proof of Service. Certificate of Mail Service. 00-14606
08/21/2000Notice/OutgoingIssued Notice of Procedural Deficiency. Affidavit of the party beneficially interested or the affidavit of petitioner's attorney. Due Date: 10 days
08/28/2000Petition/WritFiled Affidavit in Support of Petition for Writ. 00-15079
08/28/2000Notice/IncomingFiled Affidavit. Affidavit of Petitioner's Attorney in Support of Petitioner's Emergency Motion for Stay. 00-15081
09/20/2000Order/ProceduralFiled Order. Petitioner seeks a stay of the district court's order denying its motion to dismiss. We conclude that a stay of the district court's order is not warranted at this time. Nevertheless, having reviewed the petition, it appears that petitioner has set forth issues of arguable merit and that petitioner may have no plain, speedy and adequate remedy in the ordinary course of the law. Therefore, the real party in interest, on behalf of the respondents, shall have 30 days from the date of this order within which to file an answer, including authorities, against issuance of the requested writ. 00-16606
10/19/2000MotionFiled Motion to Extend Time. Real Party in Interest, Pleasant Hills Homeowners Association's Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer to Petition for Writ of Mandamus. 00-18598
10/26/2000Order/Clerk'sFiled Clerk's Order Granting Motion. Real party in interest Pleasant Hill Homeowners Association shall have to and including December 18, 2000, to file and serve an answer to the petition for writ of mandamus. 00-18980
12/14/2000MotionFiled Motion to Extend Time. Real Party in Interest, Pleasant Hills Homeowners Association's Second Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer to Petition for Writ of Mandamus. 00-21868
12/29/2000Order/ProceduralFiled Order/Motion Granted in Part. On December 14, 2000, the real party in interest filed a second motion for another 60-day extension of time, citing "heavy motion calendars, depositions, arbitration hearings, and the upcoming holidays." We conclude that these reasons are inadequate to justify an additional sixty days to file an answer. Instead, the real party in interest shall have to and including January 12, 2001, to file and serve its answer. No further extenions of time shall be granted absent extraordinary circumstances. 00-22715
01/16/2001Petition/WritFiled Answer to Petition for Writ. Real Party in Interest's Answering Brief on Behalf of Respondents re: Petition for Writ of Mandamus. 01-00886
01/16/2001AppendixFiled Appendix. Respondent's Appendix re: Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Mandamus. 01-00890
11/28/2001Order/ProceduralFiled Order. The clerk of the district court shall, within 10 days from the date of this order, certify and transmit to the clerk of this court the complete docket entries and minutes prepared in Eighth Judicial District Court Case No. A41096. 01-19877
12/17/2001MotionFiled Motion to Dismiss Petition. 01-21205
01/07/2002Order/DispositionalFiled Order Dismissing Petition. Dismissing Petition for Writ of Mandamus. On December 17, 2001, petitioner and the real party in interest filed a stipulation to dismiss the petition, as they have reached a settlement agreement. We approve the stipulation, and hereby "ORDER this petition DISMISSED." fn1[As stipulated, the parties shall each bear their own costs and fees, save for any fees that are due, which shall be paid by petitioner.] NNP02-MS/RR/NB 02-00327
01/07/2002Case Status Update Case Closed. No notice in lieu of remittitur issued.