judyrecords
search tips
750 million+
United States Court Cases

District Of Columbia Court Of Appeals Record

JEREMIAH A. MUNGO V. UNITED STATES

Case Information: 08-CO-0236
Short Caption:JEREMIAH A. MUNGO V. UNITED STATESClassification:Appeals - Criminal Other - Den. Of Post-Conviction Relief
Lead: 00-CF-0688 Consolidated: 00-CF-1145 , 08-CO-0236, 08-CO-0237
Superior Court or Agency Case Number:FEL4745-97Filed Date:03/05/2008

Opening Event Date:03/05/2008Case Status:Closed
Record Completed:04/18/2008Post-Decision Matter Pending:
Briefs Completed:01/26/2009
Argued/Submitted:06/26/2009
Disposition:Next Scheduled Action:
Mandate Issued:07/15/2010
Costs Waived

Party Information
Appellate RoleParty NameIFPAttorney(s)Arguing AttorneyE-Filer
AppellantJeremiah A. Mungo Y
Mindy A. DanielsYY
AppelleeUnited StatesN
Roy W. McLeese, IIINN
Chrisellen R. KolbYY

Events
Event DateStatusDescriptionResult
03/05/2008NOTICE OF APPEAL
04/15/2008RECORD INDEX
04/15/2008RECORD COPIES
04/15/2008SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD - #1 (151pgs/Wood) 6/26/06 proc.
04/15/2008SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD - #2 (115pgs/Pirfo) 6/27/06 proc.
04/15/2008SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD - #3 (55pgs/ Kaczorowski) 7/12/06 proc.
04/15/2008SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD - #4 (99pgs/Graybill) 7/20/06 proc
04/15/2008SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD - #5 (72pgs/Peterson/Hart) 8/18/06 proc.
04/18/2008ORDERED that the appellants' joint motion to supplement the record is granted to the extent that the documents were considered by the trial court in adjudicating the D.C. Code 23-110 motion. F/O, sua sponte, that appeals nos. 08-CO-236 and 08-CO-237 are consolidated with previously consolidated appeal nos. 00-CF-688 and 00-CF-1145 for all purposes herein. F/O that Donna L. Biderman, Esquire, is hereby appointed to represent appellant in appeal no. 08-CO-237 herein. F/O that Mindy A. Daniels, Esquire, is hereby appointed to represent appellant in appeal no. 08-CO-236 herein. F/O that the briefs of appellants addressing the issues raised in appeals nos. 08-CO-236 & 08-CO-237 shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and the brief of appellee shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 31. (ETW)
04/18/2008RECORD COMPLETED
05/23/2008APPELLANT'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF to 8/30/08 (Peete)
05/27/2008APPELLANT'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF until 7/28/08 (unopposed) (Mungo)dwm
06/06/2008 On consideration of appellant Lamont N. Peete's motion for an extension of time within which to file the brief, to which no opposition has been filed, and the unopposed motion of appellant Jeremiah Mungo for extension of time within which to file the brief, it is ORDERED that the motion of appellant Lamont N. Peete is granted and the brief shall be filed on or before September 2, 2008. ( M O R E )
06/06/2008ORD GRANT APLT JEREMIAH MUNGO'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF on or before July 28, 2008. (GP)
07/28/2008APPELLANT'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF until August 31, 2008 (no oppo) (Mungo)
07/30/2008 On consideration of appellant Jeremiah Mungo's unopposed motion for an extension of time within which to file the brief and limited appendix in appeal no. 08-CO-236, it is ORDERED that appellant Jeremiah Mungo's motion is granted and the brief and limited appendix in appeal no. 08-CO-236 shall be filed on or before August 31, 2008. Any further requests for extensions of time will be looked upon with disfavor and granted only upon a showing of good cause. (GP)
08/29/2008APPELLANT'S BRIEF (Peete) (08-CO-237)
08/29/2008APPENDIX (Peete)
09/02/2008APPELLANT'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF (Mungo) to September 8, 2008 (no oppo).
09/22/2008APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE BRIEF (no oppo) (Mungo).
09/22/2008RECEIVED Appellant's Brief (Mungo).
09/30/2008APPELLANT'S MOTION TO STRIKE - portions of brief (Pette)
10/08/2008ORDERED that appellant Jeremiah A. Mungo's motions are granted and the Clerk shall file the brief and limited appendix in appeal no. 08-CO-236. F/O that appellant Lamont Peet's motion is granted to the extent that appellant Peete shall file a corrected brief within 15 days from the date of this order. F/O that the brief of appellee shall be filed within 30 days from the date of this order. (ETW)
10/08/2008APPELLANT'S BRIEF in appeal 08-CO-236
10/08/2008APPENDIX in appeal no. 08-CO-236.
10/24/2008APPELLANT'S AMENDED/CORRECTED BRIEF (Peete) (see order of 10/8/08) (08CO237)
10/24/2008APPENDIX (attached to brief) (Amended) (08CO237 Peete)
11/07/2008APPELLEE'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF January 6, 2009
12/03/2008 On consideration of appellee's motion for an extension of time within which to file the brief, to which no opposition has been filed, it is ORDERED that the motion is granted and appellee's brief shall be filed on or before January 9, 2009. (GP)
01/09/2009APLE MOTION FOR LV TO FILE BRF IN EXCESS OF PAGES no oppo
01/09/2009RECEIVED - aple's brief
01/09/2009TMC - appellee's motion for leave to file (LODGED) brief in excess pages
01/26/2009 ORDERED that appellee's MOTION IS GRANTED and the Clerk SHALL FILE the LODGED SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF of appellee. It is FURTHER ORDERED that THESE APPEALS shall be scheduled for cosideration before a merits panel as soon as the calendar permits. (GLBRKG)
01/26/2009APPELLEE'S BRIEF (08CO236 & 08CO237)
01/26/2009BRIEFS COMPLETED
04/03/2009 It appearing that this appeal is likely to be calendared for argument during the month of June 2009, it is ORDERED that counsel shall advise this court in writing by April 20, 2009 of specific dates during that period when they are unavailable so that the court can attempt to avoid such dates in scheduling argument. Counsel must continue to advise the court of availabilities for subsequent months until this case is in fact set for argument. Note that the calendar is prepared approximately two months in advance, e.g. January calendar set for release at the end of November. The court does not encourage the filing of motions to postpone a scheduled argument. If you do seek a change in a scheduled argument date, your motion should both indicate the opponent's position with respect to your request and alternative dates when you and opposing counsel would be available. You may call the Calendar Clerk prior to filing such a motion for information on dates in the scheduled month when the courtroom is available.(aj) Garland Pinkston, Jr. Clerk
04/08/2009LETTER FROM COUNSEL/PARTY RE FUTURE CALENDARING
04/20/2009LETTER FROM COUNSEL/PARTY RE FUTURE CALENDARING aplt
05/07/2009CALENDAR NOTICE SENT
06/15/2009AMICUS CURIAE MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION for leave to file supplemental brief on aplt's confrontation clause claim (no oppo)
06/19/2009APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE REPLY BRIEF (Peete)
06/19/2009RECEIVED - aplt's reply brief (Peete)
06/19/2009APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE REPLY BRIEF (Mungo)
06/19/2009RECEIVED - aplt's reply brief (Mungo)
06/26/2009FiledACTION - Argued / Submitted
06/26/2009CERTIFICATE PER RULE 28
06/26/2009ARGUED before Judges Washington, Thompson, Nebeker Mindy A. Daniels, Esq. for appellant Donna L. Biderman, Esq. for appellant Chrisellen R. Kolb, Esq. for appellee
06/30/2009On consideration of the unopposed motion of the Public Defender Service as amicus curiae for leave to file a supplemental brief of appellants' confrontation clause claim, and it appearing that the Supreme Court issued its decision in no. 07-571, Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts, on June 25, 2009, it is ORDERED that the motion is granted to the extent that the parties are directed to file supplemental briefs addressing on the effect of the Melendez-Diaz opinion on the above captioned appeals. The supplementals brief of appellants and the Public Defender Service as amicus shall be filed within 30 days of the date of this order, and the supplemental brief of appellee within 30 days thereafter. (WH,TH,NE)
07/02/2009ORDER GRANT APLT MOTION FOR LV TO FILE REPLY BRIEF and the lodged reply briefs of Lamont Peete and Jeremiah Mungo is filed. (WH,TH,NE)
07/02/2009APPELLANT'S REPLY BRIEF (Peete)
07/02/2009APPELLANT'S REPLY BRIEF (Mungo)
07/17/2009AMICUS CURIAE'S BRIEF
07/30/2009APPELLANT'S SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF/MEMORANDUM (both)
08/31/2009APPELLEE'S SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF/MEMORANDUM
01/28/2010AFFIRMED Opinion (Washington, Thompson, Nebeker) and Judgment affirming the judgments on appeal.
02/17/2010APLT MO TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE PET FOR REH/REH EB to 4/2/10 both aplts
02/22/2010ORD GRT APLT MO TO EXT TM TO FL PET FOR REH/REH EB on or before April 2, 2010. (WH) (of Mungo and Peete)
02/23/2010APLT'S PETITION FOR REHEARING/REHEARING EN BANC (Mungo).
04/02/2010APLT'S PETITION FOR REHEARING/REHEARING EN BANC (Peete and Mungo)
04/08/2010ORD DENY APPELLANT'S PETITION FOR REH/REH EN BANC (pro se petition) (WHRZRDGLKRBRTHOBNE) (Judge Fisher is recused from this case.) (of Mungo)
07/07/2010ORD DENY APPELLANT'S PETITION FOR REH/REH EN BANC (WHRZRDGLKRBRTHOBNE) (Judge Fisher is recused from this case.) (of Peete and Mungo)
07/15/2010MANDATE ISSUED
10/08/2010RECEIVED- motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed in supreme court
12/02/2010NOTICE OF FILING A PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI
01/12/2011NOTICE OF DENIAL OF PET. FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI
03/09/2011NOTICE OF FILING A PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI
04/05/2011MOTION TO RECALL THE MANDATE (Appellant's). Denied
04/08/2011TMC - motion to recall mandate (PEETE)
06/22/2011 ORDERED that APPELLANT'S MOTION TO RECALL THE MANDATE IS DENIED. The issues raised by appellant appellant were addressed and rejected in this court's opinion affirming his convictions and appellant failed to demonstrate that appellate counsel was constitutionally ineffective... (WHTHNB)
08/05/2011LodgedMotion For Extension Of Time to File Petition for Rehearing to Recall the Mandate (Appellant)