judyrecords
search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

District Of Columbia Court Of Appeals Record

MONICA R. REED V. PRIDE INDUSTRIES

Case Information: 05-AA-1478
Short Caption:MONICA R. REED V. PRIDE INDUSTRIESClassification:Agency - Administrative Agency - Employment Services
Superior Court or Agency Case Number:ESP102733-05Filed Date:12/28/2005

Opening Event Date:12/28/2005Case Status:Closed
Record Completed:08/02/2007Post-Decision Matter Pending:
Briefs Completed:
Argued/Submitted:
Disposition:Next Scheduled Action:
Mandate Issued:11/14/2007
Costs Waived

Party Information
Appellate RoleParty NameIFPAttorney(s)Arguing AttorneyE-Filer
PetitionerMonica R. Reed YPro SeN
RespondentPride IndustriesN

Events
Event DateStatusDescriptionResult
12/28/2005PETITION FOR REVIEW (nunc pro tunc)
12/28/2005PETITIONER'S MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
01/13/2006ORDER GRANT PTNR MO TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, and the Clerk shall file the lodged petition for review nunc pro tunc to December 28, 2005. It is F/ORDERED that the Office of Administrative Hearings shall file the administrative record within 60 days from the date of this order. See D.C. App. R. 17. If a hearing was held, the record should include either a certified copy of the transcript of any testimony before the agency or a certified narrative statement of relevant proceedings and evidence in accordance with D.c. App. R. 16 (A)(4). It is F/ORDERED that Pride Industries shall w/in 15 days from the date of this order advise this court as to the identity of its counsel. See Moore Energy Resources, Inc. v. Public Serv. Comm'n of the District of Columbia, 785 A.2d 300, 304 (d.C. 2001); D.C. App. R. 15 (a)(5). (ETW)
01/13/2006CERTIFIED COPY OF PETITION TO BOARD and Michael A. Milwee.
07/21/2006On consideration of the court's order of January 13, 2006, directing respondent to identify its counsel within 15 days from the date of the order, and it appearing that respondent has filed to comply with the order, it is ORDERED that respondent shall within 10 calendar days from the date of this order advise this court as to the identity of its counsel. See Moore Energy Resources, Inc. v. Public Serv. Comm'n of the DC, 785 A.2d 300, 304 (DC 2001); DC App. R. 159a)(5). Failure to comply with this order shall result in respondent being prohibited from filingits brief. (ETW)
08/14/2006LETTER - from respondent re: counsel (will not be retaining counsel)
09/25/2006 On consideration of respondent's letter, in response to this court's order of July 21, 2006, which directed respondent to identify its counsel, wehrein respondent states that it does not intend to retain cousnel, and it appearing that the record on appeal has not yet been filed with this court, it is ORDERED that the OAH shall file the administrative record within 30 days from the date of this order. See D.C. App. r. 17. It is F/O that this matter shall be submitted for decision on the record and on petitioner's brief alone. (ETW)
08/02/2007RECORD ON APPEAL w/transcript
08/02/2007RECORD COMPLETED
08/08/2007 It appearing that the complete record on appeal has been filed with this court, it is ORDERED that petitioner's brief and the limited appendix, as required by D.C. App. R. 30(f), shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and respondent's brief shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 30, 31. (GP)
09/21/2007 On consideration of this court's order of August 8, 2007, directing petitioner to file the brief, and the limited appendix, as required by D.C.App. R. 30 (f), within 40 days from the date of the order, and it appearing that the brief and the appendix have not been filed, it is ORDERED that the brief of petitioner and the limited appendix shall be submitted within 20 days from the date of this order, accompanied by a motion for leave to file the documents out of time. The motion should set forth good cause for the failure either to timely file the documents or to request an extension of time within which to do so. Failure to comply with this order shall subject this petition for review to dismissal without further notice. See D.C. App. R. 13. (GP)
10/22/2007ORDER: This appeal is hereby dismissed. See D.C. App. R. 13. (By: ETW)
10/22/2007DISMISSED
11/14/2007MANDATE ISSUED