judyrecords
search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

District Of Columbia Court Of Appeals Record

RODERICK L. STRANGE V. UNITED STATES

Case Information: 08-CF-0353
Short Caption:RODERICK L. STRANGE V. UNITED STATESClassification:Appeals - Criminal Felony - Assault Related
Superior Court or Agency Case Number:CF2-20868-07Filed Date:03/19/2008

Opening Event Date:03/19/2008Case Status:Closed
Record Completed:07/30/2008Post-Decision Matter Pending:
Briefs Completed:01/09/2009
Argued/Submitted:06/04/2009
Disposition:Next Scheduled Action:
Mandate Issued:08/05/2009
Costs Waived

Party Information
Appellate RoleParty NameIFPAttorney(s)Arguing AttorneyE-Filer
AppellantRoderick L. Strange Y
Ian A. WilliamsYY
AppelleeUnited StatesN
Roy W. McLeese, IIINN
Erin L. Walsh NN
Mary B. Mccord YN

Events
Event DateStatusDescriptionResult
03/19/2008NOTICE OF APPEAL
04/21/2008 On consideration of the notice of appeal and it appearing that appellant has been found eligible for court appointed counsel, it is ORDERED that Ian A. Williams, Esquire, is hereby appointed to represent appellant in this appeal. It is FURTHER ORDERED that counsel for appellant shall immediately take the necessary steps to review the trial court record and to ensure that the transcripts necessary to the appeal have been ordered and shall, within 30 days from the date of this order complete and file with this court a single copy of the attached statement regarding the transcript ordered for this appeal. Where transcript(s) necessary for this appeal have been ordered and completed for non-appeal purposes, appellant must advise the Court Reporting and Recording Division to forward said transcript(s) for inclusion in the record on appeal. (GP)
04/21/2008APPOINTING COUNSEL/COURT ORDER REFERRAL (CJA) Ian A. Williams, Esquire
05/20/2008STATEMENT REGARDING TRANSCRIPT(S)` (RT ordered/needed (pii))
07/25/2008SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD #1 (6-pgs/bennett 12/17/07 proc.)
07/25/2008SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD #2 (524-pgs/tape 12/17-21/07 proc.)
07/30/2008SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD #3 (7-pgs/tape 2/29/08)
07/30/2008SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD #4 (25-pgs/tape 3/11/08)
07/30/2008RECORD COMPLETED
07/30/2008 It appearing that the complete record on appeal has been filed with this court, it is ORDERED that appellant's brief and the limited appendix including the documents required by D.C. App. R. 30 (f), shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and appellee's brief shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 31. (GP)
09/10/2008APPELLANT'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF until October 24, 2008 (no oppo)
09/17/2008 On consideration of appellant's motion for an extension of time within which to file the brief, to which no opposition has been filed, it is ORDERED that the motion is granted, and appellant's brief and the limited appendix shall be filed on or before October 24, 2008. (GP)
09/29/2008RECORD COPIES
09/29/2008RECORD INDEX
10/24/2008RECEIVED pro se letter, from Appellant, regarding lack of representation from court-appointed counsel.
10/28/2008LETTER referring to counsel for appellant the Oct. 24 pro se letter from appellant. (JAC)
10/31/2008 On consideration of this court's order of September 17, 2008, granting appellant's motion for an extension of time to file the brief and limited appendix on or before October 24, 2008, and it appearing that the brief and limited appendix have not been filed, it is ORDERED that counsel for appellant shall within 20 days from the date of this order, submit the brief and the limited appendix, accompanied by a motion for leave to file the documents out of time. The motion shall set forth good cause for the failure either to fimely file the documents or to request and extension of time within which to do so. (GP)
11/10/2008APPELLANT'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF until December 10, 2008 (no oppo)
11/13/2008 On consideration of appellant's motion for an extension of time within which to file the brief, to which no opposition has been filed, it is ORDERED that the motion is granted and appellant's brief and the limited appendix shall be filed on or before December 10, 2008. Any further requests for extensions of time will be looked upon with disfavor and granted only upon a showing of good cause. (GP)
12/05/2008APPELLANT'S BRIEF
12/05/2008APPENDIX
01/09/2009APPELLEE'S BRIEF
01/09/2009BRIEFS COMPLETED
02/01/2009FINAL SCREENING - SUMMARY CALENDAR I
03/26/2009RECEIVED pro se correspondence, from Appellant, regarding lack of response from court-appointed counsel and ineffective assistance of counsel.
03/30/2009LETTER referring to counsel for appellant the March 26 correspondence received from appellant. (JAC)
05/07/2009CALENDAR NOTICE SENT
05/20/2009APPELLANT'S MOTION REQUESTING ORAL ARGUMENT
05/21/2009LETTER TO COUNSEL GRANTING REQUEST TO ARGUE (JAC)
06/01/2009MEMORANDUM of subsitution of counsel for aple Atty McCord will argue in place of Attu Walsh.
06/04/2009FiledACTION - Argued / Submitted
06/04/2009ARGUED before Judges Glickman, Kramer, Oberly Ian A. Williams, Esq. for appellant Mary B. McCord, Esq. for appellee
07/13/2009AFFIRMED MOJ (Glickman, Kramer, Oberly)
08/05/2009MANDATE ISSUED
09/02/2009MOTION TO RECALL THE MANDATE (Appellant's). Denied
09/09/2009On consideration of appellant's pro se motion to recall the mandate, it is ORDERED that appellant's counsel is directed to file within 30 days from the date of this order a response to the motion. It is FURTHER ORDERED that appellant's pro se motion to recall the mandate is hereby held in abeyance pending the response of counsel for appellant. (GL,KR,OB)
10/14/2009APPELLANT'S ANSWER/RESPONSE (response of counsel for aplt to court's order of 9/9/09)
10/29/2009ORD DENYING MOTION TO RECALL MANDATE (GL,KR,OB)
11/20/2009APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION of court's order dated October 29, 2009.
01/05/2010CHANGE OF ADDRESS RECEIVED, from Appellant: Roderick L. Strange#40226-007 Unit D-5, Rivers Correctional Institute P.O. Box 630Winton, NC 27986
01/25/2010ORDER On consideration of appellant's pro se motion for reconsideration for this court's order dated October 29, 2009, which denied appellant's motion to recall the mandate, it is ORDERED that appellant's pro se motion for reconsideration to recall the mandate is denied. (GL,KR,OB)
04/21/2014FiledArchived