Case Information: 07-AA-0052 | |||
Short Caption: | JOSEPH W. LATTISAW V. DC POLICE & FIREFIGHTERS RET&RLF BD. | Classification: | Agency - Administrative Agency - Police/Fire Retire/Relief Bd. |
Superior Court or Agency Case Number: | PD1061-05 | Filed Date: | 02/12/2007 |
| |||
Opening Event Date: | 02/12/2007 | Case Status: | Closed |
Record Completed: | 03/05/2007 | Post-Decision Matter Pending: | |
Briefs Completed: | 05/16/2007 | ||
Argued/Submitted: | |||
Disposition: | Next Scheduled Action: | ||
Mandate Issued: | 06/23/2008 |
Party Information | ||||||||||||
Appellate Role | Party Name | IFP | Attorney(s) | Arguing Attorney | E-Filer | |||||||
Petitioner | Joseph W. Lattisaw | N |
| |||||||||
Respondent | D.C. Police & Firefighters' Retirement & Relief Board | N |
|
Events | ||||
Event Date | Status | Description | Result | |
02/12/2007 | PETITION FOR REVIEW | |||
02/12/2007 | FILING FEE of $100.00. | |||
02/12/2007 | CERTIFIED COPY OF PETITION TO BOARD and Todd Kim, Esq. | |||
03/05/2007 | RECORD ON APPEAL | |||
03/05/2007 | RECORD COMPLETED | |||
03/06/2007 | It appearing that the complete record on appeal has been filed with this court, it is ORDERED that petitioner's brief and the appendix shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and respondent's brief shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 30, 31. (GP) | |||
04/11/2007 | PETITIONER'S BRIEF | |||
04/11/2007 | APPENDIX - petitioner | |||
05/16/2007 | RESPONDENT'S BRIEF w/ supplemental appendix | |||
05/16/2007 | BRIEFS COMPLETED | |||
05/30/2007 | PETITIONER'S MOTION TO STRIKE - respondent's brief and supplemental appendix | |||
06/01/2007 | FINAL SCREENING - REGULAR CALENDAR | |||
06/04/2007 | RESPONDENT'S OPPOSITION - to petitioner's motion to strike | |||
06/07/2007 | ORDER DENYING PETITIONER MOTION TO STRIKE | |||
10/19/2007 | It appearing that this appeal is likely to be calendared for argument during the months of January 2008 thru March 2008, it is ORDERED that counsel shall advise this court in writing by November 21, 2007 of specific dates during that period when they are unavailable so that the court can attempt to avoid such dates in scheduling argument. Counsel must continue to advise the court of availabilities for subsequent months until this case is in fact set for argument. Note that the calendar is prepared approximately two months in advance, e.g. January calendar set for release at the end of November. The court does not encourage the filing of motions to postpone a scheduled argument. If you do seek a change in a scheduled argument date, your motion should both indicate the opponent's position with respect to your request and alternative dates when you and opposing counsel would be available. You may call the Calendar Clerk prior to filing such a motion for information on dates in the scheduled month when the courtroom is available.(aj) Garland Pinkston, Jr. Clerk | |||
10/29/2007 | LETTER FROM COUNSEL/PARTY RE FUTURE CALENDARING petitioner | |||
12/20/2007 | CALENDAR NOTICE SENT | |||
01/07/2008 | PETITIONER'S MOTION TO POSTPONE/CONTINUE ARGUMENT | |||
01/10/2008 | LETTER FROM COUNSEL/PARTY RE FUTURE CALENDARING petitioner's | |||
01/11/2008 | On consideration of petitioner's motion to re-schedule oral argument, and it appearing that this matter is scheduled on the Regular Calendar of February 5, 2008, it is ORDERED on behalf of the merits division assigned to consider this matter that the motion is granted, and this matter is removed from the calendar of February 5, 2008, and re-scheduled for argument as a special sitting on the Regular Calendar on February 29, 2008, at 9:30 a.m. The parties are to be present in the District of Columbia Court of Appeals courtroom, located on the sixth floor, at 9:20 a.m. on that date. (GP) | |||
02/26/2008 | CERTIFICATE PER RULE 28 | |||
02/27/2008 | PETITIONER'S MOTION TO POSTPONE/CONTINUE ARGUMENT (no oppo) | |||
02/28/2008 | On consideration of petitioner consent motion to reschedule oral argument, it is ORDERED that the motion is granted and this appeal is removed from the regular calendar of February 29, 2008. The Clerk is directed to schedule this matter for argument before this division as a special sitting as soon as the calendar permits. (FA,KR,BE) | |||
05/29/2008 | ORDER - It is ORDERED, sua sponte, that this case is hereby remanded to the Police and Firefighters' Retirement and Relief Board for further consideration in light of this court's opinion in McCamey v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services, No. 04-AA-211, May 15, 2008, 2008 WL 204 8001. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the order on review is vacated to the extent that its failure to provide petitioner with additional benefits was based upon the body of law rejected by this court in McCamey, supra. (FA,KR,BE) | |||
05/29/2008 | LETTER FROM COUNSEL/PARTY RE FUTURE CALENDARING petitioner' | |||
05/29/2008 | REMANDED | |||
06/23/2008 | MANDATE ISSUED | |||
08/10/2011 | Filed | Archived |