judyrecords
search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

District Of Columbia Court Of Appeals Record

JOSEPH W. LATTISAW V. DC POLICE & FIREFIGHTERS RET&RLF BD.

Case Information: 07-AA-0052
Short Caption:JOSEPH W. LATTISAW V. DC POLICE & FIREFIGHTERS RET&RLF BD.Classification:Agency - Administrative Agency - Police/Fire Retire/Relief Bd.
Superior Court or Agency Case Number:PD1061-05Filed Date:02/12/2007

Opening Event Date:02/12/2007Case Status:Closed
Record Completed:03/05/2007Post-Decision Matter Pending:
Briefs Completed:05/16/2007
Argued/Submitted:
Disposition:Next Scheduled Action:
Mandate Issued:06/23/2008

Party Information
Appellate RoleParty NameIFPAttorney(s)Arguing AttorneyE-Filer
PetitionerJoseph W. LattisawN
Henry E. Weil YN
RespondentD.C. Police & Firefighters' Retirement & Relief BoardN
Todd S. KimNY
Richard S. LoveYY

Events
Event DateStatusDescriptionResult
02/12/2007PETITION FOR REVIEW
02/12/2007FILING FEE of $100.00.
02/12/2007CERTIFIED COPY OF PETITION TO BOARD and Todd Kim, Esq.
03/05/2007RECORD ON APPEAL
03/05/2007RECORD COMPLETED
03/06/2007 It appearing that the complete record on appeal has been filed with this court, it is ORDERED that petitioner's brief and the appendix shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and respondent's brief shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 30, 31. (GP)
04/11/2007PETITIONER'S BRIEF
04/11/2007APPENDIX - petitioner
05/16/2007RESPONDENT'S BRIEF w/ supplemental appendix
05/16/2007BRIEFS COMPLETED
05/30/2007PETITIONER'S MOTION TO STRIKE - respondent's brief and supplemental appendix
06/01/2007FINAL SCREENING - REGULAR CALENDAR
06/04/2007RESPONDENT'S OPPOSITION - to petitioner's motion to strike
06/07/2007ORDER DENYING PETITIONER MOTION TO STRIKE
10/19/2007 It appearing that this appeal is likely to be calendared for argument during the months of January 2008 thru March 2008, it is ORDERED that counsel shall advise this court in writing by November 21, 2007 of specific dates during that period when they are unavailable so that the court can attempt to avoid such dates in scheduling argument. Counsel must continue to advise the court of availabilities for subsequent months until this case is in fact set for argument. Note that the calendar is prepared approximately two months in advance, e.g. January calendar set for release at the end of November. The court does not encourage the filing of motions to postpone a scheduled argument. If you do seek a change in a scheduled argument date, your motion should both indicate the opponent's position with respect to your request and alternative dates when you and opposing counsel would be available. You may call the Calendar Clerk prior to filing such a motion for information on dates in the scheduled month when the courtroom is available.(aj) Garland Pinkston, Jr. Clerk
10/29/2007LETTER FROM COUNSEL/PARTY RE FUTURE CALENDARING petitioner
12/20/2007CALENDAR NOTICE SENT
01/07/2008PETITIONER'S MOTION TO POSTPONE/CONTINUE ARGUMENT
01/10/2008LETTER FROM COUNSEL/PARTY RE FUTURE CALENDARING petitioner's
01/11/2008On consideration of petitioner's motion to re-schedule oral argument, and it appearing that this matter is scheduled on the Regular Calendar of February 5, 2008, it is ORDERED on behalf of the merits division assigned to consider this matter that the motion is granted, and this matter is removed from the calendar of February 5, 2008, and re-scheduled for argument as a special sitting on the Regular Calendar on February 29, 2008, at 9:30 a.m. The parties are to be present in the District of Columbia Court of Appeals courtroom, located on the sixth floor, at 9:20 a.m. on that date. (GP)
02/26/2008CERTIFICATE PER RULE 28
02/27/2008PETITIONER'S MOTION TO POSTPONE/CONTINUE ARGUMENT (no oppo)
02/28/2008On consideration of petitioner consent motion to reschedule oral argument, it is ORDERED that the motion is granted and this appeal is removed from the regular calendar of February 29, 2008. The Clerk is directed to schedule this matter for argument before this division as a special sitting as soon as the calendar permits. (FA,KR,BE)
05/29/2008ORDER - It is ORDERED, sua sponte, that this case is hereby remanded to the Police and Firefighters' Retirement and Relief Board for further consideration in light of this court's opinion in McCamey v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services, No. 04-AA-211, May 15, 2008, 2008 WL 204 8001. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the order on review is vacated to the extent that its failure to provide petitioner with additional benefits was based upon the body of law rejected by this court in McCamey, supra. (FA,KR,BE)
05/29/2008LETTER FROM COUNSEL/PARTY RE FUTURE CALENDARING petitioner'
05/29/2008REMANDED
06/23/2008MANDATE ISSUED
08/10/2011FiledArchived