Events |
Event Date | Status | Description | Result |
12/19/2008 | | NOTICE OF APPEAL | |
01/15/2009 | | On consideration of the notice of appeal filed in this case on December 19, 2008, and it appearing that no transcript is needed for this appeal, it is ORDERED that a briefing order will be issued upon the filing in this court, by the Clerk of the Superior Court, of the record index in accordance with D.C. App. R. 11 (b)(3)(A). (GP) elp | |
02/05/2009 | | RECORD INDEX | |
02/05/2009 | | SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD #1 (exbibits envelope (1-5) | |
02/05/2009 | | RECORD COMPLETED | |
02/09/2009 | | It appearing that the complete record on appeal has been filed with this court, it is ORDERED that appellant's brief and the appendix including the documents required by D.C. App. R. 30 (a)(1), shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and appellee's briefs shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App.R. 31. (GP) elp | |
03/18/2009 | | APPELLANT'S BRIEF | |
03/18/2009 | | APPENDIX to Appellant's Brief. | |
03/27/2009 | | APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY REVERSAL | |
03/30/2009 | | TMC - motion for summary reversal - opposition | |
04/20/2009 | | APPELLEE'S OPPOSITION - to motion for summary reversal | |
04/24/2009 | | ORDERED that APPELLANT'S MOTION IS DENIED. Because the underlying facts are unclear, summary disposition is not appropriate. Oliver T. Carr Mgm't, Inc. v. Nat'l Delicatessen, Inc., 397 A.2d 914, 915 (D.C. 1979). It is FURTHER ORDERED that appellees' briefs will be filed w/n 30 days from the date of this order. (GLKRKG) | |
04/28/2009 | | APPELLANT'S MOTION TO STRIKE-illegitmate aple's oppo to motion for summary reversal and any brief filed herein the same ****CONSTRUED AS REPLY TO APPELLEE'S OPPOSITION **************SEE 4/30/09 ORDER LW | |
04/30/2009 | | On consideration of apellant's pro se Motion To Srike appelee's opposition to appellant's Motion For Summary Reversal, which this court CONSTRUES AS A REPLY TO APPELLEE'S OPPOSITION, and this court's April 24, 2009, order which denied the Motion for Summary Reversal, it is ORDERED that the briefs of appellees remain due on or before May 26, 2009. (BY: GP) lw | |
05/01/2009 | | LETTER- from aplt re: case on appeal | |
05/26/2009 | | APPELLEE'S BRIEF (Towarnicky) | |
05/27/2009 | | APPENDIX - submitted by Appellee Towarnicky | |
06/03/2009 | | It appearing that appellant's brief and the appendix were filed with this court on March 18, 2009, and it appearing that appellee Ronald S. Deutsch's brief was due to be filed with this court on or before May 26, 2009, and it appearing that the brief has not been filed, it is ORDERED that appellee Ronald S. Deutsch shall, within 15 days from the date of this order, submit the brief, accompanied by a motion for leave to file out of time. The motion should set forth good cause for the failure either to timely file the brief or to request an extension of time within which to do so. Failure to comply with this order shall subject this appeal to being scheduled for consideration the record and on appellate briefs on file. (GP) elp | |
06/03/2009 | | APPELLANT'S REPLY BRIEF | |
06/24/2009 | | On consideration of this court's order of June 3, 2009, which directed appellee Ronald S. Deutsch to file his brief, accompanied by a motion for leave to file out of time within 15 days from the date of the order, but it appearing that the brief has not yet been filed, it is ORDERED that this appeal shall be scheduled for consideration before a merits division of this court on the record and on the appellate briefs on file. (ETW) elp | |
06/24/2009 | | BRIEFS COMPLETED | |
06/29/2009 | | APPELLANT'S MOTION TO STRIKE aple's brief. | |
07/01/2009 | | TMC - appellant's motion to strike brief | |
07/08/2009 | | On considertation of appellant's motion to strike appellees' brief, to which no response has been filed, it is Ordered that appellant's motion is hereby assigned to the merits division for its consideration upon assignment. (RZGLTE) | |
07/10/2009 | | APPELLEE'S MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION-for procedural order, motion to file response in oppo to aplt's motion out of time, and motion for supplementation of the record (dwm) (James M. Towarnicky) | |
07/15/2009 | | APPELLANT'S OPPOSITION- to aple's motion for procedural motion, motion to file response to aplt's motion out of time and motion for supplemention of the record | |
07/17/2009 | | APPELLEE'S REPLY to oppo to aple's mot for pro- cedural order, mot to file response in oppo to aplt's mot out-of-time, and mot for supp of the record. | |
07/17/2009 | | APPELLEE'S MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION for additional procedural order. | |
07/21/2009 | | FINAL SCREENING - SUMMARY CALENDAR I | |
07/24/2009 | | APPELLANT'S OPPOSITION to aple's procedural motion. | |
07/24/2009 | | APPELLANT'S ANSWER/RESPONSE to aple's reply to oppo to aple's mot for a procedural motion, mot to file response to aplt's mot out of time, and motion for supplementation of the record. | |
07/28/2009 | | On considerationof appellees' motion for procedural order, motion to file opposition to appellant's motion out of time, and motion to supplement the record, the opposition, the response and reply thereto, and appellee's motion for additional procedural order, and the opposition thereto, it is ORDERED that appellees' motion is granted to the extent that appellee's brief filed with this court on May 26, 2009, is deemed filed on behalf of appellees Ronald S. Deutsch and James Towarnicky. It is FURTHER ORDERED that this court's order of June 24, 2009, which stated appellee Ronald S. Deutsch failed to file his brief is hereby vacatedand appellee's may file a table of contents. It is (MORE) | |
07/28/2009 | | FURTHER ORDERED that appellees' second motion for procedural order is construed as a motion for leave to late file response to appellant's motion to strike is granted and appellees' response shall be filed within 20 days from the date of this order and shall be referred to the merits division upon assignment. (ETW) elp | |
08/17/2009 | | MISCELLANEOUS - aple's table of contents to aple's appdx | |
08/17/2009 | | APPELLEES OPPOSITION - to aplt's motion to strike illegitmate aples opposition to motion for summary reversal and any briefs filed herein by same | |
12/02/2009 | | CALENDAR NOTICE SENT | |
12/28/2009 | | ORDER DENYING APPELLANT MOTION TO STRIKE (GP) | |
01/14/2010 | Filed | ACTION - Argued / Submitted | |
01/14/2010 | | SUBMITTED to Judges Fisher, Blackburne-Rigsby, King | |
04/15/2010 | | AFFIRMED MOJ (Fisher, Blackburne-Rigsby, King) | |
04/28/2010 | | APLT MO TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE PET FOR REHEARING to 5/7/10 | |
04/28/2010 | | APPELLANT'S MOTION TO STRIKE - all pleadings filed herein by the aples for lack of standing motion for impose sanctions on the aples for falsely asserting to this court that they had standing and to vacate this court's 4/15/10 opinion and grant aplt either summary and/or default reversal | |
04/29/2010 | | RECEIVED - aplt's petition for rehearing | |
04/30/2010 | | APLT MO TO EXTEND TIME TO FL PETITION FOR REH/EB (amended) w/leave to exceed page length | |
05/10/2010 | | ORDER grant aplt's motion for leave to file lodged pet for rehearing and the Clerk is directed to file the lodged petition. FURTHER ORDERED that aplt's amended mo. to extend time to file pet for reh en banc is granted and aplt's pet for reh en banc shall be filed on or before May 14, 2010. FURTHER ORDERED that aplt's motion to exceed page length for pet for reh en banc is denied. FURTHER ORDERED that aplt's motion to strike all pleadings filed by appellees, motion to impose sanctions on appellees, and to vacate this court's April 15, 2010, opinion and grant either summary and/or default reversal is denied. (WH) | |
05/10/2010 | | APPELLANT'S PETITION FOR REHEARING | |
05/14/2010 | | APPELLANT'S PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC | |
07/28/2010 | | ORD DENY APPELLANT'S PETITION FOR REH/REH EN BANC (pet for rehearing and pet for rehearing en banc) (WHRZRDGLKRFIBRTHOBKG) | |
08/05/2010 | | MANDATE ISSUED | |
10/18/2010 | | RECEIVED - Pro Se Appellant's Motion to Vacate All Judgment and for Leave to Re-Submit Amended Brief | |
11/10/2010 | | On consideration of appellant's motion to vacate all judgements, leave to re-submit amended brief, abuse of the judicial process, professional misconduct, etc., it is ORDERED that the motion is denied without prejudice to whatever motion appellant might file in the trial court. (FI,B-R,KG) | |