judyrecords
search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

District Of Columbia Court Of Appeals Record

MICHAEL ANTHONY V. OKIE DOKIE, INC., ET AL.

Case Information: 07-CV-0134
Short Caption:MICHAEL ANTHONY V. OKIE DOKIE, INC., ET AL.Classification:Appeals - Civil - Other Civil
Superior Court or Agency Case Number:CAB5836-04Filed Date:02/01/2007

Opening Event Date:02/01/2007Case Status:Closed
Record Completed:07/19/2007Post-Decision Matter Pending:
Briefs Completed:11/15/2007
Argued/Submitted:10/02/2008
Disposition:Next Scheduled Action:
Mandate Issued:08/24/2009
Costs Waived

Party Information
Appellate RoleParty NameIFPAttorney(s)Arguing AttorneyE-Filer
AppellantMichael Anthony N
Albert Lechner NN
Jack A. GoldYY
AppelleeOkie Dokie IncN
Angela W. RussellYN
James C. MehiganYN
AppelleeInk Reinforcement Agency IncYPro SeN

Events
Event DateStatusDescriptionResult
02/01/2007NOTICE OF APPEAL
03/14/2007 On consideration of the notice of appeal, and it appearing that appellant has not tendered the $100 filing fee, it is ORDERED that appellant shall tender the $100 fee within 10 calendar days from the date of this order. Failure to comply with this order shall subject this appeal to dismissal without further notice. See D.C. App. R. 13. (GP) elp
03/16/2007APPELLANT'S ANSWER/RESPONSE - to court order, fee paid in superior court on 3/16/07.
03/21/2007 It appearing that appellant has complied with this court's order of March 16, 2007, and on consideration of the notice of appeal, and it appearing that transcript is needed for this appeal, and it further appearing that appellee Ink Reinforcement Agency, Ink., is a business that must be represented by counsel, it is ORDERED that appellant shall within 20 days from the date of this order complete and file with this court a single copy of the attached statement regarding transcript. Where transcript(s) necessary for this appeal have been ordered and completed for non-appeal purposes, appellant must advise the Court Reporting Division to forward said transcript(s) for inclusion in the record on appeal. It partial transcripts are being ordered, appellant must file a statement of issues to be presented with this court within 10 days from the date of this order. See D.C. App. R. 10 (b)(3)(A). It is FURTHER ORDERED that appellant's failure to respond to any order of this court, including this order, shall subject this appeal to dismissal without further notices for lack of prosecution. See D.C. App. R. 13(a). It is FURTHER ORDERED that appellee Ink Reinforcement Agency, Inc., shall within 15 days from the date of this order advise this court as to the identity of its counsel. See Moore Energy Resources, Inc. V. Public Serv. Comm'n of the District of Columbia, 785 A.2d 300, 304 (D.C. 2001); D.C. App. R. 3 (c)(2). (ETW) elp
04/19/2007 On consideration of this court's order of March 21, 2007, directing appellant to file the statement regarding transcript within 20 days from the date of the order, and it appearing that appellant has failed to comply with the order, it is ORDERED that this appeal is hereby dismissed. See D.C. App R. 13. (ETW) elp
04/19/2007DISMISSED
04/24/2007APPELLANT'S MOTION TO REINSTATE APPEAL
04/24/2007RECEIVED - aplt's statement regarding transcripts(dwm)
05/10/2007 On consideration of appellant's motion to reinstate this appeal, and the lodged statement regarding transcript, and it appearing that transcript is needed for this appeal, and upon further consideration of this court's order of March 21, 2007, directing appellee Ink Reinforcement Agency Inc. to identify its counsel within 15 days from the date of the order, and it fyrther appearing that appellee Ink Reinforcement Agency Inc., has failed to comply, it is ORDERED that the motion is granted and this appeal is hereby reinstated. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall file the lodged statement regarding transcript. It is ****************MORE*****************
05/10/2007STATEMENT REGARDING TRANSCRIPT(S) (RT-NEEDED/RT-ORDERED for 1/12/06)
05/10/2007 FURTHER ORDERED that a briefing order will be issued upon the filing in this court, by the Clerk of the Superior Court, of the record index and transcripts required by D.C. App. R. 11 (b)(3)(A). It is FURTHER ORDERED that appellee Ink Reinforcement Agency Inc. shall within 15 days from the date of this order identify its counsel. Failure to comply with this order shall result in appellee Ink Reinforcement Agency Inc., being prohibited from filing its brief. (ETW) elp
07/19/2007RECORD INDEX
07/19/2007SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD #1 (19-pgs/tape 1/12/06 proc.
07/19/2007RECORD COMPLETED
07/27/2007 It appearing that the complete record on appeal has been filed with this court, it is ORDERED that appellant's brief and the appendix including the documents required by D.C. App. r. 30 (a)(1) shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and appellee's brief shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 31. (GP) elp
08/17/2007APPELLANT'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF no oppo to 9/26/07
08/22/2007 On consideration of appellant's consent motion for an extension of time within which to file the brief and the appendix, it is ORDERED that the motion is granted and appellant's brief and the appendix shall be filed on or before September 26, 2007. (GP) elp
09/26/2007APPELLANT'S BRIEF
09/26/2007APPENDIX
10/22/2007APPELLEE'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF to 14 days. (Okie Dokie) no oppo
10/24/2007 On consideration of appellee Okie Dokie's motion for extension of time within which to file the brief, it is ORDERED that the motion is granted and appellee Okie Dokie's brief shall be filed on or before November 9, 2007. (GP) elp
11/09/2007APPELLEE'S BRIEF (Okie Dokie, Inc.)
11/15/2007 On consideration of this court's order of May 10, 2007, which directed appellee Ink Reinforcement Agency Inc., to identify its counsel within 15 days from the date of the order or be prohibited from filing its brief, and it appearing that appellee Ink Reinforcement Agency Inc., has failed to comply with the order, it is ORDERED that this appeal shall be scheduled for consideration before a merits division of this court on the record and on appellate briefs on file. (ETW) elp
11/15/2007BRIEFS COMPLETED
11/26/2007APLT MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE REPLY BRIEF to December 20, 2007 (consent)
11/27/2007 On consideration of appellant's consent motion for an extension of time within which to file the reply brief, it is ORDERED that appellant's motion is granted and appellant's reply brief shall be filed on or before December 20, 2007. (GP) elp
12/10/2007FINAL SCREENING - REGULAR CALENDAR
12/20/2007APPELLANT'S REPLY BRIEF
07/11/2008 It appearing that this appeal is likely to be calendared for argument during the months of October 2008 thru December 2008, it is ORDERED that counsel shall advise this court in writing by August 18, 2008 of specific dates during that period when they are unavailable so that the court can attempt to avoid such dates in scheduling argument. Counsel must continue to advise the court of availabilities for subsequent months until this case is in fact set for argument. Note that the calendar is prepared approximately two months in advance, e.g. January calendar set for release at the end of November. The court does not encourage the filing of motions to postpone a scheduled argument. If you do seek a change in a scheduled argument date, your motion should both indicate the opponent's position with respect to your request and alternative dates when you and opposing counsel would be available. You may call the Calendar Clerk prior to filing such a motion for information on dates in the scheduled month when the courtroom is available.(aj) Garland Pinkston, Jr. Clerk
08/19/2008LETTER FROM COUNSEL/PARTY RE FUTURE CALENDARING aple
08/29/2008CALENDAR NOTICE SENT
10/02/2008FiledACTION - Argued / Submitted
10/02/2008ARGUED before Judge Reid, Glickman, Kramer Jack A. Gold, Esq. for Okie Dokie, Inc., et al. James C. Mehigan, Esq. for Michael Anthony
02/03/2009CHANGE OF ADDRESS RECEIVED Angela W. Russell 1341 G St., N.W. WDC 20005
07/30/2009REVERSED AND REMANDED Opinion (Reid, Glickman, Kramer) and Judgment reversing the trial court's judgment and remanding the case for trial.
08/24/2009MANDATE ISSUED