Case Information: 09-CV-0074 | |||
Short Caption: | MICHAEL SINDRAM V. LAWRENCE ASHLEY | Classification: | Appeals - Civil - Torts |
Superior Court or Agency Case Number: | CAB7825-08 | Filed Date: | 01/09/2009 |
| |||
Opening Event Date: | 01/09/2009 | Case Status: | Closed |
Record Completed: | Post-Decision Matter Pending: | ||
Briefs Completed: | |||
Argued/Submitted: | |||
Disposition: | Next Scheduled Action: | ||
Mandate Issued: | 03/30/2009 |
Party Information | |||||
Appellate Role | Party Name | IFP | Attorney(s) | Arguing Attorney | E-Filer |
Appellant | Michael Sindram | N | Pro Se | N | |
Appellee | Lawrence Ashley | N | Pro Se | N |
Events | ||||
Event Date | Status | Description | Result | |
01/09/2009 | NOTICE OF APPEAL | |||
02/05/2009 | ORDERED that appellant shall within 20 days from the date of this order SHOW CAUSE why this appeal should not be dismissed for having been taken from a NON-FINAL ORDER. See D.C. Code 11-721 (2001). (BY: ETW) | |||
02/05/2009 | TMC - OTSC - ROTSC | |||
02/20/2009 | RECEIVED - aplt's response. | |||
03/06/2009 | ORDERED that the Clerk SHALL FILE the LODGED RESPONSE but appellant is reminded fot his court's rules for pleading and this court's previous order of June 7, 1994... It is FURTHER ORDERED that THESE APPEALS ARE HEREBY DISMISSED for LACK OF JURISDICTION as having been taken from NON-FINAL ORDERS of the Superior Court. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk SHALL NOT ACCEPT FOR FILING ANY PAPER that fails to PROPERLY DESIGNATE THE APPEAL OR COMPLY WITH THIS COURT'S RULES. See D.C. App.R. 3,10,25, 27-28, 30-32. (RZBETE) | |||
03/06/2009 | DISMISSED | |||
03/30/2009 | MANDATE ISSUED | |||
04/24/2014 | Filed | Archived |