judyrecords
search tips
750 million+
United States Court Cases

District Of Columbia Court Of Appeals Record

PEPCO V. DC DEPT OF EMPLOYMENT SVCS.

Case Information: 08-AA-0344
Short Caption:PEPCO V. DC DEPT OF EMPLOYMENT SVCS.Classification:Agency - Administrative Agency - Worker's Compensation
Superior Court or Agency Case Number:CRB057-08Filed Date:04/04/2008

Opening Event Date:04/04/2008Case Status:Closed
Record Completed:05/15/2008Post-Decision Matter Pending:
Briefs Completed:09/02/2008
Argued/Submitted:05/15/2009
Disposition:Next Scheduled Action:
Mandate Issued:09/22/2009

Party Information
Appellate RoleParty NameIFPAttorney(s)Arguing AttorneyE-Filer
Intervenor-RespondentQuinton Briscoe N
W. Scott Funger YN
PetitionerPepcoN
Kevin J. O'ConnellYY
RespondentD.C. Department of Employment Services - Worker's Comp.N
Todd S. KimNY
Richard S. LoveYY

Events
Event DateStatusDescriptionResult
04/04/2008PETITION FOR REVIEW
04/04/2008FILING FEE of $100.00 paid
04/08/2008CERTIFIED COPY OF PETITION TO BOARD, Gregory Lamb, Esq. and Todd Kim, Esq.
04/14/2008NOTICE OF INTENT TO INTERVENE of Quinton Briscoe on behalf of respondent
05/15/2008RECORD ON APPEAL
05/15/2008SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD #1 (8/25/06 hearing)
05/15/2008RECORD COMPLETED
05/21/2008 It appearing that the complete record on appeal has been filed with this court, it is ORDERED that petitioner's brief and the appendix including the documents required by D.C. App. R. 30 (a)(1), shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and respondent's and intervenor's briefs shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 30, 31. (GP)
06/20/2008PETITIONER'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF to 7/30/08. no opposition
06/24/2008 On consideration of petitioner's motion for an extension of time within which to file the brief, to which no opposition has been filed, it is ORDERED that the motion is granted and petitioner's brief and the appendix shall be filed on or before July 30, 2008. (dlm)
07/30/2008PETITIONER'S BRIEF
07/30/2008APPENDIX - petitioner's
08/08/2008INTERVENOR'S BRIEF
08/08/2008APPENDIX - intervenor's
09/02/2008RESPONDENT'S BRIEF
09/02/2008BRIEFS COMPLETED
09/23/2008FINAL SCREENING - REGULAR CALENDAR
12/12/2008 It appearing that this appeal is likely to be calendared for argument during the months of March 2009 thru May 2009, it is ORDERED that counsel shall advise this court in writing by January 12, 2009 of specific dates during that period when they are unavailable so that the court can attempt to avoid such dates in scheduling argument. Counsel must continue to advise the court of availabilities for subsequent months until this case is in fact set for argument. Note that the calendar is prepared approximately two months in advance, e.g. January calendar set for release at the end of November. The court does not encourage the filing of motions to postpone a scheduled argument. If you do seek a change in a scheduled argument date, your motion should both indicate the opponent's position with respect to your request and alternative dates when you and opposing counsel would be available. You may call the Calendar Clerk prior to filing such a motion for information on dates in the scheduled month when the courtroom is available.(aj) Garland Pinkston, Jr. Clerk
01/09/2009LETTER FROM COUNSEL/PARTY RE FUTURE CALENDARING intervenor
01/09/2009LETTER FROM COUNSEL/PARTY RE FUTURE CALENDARING
02/19/2009LETTER FROM COUNSEL/PARTY RE FUTURE CALENDARING
02/26/2009LETTER FROM COUNSEL/PARTY RE FUTURE CALENDARING intervenor
03/10/2009LETTER FROM COUNSEL/PARTY RE FUTURE CALENDARING
03/20/2009LETTER FROM COUNSEL/PARTY RE FUTURE CALENDARING
04/01/2009CALENDAR NOTICE SENT
05/15/2009FiledACTION - Argued / Submitted
05/15/2009ARGUED before Judges Ruiz, Oberly, Steadman Kevin J. O'Connell, Esq. for petitioner Richard S. Love, Esq. for respondent W. Scott Funger, Esq. for intv-respondent
08/31/2009VACATED MOJ (Ruiz, Oberly, Steadman) vacating the decision of the D.C. Compensation Review Board and remanding the case to said CRB with instructions to remand it to the Administrative Law Judge for further proceedings as set forth in said MOJ.
09/22/2009MANDATE ISSUED