Case Information: 08-AA-0344 | |||
Short Caption: | PEPCO V. DC DEPT OF EMPLOYMENT SVCS. | Classification: | Agency - Administrative Agency - Worker's Compensation |
Superior Court or Agency Case Number: | CRB057-08 | Filed Date: | 04/04/2008 |
| |||
Opening Event Date: | 04/04/2008 | Case Status: | Closed |
Record Completed: | 05/15/2008 | Post-Decision Matter Pending: | |
Briefs Completed: | 09/02/2008 | ||
Argued/Submitted: | 05/15/2009 | ||
Disposition: | Next Scheduled Action: | ||
Mandate Issued: | 09/22/2009 |
Party Information | ||||||||||||
Appellate Role | Party Name | IFP | Attorney(s) | Arguing Attorney | E-Filer | |||||||
Intervenor-Respondent | Quinton Briscoe | N |
| |||||||||
Petitioner | Pepco | N |
| |||||||||
Respondent | D.C. Department of Employment Services - Worker's Comp. | N |
|
Events | ||||
Event Date | Status | Description | Result | |
04/04/2008 | PETITION FOR REVIEW | |||
04/04/2008 | FILING FEE of $100.00 paid | |||
04/08/2008 | CERTIFIED COPY OF PETITION TO BOARD, Gregory Lamb, Esq. and Todd Kim, Esq. | |||
04/14/2008 | NOTICE OF INTENT TO INTERVENE of Quinton Briscoe on behalf of respondent | |||
05/15/2008 | RECORD ON APPEAL | |||
05/15/2008 | SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD #1 (8/25/06 hearing) | |||
05/15/2008 | RECORD COMPLETED | |||
05/21/2008 | It appearing that the complete record on appeal has been filed with this court, it is ORDERED that petitioner's brief and the appendix including the documents required by D.C. App. R. 30 (a)(1), shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and respondent's and intervenor's briefs shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 30, 31. (GP) | |||
06/20/2008 | PETITIONER'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF to 7/30/08. no opposition | |||
06/24/2008 | On consideration of petitioner's motion for an extension of time within which to file the brief, to which no opposition has been filed, it is ORDERED that the motion is granted and petitioner's brief and the appendix shall be filed on or before July 30, 2008. (dlm) | |||
07/30/2008 | PETITIONER'S BRIEF | |||
07/30/2008 | APPENDIX - petitioner's | |||
08/08/2008 | INTERVENOR'S BRIEF | |||
08/08/2008 | APPENDIX - intervenor's | |||
09/02/2008 | RESPONDENT'S BRIEF | |||
09/02/2008 | BRIEFS COMPLETED | |||
09/23/2008 | FINAL SCREENING - REGULAR CALENDAR | |||
12/12/2008 | It appearing that this appeal is likely to be calendared for argument during the months of March 2009 thru May 2009, it is ORDERED that counsel shall advise this court in writing by January 12, 2009 of specific dates during that period when they are unavailable so that the court can attempt to avoid such dates in scheduling argument. Counsel must continue to advise the court of availabilities for subsequent months until this case is in fact set for argument. Note that the calendar is prepared approximately two months in advance, e.g. January calendar set for release at the end of November. The court does not encourage the filing of motions to postpone a scheduled argument. If you do seek a change in a scheduled argument date, your motion should both indicate the opponent's position with respect to your request and alternative dates when you and opposing counsel would be available. You may call the Calendar Clerk prior to filing such a motion for information on dates in the scheduled month when the courtroom is available.(aj) Garland Pinkston, Jr. Clerk | |||
01/09/2009 | LETTER FROM COUNSEL/PARTY RE FUTURE CALENDARING intervenor | |||
01/09/2009 | LETTER FROM COUNSEL/PARTY RE FUTURE CALENDARING | |||
02/19/2009 | LETTER FROM COUNSEL/PARTY RE FUTURE CALENDARING | |||
02/26/2009 | LETTER FROM COUNSEL/PARTY RE FUTURE CALENDARING intervenor | |||
03/10/2009 | LETTER FROM COUNSEL/PARTY RE FUTURE CALENDARING | |||
03/20/2009 | LETTER FROM COUNSEL/PARTY RE FUTURE CALENDARING | |||
04/01/2009 | CALENDAR NOTICE SENT | |||
05/15/2009 | Filed | ACTION - Argued / Submitted | ||
05/15/2009 | ARGUED before Judges Ruiz, Oberly, Steadman Kevin J. O'Connell, Esq. for petitioner Richard S. Love, Esq. for respondent W. Scott Funger, Esq. for intv-respondent | |||
08/31/2009 | VACATED MOJ (Ruiz, Oberly, Steadman) vacating the decision of the D.C. Compensation Review Board and remanding the case to said CRB with instructions to remand it to the Administrative Law Judge for further proceedings as set forth in said MOJ. | |||
09/22/2009 | MANDATE ISSUED |