judyrecords
search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

District Of Columbia Court Of Appeals Record

PIERRE CHONE V. VERIZON INTERNET SERVICES

Case Information: 06-CV-1414
Short Caption:PIERRE CHONE V. VERIZON INTERNET SERVICESClassification:Appeals - Civil - Other Civil
Superior Court or Agency Case Number:SC2-8276-05Filed Date:09/27/2006

Opening Event Date:09/27/2006Case Status:Closed
Record Completed:10/19/2007Post-Decision Matter Pending:
Briefs Completed:01/07/2008
Argued/Submitted:11/04/2008
Disposition:Next Scheduled Action:
Mandate Issued:02/23/2009

Party Information
Appellate RoleParty NameIFPAttorney(s)Arguing AttorneyE-Filer
AppellantPierre Chone NPro SeN
AppelleeVerizon Internet ServicesN
Natalie O. LudawayNN
Matthew H. Goodman YN

Events
Event DateStatusDescriptionResult
09/27/2006NOTICE OF APPEAL-(NUNC PRO TUNC per 12/5/06 order)
12/05/2006 On consideration of this court's November 15, 2006, order directing applicant to show cause why appeal no. 06-DA-14 should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction as having been untimely filed, and the response thereto, and it appearing that this matter actually involves a timely filed notice of appeal from the Superior Court's Civil Division, it is ORDERED that the order to SHOW CAUSE IS HEREBY DISCHARGED and the APPLICATION IS HEREBY DISMISSED. It is *****MORE*****
12/05/2006 FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk SHALL FILE the notice of appeal NUNC PRO TUNC to September 27, 2006. It is ****MORE****
12/05/2006 FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk SHALL TRANSMIT a COPY OF THE NOTICE OF APPEAL and the filing fee to the Superior Court to be processed. It is *****MORE*****
12/05/2006 ORDERED that appellant shall, within 20 days from the date of this order, complete and file with this court a single copy of the attached statemeent regarding transcript. Where transcript(s) necessary for this appeal have been ordered and completed for non-appeal purposes, appellant must advise the Court Reporting Division to forward said transcript(s) for inclusion in the record on appeal. If partial transcripts are being ordered, appellant must file a statement of issues to be raised on appeal with this court within 10 days from the date of this order. See D.C. App. R. 10 (b)(3)(A). (KRSTTE)
12/22/2006STATEMENT REGARDING TRANSCRIPT(S) (RT-NEEDED/RT-ORDERED for 7/7/06) elp
07/19/2007 On consideration of appellant's statement regarding transcript filed with this court on December 22, 2006, and it appearing that there are no orders for transcript pending with the Court Reporting Division of the Superior Court, it is ORDERED that appellant shall within 20 days from the date of this order advise this court, with specificity, of all actions appellant has taken, including those taken since the date appellant file the statement regarding transcript to assure the transmittal of that transcript to this court. See D.C. App. R. 10. (GP) elp
08/01/2007APPELLANT'S ANSWER/RESPONSE -to order of 7/19/07
08/07/2007NOTICE RECEIVED - substitution of appearance from Ms. Herring to Ms. Natalie O. Ludaway (construed as a motion for substitution of counsel) (elp)
08/14/2007 On consideration of the motion of counsel for appellee Natalie O. Ludaway, Esquire, to withdraw the appearance of Charniele Herring, Esquire, as counsel of record for appellee, it is ORDERED that the motion of counsel for appellee Natalie O. Ludaway, Esquire, is granted and the appearance of Charniele Herring, Esquire, is hereby withdrawn as counsel of record for appellee. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall note that Natalie O. Ludaway, Esquire, is the new counsel of record. (ETW) elp
10/19/2007RECORD INDEX
10/19/2007SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD #1 (71-pgs/tape 7/7/06 proc.)
10/19/2007RECORD COMPLETED
10/24/2007 It appearing that the complete record on appeal has been filed with this court, it is ORDERED that appellant's brief and the appendix including the documents required by D.C. App. R. 30 (a)(1), shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and appellee's brief shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 31. (GP) elp
12/03/2007APPELLANT'S BRIEF
12/03/2007APPENDIX - aplt
01/07/2008APPELLEE'S BRIEF
01/07/2008BRIEFS COMPLETED
01/23/2008FINAL SCREENING - REGULAR CALENDAR
01/24/2008APPELLANT'S REPLY BRIEF
07/11/2008 It appearing that this appeal is likely to be calendared for argument during the months of October 2008 thru December 2008, it is ORDERED that counsel shall advise this court in writing by August 18, 2008 of specific dates during that period when they are unavailable so that the court can attempt to avoid such dates in scheduling argument. Counsel must continue to advise the court of availabilities for subsequent months until this case is in fact set for argument. Note that the calendar is prepared approximately two months in advance, e.g. January calendar set for release at the end of November. The court does not encourage the filing of motions to postpone a scheduled argument. If you do seek a change in a scheduled argument date, your motion should both indicate the opponent's position with respect to your request and alternative dates when you and opposing counsel would be available. You may call the Calendar Clerk prior to filing such a motion for information on dates in the scheduled month when the courtroom is available.(aj) Garland Pinkston, Jr. Clerk
07/22/2008LETTER FROM COUNSEL/PARTY RE FUTURE CALENDARING aplt
10/01/2008CALENDAR NOTICE SENT
11/04/2008FiledACTION - Argued / Submitted
11/04/2008ARGUED before Judges Kramer, Blackburne-Rigsby, Nebeker Pierre Chone, Pro Se for Appellant Natalie O. Ludaway, Esq. for Appellee
12/09/2008AFFIRMED MOJ (Kramer, Blackburne-Rigsby, Nebeker)
12/23/2008APPELLANT'S PETITION FOR REHEARING
02/13/2009ORDER DENYING APPELLANT'S PETITION FOR REHEARING (KR,BR,NE)
02/23/2009MANDATE ISSUED