judyrecords
search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

District Of Columbia Court Of Appeals Record

CATHY CHAUPIS V. DC DEP'T OF EMPLOYMENT SERVS.

Case Information: 08-AA-1579
Short Caption:CATHY CHAUPIS V. DC DEP'T OF EMPLOYMENT SERVS.Classification:Agency - Administrative Agency - Worker's Compensation
Lead:08-AA-1579Consolidated: 08-AA-1586
Superior Court or Agency Case Number:CRB222-08Filed Date:12/11/2008

Opening Event Date:12/11/2008Case Status:Closed
Record Completed:01/16/2009Post-Decision Matter Pending:
Briefs Completed:
Argued/Submitted:
Disposition:Next Scheduled Action:
Mandate Issued:08/25/2009

Party Information
Appellate RoleParty NameIFPAttorney(s)Arguing AttorneyE-Filer
PetitionerCathy Chaupis N
Matthew J. PefferYY
RespondentD.C. Department of Employment Services - Worker's Comp.N
Todd S. KimNY
David A. Hyden NN

Events
Event DateStatusDescriptionResult
12/11/2008PETITION FOR REVIEW
12/11/2008FILING FEE of $100.00.
12/12/2008CERTIFIED COPY OF PETITION TO BOARD Todd Kim, Esq. & Gregory Lamb, Esq.
12/24/2008 Upon consideration of the petitions for review filed in these matters, it is ORDERED, sua sponte, that petition for review nos. 08-AA-1579 and 08-AA-1586 are consolidated for all purposes herein. It is FURTHER ORDERED that respondent shall file the admnistrative record within 60 days from the date of this order. (GP)
01/16/2009RECORD ON APPEAL (for both) ta
01/16/2009RECORD COMPLETED
01/23/2009 It appearing that the complete record on appeal has been filed with this court, it is ORDERED that petitioners' briefs and the appendix shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and respondent's brief shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 30, 31. (GP)
01/23/2009RECEIVED - Pet's (GWU) response to claimint's motion in support of pet for review.
03/03/2009PETITIONER'S BRIEF (GW/08-AA-1586).
03/03/2009APPENDIX to Petitioner's Brief in 08-AA-1586.
03/04/2009PETITIONER'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF (Chaupis) no oppo' to 4/20/09
03/20/2009RECEIVED - pet's Chaupis brief.
03/31/2009 On consideration of petitioner Cathy Chaupis' motion for leave to file the lodged brief, to which no opposition has been filed, it is ORDERED that petitioner Cathy Chaupis' motion is granted and the lodged brief is filed. It is FURTHER ORDERED that respondent's brief shall be filed within 30 days from the date of this order. (GP)
03/31/2009PETITIONER'S BRIEF (Chaupis)
04/17/2009CROSS-PETITIONER'S RESPONSE BRIEF
04/30/2009RESPONDENT'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF to 6/1/09
05/22/2009RESPONDENT'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF no oppo 7/1/09
05/29/2009 On consideration of respondent's motions for extensions of time within which to file the brief,to which no opposition have been filed, it is ORDERED that respondent's motions are granted and the brief of respondent shall be filed on or before July 1, 2009. Any further requests for extensions of time will be looked upon with disfavor and granted only upon a showing of good cause. (GP)
07/01/2009RESPONDENT'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF to 7/8/09
07/08/2009RESPONDENT'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF until July 15, 2009
07/15/2009RESPONDENT'S MOTION TO DISMISS/WITHDRAW APPEAL for lack of jurisdiction
07/16/2009TMC - respondent's motion to dismiss - opposition - respondent's motionS to extend time to file brief
07/27/2009PETITIONER'S OPPOSITION - to respondent's motion to dismiss
07/30/2009 ORDERED that THESE PFR'S are HEREBY DISMISSED AS HAVING BEEN TAKEN FROM A NON-FINAL and NON-APPEALABLE ORDER. See Levy v. DC BD of Zoning Adjus., 570 A.2d 739, 749 (D.C. 1990). It is *****MORE*****
07/30/2009 FURTHER ORDERED that RESPONDENT'S MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME and TO DISMISS ARE DENIED AS MOOT. (KROBNW)
07/30/2009DISMISSED
08/25/2009MANDATE ISSUED
05/02/2014FiledArchived