| Events |
| Event Date | Status | Description | Result |
| 09/04/1970 | | error - do not use | |
| 09/04/1970 | | error - do not reuse | |
| 12/05/2008 | | NOTICE OF APPEAL | |
| 12/18/2008 | | ORDERED that appellant shall within 20 days from the date of this order SHOW CAUSE why this appeal should not be dismissed as having been UNTIMELY FILED TO THE EXTENT it seeks review of the underlying judgment. D.C. App. R. 4(a)(1). It is FURTHER ORDERED that appellant shall also SHOW CAUSE why this appeal should not be dismissed for having been taken froma NON-FINAL and NON-APPEALABLE order to the EXTENT that it seeks review of the order denying the untimely Rul 59 (e) motions. (BY: ETW) | |
| 12/18/2008 | | TMC - OTSC - ROTSC - response to ROTSC | |
| 01/07/2009 | | APLT MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE ANSWER/RESPONSEfor ten (10) days to show cause order of 12/18/08 | |
| 01/12/2009 | | On consideration of appellant's motion for extension of time to respond, it is ORDERED that the motion is granted and appellant's response to this court's show cause order shall be filed no later than January 21, 2009. (BY: ETW) lw | |
| 01/13/2009 | | RECEIVED - aple's opposition to motion for extension of time to file a response to the show cause order of 12/18/08 | |
| 01/21/2009 | | RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE (filing was submitted unsigned by appellant's counsel - accepted per RM) | |
| 01/26/2009 | | APPELLEE'S OPPOSITION to aplt's show cause response.(J. Crew Inc.) dwm | |
| 02/04/2009 | | ORDERED that this court's OTSC IS HEREBY DISCHARGED. However, the parties shall address the juridictional issue in their briefs. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk, Superior Court shall transmit the record index. It is *****MORE****** | |
| 02/04/2009 | | FURTHER ORDERED that appellant's brief and the joint appendix shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and the brief of the appellees shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 30, 31. (KRBEST) | |
| 02/09/2009 | | APPELLANT'S MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION to proceed on appeal without remand (with attachments) | |
| 02/11/2009 | | On consideration of appellant's motion to proceed, and upon further consideration of this court order of February 4, 2009, which discharged this court's order to show cause and directed appellant to file the brief and the appendix within 40 days from the date of the order, it is ORDERED that appellant's motion is denied as moot. (ETW) elp | |
| 02/18/2009 | | APPELLEE'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY AFFIRMANCE OR in the alternative to dismiss appeal (dwm) | |
| 02/19/2009 | | TMC - motion for summary affirmance OR DISMISSAL - opposition | |
| 03/02/2009 | | APPELLANT'S OPPOSITION to Motion for Summary Affirmance or in the alternative to dismiss appeal | |
| 03/03/2009 | | RECORD INDEX | |
| 03/03/2009 | | RECORD COMPLETED | |
| 03/12/2009 | | ORDERED that the MOTION FOR SUMMARY AFFIRMANCE IS DENIED. Oliver T. Carr Mgm't, Inc. v. Nat'l Deli, Inc., 397 A.2d 914, 915 (D.C. 1979). It is FURTHER ORDERED that the ALTERNATIVE MOTION TO DISMISS appeal IS DENIED but W/O PREJUDICE to the parties raising jurisdiction in their briefs. It is FURTHER ORDERED that APPELLANT'S BRIEF REMAINS TO BE FILED ON or before MARCH 16, 2009. (KRBEST) | |
| 03/16/2009 | | APPELLANT'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF until March 31, 2009 (unopposed) (Titled as: Motion to Reschedule) | |
| 03/20/2009 | | On consideration of appellant's consent motion to reschedule briefing, it is ORDERED that the motion is granted and appellant's brief and the appendix shall be filed on or before March 31, 2009, and appellee's brief shall be filed on or before April 30, 2009. (GP) elp | |
| 03/31/2009 | | RECEIVED - Appellant's Brief (the brief is unsigned. Appellant's counsel notified by phone and asked to come in and sign the brief by 12 noon today)(this is the second time Appellant's counsel has submitted unsigned filings) | |
| 03/31/2009 | | APPENDIX | |
| 04/02/2009 | | NOTICE SENT - to aplt's attorney re: signature on brief. brief sent back | |
| 04/06/2009 | | On consideration of this court's order of March 20, 2009, granting appellant's motion for an extension of time to file the brief on or before March 31, 2009, and it appearing that the brief has not been filed, it is ORDERED that the appellant shall within 20 days from the date of this order, submit the brief, accompanied by a motion for leave to file the documents out of time. The motion shall set forth good cause for the failure either to timely file the documents or to request an extension of time within which to do so. Failure to comply with this order shall subject this appeal to dismissal without further notice. (GP) elp | |
| 04/16/2009 | | APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE BRIEF (did not comply with DCCA Rule 27 (b)(4)) | |
| 04/16/2009 | | RECEIVED - Appellant's Brief | |
| 04/29/2009 | | RECEIVED - (appellee's brief) (elp) | |
| 05/04/2009 | | On consideration of appellant's motion for leave to late file the lodged brief, to which no opposition has been filed, and the lodged brief of appellee, it is ORDERED that appellant's motion is granted and the lodged brief is filed. It is (MORE) | |
| 05/04/2009 | | APPELLANT'S BRIEF | |
| 05/04/2009 | | FURTHER ORDERED that appellee's lodged brief is filed. It is (MORE) | |
| 05/04/2009 | | APPELLEE'S BRIEF | |
| 05/04/2009 | | FURTHER ORDERED that this appeal shall be scheduled for consideration before a merits division as soon as the calendar permits. (GP) elp | |
| 05/04/2009 | | BRIEFS COMPLETED | |
| 05/20/2009 | | APPELLANT'S REPLY BRIEF | |
| 06/03/2009 | | Upon consideration of the notices of appeal in these matter, and it appearing that briefing has been completed in appeal no. 08-CV-1564, and it further appearing that transcript may be needed for appeal no. 09-CV-542, it is ORDERED, sua sponte, that appeals nos. 08-CV-1564 and 09-CV-542 are consolidated for all purposes. It is FURTHER ORDERED that, in appeal no. 09-CV-542, appellant shall within 20 days from the date of this order complete and file within this court a single copy of the statement regarding transcript available for completion online. Where transcript(s) necessady for this appeal have been order and completed for non-appeal purposes, appellant must advise the Court Reporting Division to forward said transcript(s) for inclusion in the record on appeal. If partial transcripts are being order, appellant must file a statement of issues to be presented with this court within 10 days from the date of this order. See D.C. App. R. 10 (b)(3)(A). It is FURTHER ORDERED that appellant's failure to respond to any of this court, including this order, shall subject these appeals to dismissal without further notice for lack of prosecution. See D.C. App. R. 13 (a). It is FURTHER ORDERED that a briefing order addressing the issues raised in appeal no. 09-CV-542 will be issued upon the filing in this court, by the Clerk of the Superior Court, the record index and transcripts required by D.C. App. R. 11 (b)(3)(A). (GP) elp | |
| 06/23/2009 | | APPELLANT'S ANSWER/RESPONSE- to court order of 6/3/09 - * Stating appellant have ordered the transcripts needed for these appeals. (elp) | |
| 06/23/2009 | | STATEMENT REGARDING TRANSCRIPT(S) (09-CV-542) (RT-NEEDED/RT-ORDERED for 4/30/08, 7/31/08 & 9/12/08) (elp) | |
| 06/26/2009 | | SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD#1 (29-pgs/tape 4/30/08 proc.) | |
| 06/26/2009 | | SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD#2 (22-pgs/tape 7/31/08 proc.) | |
| 09/18/2009 | | It appearing that briefing has been completed in appeal no. 08-CV-1574, and it further appearing that appellant has been notified by the Court Reporting Division of the Superior Court that that the transcript requested for appeal no. 09-CV-542 has been prepared and is ready for transmittal to this court, it is ORDERED that appellant shall within 10 calendar days from the date of this order make the necessary arrangements to have the transcript for appeal no. 09-CV-542 transmitted to this court, it is FURTHER ORDERED that appellant shall, within 10 calendar days from the date of this order, file a notice showing that appellant has paid for the transcript and attach a copy of the receipt to the notice. Failure to comply with this order shall subject appeal no. 09-CV-542 to dismissal without further notice. See D.C. App. R. 13. (GP) elp | |
| 10/22/2009 | | On consideration of this court's order of September 18, 2009, which directed appellant to file a notice showing that she had paid for the transcript needed for appeal no. 09-CV-542 within 10 calendar days, and it appearing that appellant has failed to comply with the order, and it further appearing that briefing has been completed in appeal no. 08-CV-1564, it is ORDERED, sua sponte, that these appeals are hereby severed. It is FURTHER ORDERED that appeal no. 09-CV-542 is hereby dismissed. See D.C. App. R. 13. It is FURTHER ORDERED that appeal no. 08-CV-1564 shall be scheduled for consideration before a merits division as soon as the calendar permits. (ETW) elp | |
| 11/16/2009 | | FINAL SCREENING - REGULAR CALENDAR | |
| 11/25/2009 | | SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD#3 (6-pgs/tape 9/12/08 proc.)w/cd | |
| 01/11/2010 | | It appearing that this appeal is likely to be calendared for argument during the month(s) of March 2010 through April 2010, it is ORDERED that counsel shall advise this court in writing by Jan. 22, 2010, of specific dates du ring that period when they are unavailable so that the court can attempt to avoid such dates in scheduling argument. (Please see the attached instruction sheet.) (aj) Garland Pinkston, Jr. Clerk | |
| 01/19/2010 | | LETTER FROM COUNSEL/PARTY RE FUTURE CALENDARING aple | |
| 02/03/2010 | | CALENDAR NOTICE SENT | |
| 03/09/2010 | | APPEARANCE- of Laurence A. Elgin on behalf of aplt | |
| 03/11/2010 | Filed | ACTION - Argued / Submitted | |
| 03/11/2010 | | ARGUED before Judges Reid, Thompson, Wagner, Laurence A. Elgin, Esq. for Appellant Padraic K. Keane, Esq. for Appellee | |
| 01/20/2011 | | DISMISSED in part AFFIRMED in part and REMANDED in part (OPINION) (Reid, Thompson and Wagner) (Ordered and Adjudged that the appeal of the underlying judgment is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, the denial of appellant's post-judgment motion insofar as it sought relief under Rule 60(b) is affirmed and this case is remanded to the trial court for correction of the record to reflect the judgment in favor of J. Crew. | |
| 02/03/2011 | | APLT'S PETITION FOR REHEARING/REHEARING EN BANC | |
| 03/16/2011 | | ORD DENY APPELLANT'S PETITION FOR REH/REH EN BANC (WHRZRDGLKRFIBRTHOBWA) | |
| 03/22/2011 | | MANDATE ISSUED | |