judyrecords
search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

District Of Columbia Court Of Appeals Record

TROY L. STEVENSON V. MICHAEL MILLER, ET AL

Case Information: 08-CV-1573
Short Caption:TROY L. STEVENSON V. MICHAEL MILLER, ET ALClassification:Appeals - Civil - Other Civil
Superior Court or Agency Case Number:CAB2011-08Filed Date:12/04/2008

Opening Event Date:12/04/2008Case Status:Closed
Record Completed:03/23/2009Post-Decision Matter Pending:
Briefs Completed:
Argued/Submitted:
Disposition:Next Scheduled Action:
Mandate Issued:11/25/2009
Costs Waived

Party Information
Appellate RoleParty NameIFPAttorney(s)Arguing AttorneyE-Filer
AppellantTroy Lamont StevensonYPro SeN
AppelleeMichael Miller N
Todd S. KimNY
Mary L. WilsonNY
AppelleeDistrict of ColumbiaN
Todd S. KimNY
Mary L. WilsonNY
AppelleeD.C. Metropolitan Police DepartmentN
Todd S. KimNY
Mary L. WilsonNY

Events
Event DateStatusDescriptionResult
12/04/2008NOTICE OF APPEAL
01/05/2009 On consideration of the notice of appeal filed in this case on December 4, 2008, and it appearing that appellant was granted in forma pauperis status in the trial court, and it further appearing that transcript may be needed for this appeal, it is ORDERED that appellant shall within 20 days from the date of this order file with the Court Reporting Division a request for preparation of transcripts of proceedings in the Superior Court, on motion with notice, to the appropriate motions or trial judge, for determination in accordance with Hancock v. Mutual of Omaha Ins. Co., 472 A.2d 867 (D.C. 1984). See D.C. App. R. 10 (b)(5)(A). It is FURTHER ORDERED that appellant shall simultaneously submit a file stamped copy of that motion with this court, it is FURTHER ORDERED that appellant's failure to respond to any order of this court, including this order, shall subject this appeal to dismissal without further notice for lack of prosecution. See D.C. App. R. 13(a). (GP) elp
02/09/2009 On consideration of this court's order of January 5, 2009, directing appellant to submit to this court a file-stamped copy of the motion for appeal transcript filed in the Superior Court, within 20 days from the date of this order, and it appearing that appellant has failed to comply with the order, it is ORDERED that this appeal is hereby dismissed. See D.C. App. R. 13. (ETW) elp
02/09/2009DISMISSED
02/11/2009APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (with attached Motion for Appeal Transcript)dwm
03/03/2009 On consideration of appellant's motion for reconsideration and to reinstate this appeal, to which no opposition has been filed, and the lodged motion for appeal transcript, and it appearing that no transcript is needed for this appeal, it is ORDERED that appellant's motion is granted and this appeal is hereby reinstated. It is (MORE)
03/03/2009RECEIVED - (MOTION FOR APPEAL TRANSCRIPT) (NO-RT NEEDED FOR THIS APPEAL)
03/03/2009 FURTHER ORDERED that a briefing order will be issued upon the filing in this court, by the Clerk of the Superior Court, of the record index and record copies in accordance with D.C. App. R. 11 (b)(3)(A). (ETW) elp
03/23/2009RECORD INDEX
03/23/2009RECORD COPIES
03/23/2009RECORD COMPLETED
03/23/2009 It appearing that the complete record on appeal has been filed with this court, it is ORDERED that appellant's brief and the limited appendix including the documents required by D.C. App. R. 30 (f), shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and appellees' brief shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 31. (GP) elp
04/30/2009APPELLANT'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF
05/13/2009 On consideration of appellant's motion for an extension of time within which to file the brief and the limited appendix, to which no opposition has been filed, it is ORDERED that the motion is granted and appellant's brief and the limited appendix shall be filed within 30 days from the date of this order. (GP) elp
06/11/2009APPELLANT'S BRIEF
06/11/2009APPENDIX to Appellant's Brief.
07/21/2009 It appearing that the brief of appellant and the limited appendix were filed with this court on June 11, 2009, and it further appearing that the brief of appellees were due to be filed on or before July 16, 2009, (See D.C. App. R. 31), but the brief has not been filed, it is ORDERED that appellees shall within 20 days from the date of this order submit the brief, accompanied by a motion for leave to file out of time. The motion should set forth good cause for the failure either to timely file the brief, or to request an extension of time within which to do so. (GP) elp
08/03/2009APPELLEE'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF (d.c.) 30 day
08/19/2009 On consideration of appellees' motion for an extension of time within which to file the brief, to which no opposition has been filed, it is ORDERED that the motion is granted and appellees' brief shall be filed on or before September 9, 2009. (GP) elp
09/09/2009APPELLEE'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY AFFIRMANCE W/ appendix (D.C.)
09/10/2009TMC - motion for summary affirmance - appellant's brief/appendix
09/24/2009 ORDERED that APPELLEE'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY AFFIRMANCE IS GRANTED. Oliver T. Carr Mgm't Inc. v Nat'l Deli Inc. 397 A.2d 914, 915 (DC 1979)(standard for summary affirmance);... It is *****MORE******
09/24/2009 FURTHER ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the order on appeal be and HEREBY IS AFFIRMED. (RDOBNW)
10/08/2009APLT MO TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE PET FOR REHEARING to October 9, 2009
10/09/2009RECEIVED appellant's petition for rehearing
11/03/2009APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR STAY- of proceedings
11/10/2009APPELLANT'S PETITION FOR REHEARING
11/10/2009ORDER DENYING APPELLANT'S PETITION FOR REHEARING AND DENY APLT'S MOTION FOR STAY AS MOOT. Further Ordered that aplt's mo to extend time to file petition is granted and the Clerk is directed to file the lodged petition. (RD,OB,NW)
11/17/2009APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR STAY- mandate
11/24/2009ORDER DENYING APPELLANT MOTION FOR STAY (Reid, Oberly, Newman)
11/25/2009MANDATE ISSUED
05/05/2014FiledArchived