judyrecords
search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

District Of Columbia Court Of Appeals Record

JOYCE EVANS V. TENACITY 919 L STREET, LLC

Case Information: 06-CV-1550
Short Caption:JOYCE EVANS V. TENACITY 919 L STREET, LLCClassification:Appeals - Civil - Landlord And Tenant
Lead:06-CV-1550Consolidated: 06-CV-1580
Superior Court or Agency Case Number:CAB4685-06Filed Date:08/19/2006

Opening Event Date:08/19/2006Case Status:Closed
Record Completed:Post-Decision Matter Pending:
Briefs Completed:
Argued/Submitted:
Disposition:Next Scheduled Action:
Mandate Issued:04/05/2007
Costs Waived

Party Information
Appellate RoleParty NameIFPAttorney(s)Arguing AttorneyE-Filer
AppellantJoyce Evans Y
Andre P. BarberYN
AppelleeTenacity 919 L Street LLCN
Julianne E. DymowskiNY

Events
Event DateStatusDescriptionResult
08/19/2006NOTICE OF APPEAL
01/25/2007 On consideration of the notice of appeal filed in this case on August 19, 2006, and it appearing that appellant was granted in forma pauperis status in the trial court, and it further appearing that transcript may be needed for this appeal, it is ORDERED that appellant shall within 20 days from the date of this order file with the Appeals Coordinator's Office a request for preparation of transcripts of proceedings in the Superior Court, on motion with notice, to the appropriate motions or trial judge, for determination in accordance with Hancock v. Mutual of Omaha Ins. Co., 472 A.2d 867 (D.C. 1984). See D.C. App. R. 10 (b)(5)(A). It is FURTHER ORDERED that appellant shall simultaneously submit a file stamped copy of that motion with this court, it is FURTHER ORDERED that appellant's failure to respond to any order of this court, including this order, shall subject this appeal to dismissal without further notice for lack of prosecution. See D.C. App. R. 13(a). (GP) elp
02/08/2007ORDER, SUA SPONTE, CONSOLIDATING APPEALS NOS. 06-CV-1550 and 06-CV-1580 are CONSOLIDATED for all purposes. It is *****MORE*****
02/08/2007 FURTHER ORDERED that appellant shall within 20 days from the date of this order SHOW CAUSE why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction as having been taken from a non-final order of the Superior Court. See Umana v. Swidler & Berlin, 669 A.2d 717 (D.C. 1995). (BY: ETW) lw
02/08/2007TMC - OTSC - ROTSC
02/15/2007RECEIVED motion for appeal transcript. (RT-NEEDED/RT-ORDERED for 6/19/06, 7/7/06 & 7/20/06) (elp)
02/28/2007RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE (for both appeals)
03/14/2007 ORDERED that THESE APPEALS are HEREBY DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction as having been taken from a non-final and non-appealable order. (KRPRST)
03/14/2007DISMISSED
03/23/2007APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION of order dismissing appeal
03/26/2007TMC - appellant's motion for reconsideration
03/28/2007ORDER DENY APPELLANT MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (KRPRST)
04/05/2007MANDATE ISSUED
10/25/2007error