Case Information: 06-CV-1550 | |||
Short Caption: | JOYCE EVANS V. TENACITY 919 L STREET, LLC | Classification: | Appeals - Civil - Landlord And Tenant |
Lead: | 06-CV-1550 | Consolidated: | 06-CV-1580 |
Superior Court or Agency Case Number: | CAB4685-06 | Filed Date: | 08/19/2006 |
| |||
Opening Event Date: | 08/19/2006 | Case Status: | Closed |
Record Completed: | Post-Decision Matter Pending: | ||
Briefs Completed: | |||
Argued/Submitted: | |||
Disposition: | Next Scheduled Action: | ||
Mandate Issued: | 04/05/2007 | ||
Costs Waived |
Party Information | |||||||||
Appellate Role | Party Name | IFP | Attorney(s) | Arguing Attorney | E-Filer | ||||
Appellant | Joyce Evans | Y |
| ||||||
Appellee | Tenacity 919 L Street LLC | N |
|
Events | ||||
Event Date | Status | Description | Result | |
08/19/2006 | NOTICE OF APPEAL | |||
01/25/2007 | On consideration of the notice of appeal filed in this case on August 19, 2006, and it appearing that appellant was granted in forma pauperis status in the trial court, and it further appearing that transcript may be needed for this appeal, it is ORDERED that appellant shall within 20 days from the date of this order file with the Appeals Coordinator's Office a request for preparation of transcripts of proceedings in the Superior Court, on motion with notice, to the appropriate motions or trial judge, for determination in accordance with Hancock v. Mutual of Omaha Ins. Co., 472 A.2d 867 (D.C. 1984). See D.C. App. R. 10 (b)(5)(A). It is FURTHER ORDERED that appellant shall simultaneously submit a file stamped copy of that motion with this court, it is FURTHER ORDERED that appellant's failure to respond to any order of this court, including this order, shall subject this appeal to dismissal without further notice for lack of prosecution. See D.C. App. R. 13(a). (GP) elp | |||
02/08/2007 | ORDER, SUA SPONTE, CONSOLIDATING APPEALS NOS. 06-CV-1550 and 06-CV-1580 are CONSOLIDATED for all purposes. It is *****MORE***** | |||
02/08/2007 | FURTHER ORDERED that appellant shall within 20 days from the date of this order SHOW CAUSE why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction as having been taken from a non-final order of the Superior Court. See Umana v. Swidler & Berlin, 669 A.2d 717 (D.C. 1995). (BY: ETW) lw | |||
02/08/2007 | TMC - OTSC - ROTSC | |||
02/15/2007 | RECEIVED motion for appeal transcript. (RT-NEEDED/RT-ORDERED for 6/19/06, 7/7/06 & 7/20/06) (elp) | |||
02/28/2007 | RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE (for both appeals) | |||
03/14/2007 | ORDERED that THESE APPEALS are HEREBY DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction as having been taken from a non-final and non-appealable order. (KRPRST) | |||
03/14/2007 | DISMISSED | |||
03/23/2007 | APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION of order dismissing appeal | |||
03/26/2007 | TMC - appellant's motion for reconsideration | |||
03/28/2007 | ORDER DENY APPELLANT MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (KRPRST) | |||
04/05/2007 | MANDATE ISSUED | |||
10/25/2007 | error |