judyrecords
search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

District Of Columbia Court Of Appeals Record

JEROME A. SMITH V. HYATT REGENCY HOTEL

Case Information: 07-AA-0016
Short Caption:JEROME A. SMITH V. HYATT REGENCY HOTELClassification:Agency - Administrative Agency - Employment Services
Superior Court or Agency Case Number:ESP106185-06Filed Date:01/17/2007

Opening Event Date:01/17/2007Case Status:Closed
Record Completed:03/14/2007Post-Decision Matter Pending:
Briefs Completed:07/17/2007
Argued/Submitted:02/21/2008
Disposition:Next Scheduled Action:
Mandate Issued:03/20/2008
Costs Waived

Party Information
Appellate RoleParty NameIFPAttorney(s)Arguing AttorneyE-Filer
PetitionerJerome A. Smith YPro SeN
RespondentHyatt Regency HotelNPro SeN

Events
Event DateStatusDescriptionResult
01/17/2007PETITION FOR REVIEW (nunc pro tunc)
01/17/2007PETITIONER'S MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
01/24/2007ORDER GRANT PTNR MO TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, and the Clerk shall file the lodged petition for review nunc pro tunc to January 17, 2007. F/ORDERED that Office of Administrative Hearings shall file the record within 60 days from the date of this order. See D.C. App. R. 17. If a hearing was held, the record should include either a certified copy of the transcript of any testimony before the agency or a certified narrative statement of relevant proceedings and evidence in accordance with D.C. App. R. 16 (a)(4). FURTHER ORDERED that respondent shall within 30 days from the date of this order advise this court as to the identity of its counsel. See Moore Energy Resources, Inc. v. Public Serv. Comm'n of the District of Columbia, 785 A.2d 300, 304 (D.C. 2001); D.C. App. R. 15 (a)(5). (ETW)
03/14/2007 On consideration of this court's order of January 24, 2007, directing respondent to identify its counsel within 30 days from the date of the order, and it appearing that respondent has failed to comply with the order, it is ORDERED that respondent shall within 15 days from the date of this order advise this court as to the identity of its counsel. See Moore Energy Resources, Inc. v. Public Serv. Comm'n of the District of Columbia, 785 A.2d 300, 304 (D.C. 2001); D.C. App. R. 15 (a)(5). Failure to comply with this order shall result in respondent being prohibited from filing its brief. (ETW)
03/14/2007RECORD ON APPEAL
03/14/2007RECORD COMPLETED
03/20/2007 It appearing that the complete record on appeal has been filed with this court, it is ORDERED that petitioner's brief and the limited appendix, as required by D.C. App. R. 30(f), shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and respondent's brief shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 30, 31. (GP)
03/30/2007PETITIONER'S BRIEF no appendix
04/03/2007 It appearing that the brief of petitioner was filed with this court on March 30, 2007, and it further appearing that the appendix was due to be filed on or before April 30, 2007 and has not been filed, (See D.C. App. R. 30, 31.), it is ORDERED that petitioner shall within 15 days from the date of this order submit the appendix, accompanied by a motion for leave to file out of time. The motion should set forth good cause for the failure either to timely file the appendix or to request an extension of time within which to do so. Failure to comply with this order shall subject this appeal to dismissal without further notice. See D.C. App. R. 13. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the brief of respondent shall be filed within 30 days from the date the appendix is filed with this court. (GP)
05/02/2007 On consideration of this court's order of April 3, 2007, directing petitioner to submit the appendix within 15 days from the date of the order, and it appearing that that appendix has not yet been filed with this court, it is ORDERED that petitioner shall within 15 days from the date of this order submit the limited appendix, accompanied by a motion for leave to file out of time. The motion should set forth good cause for the failure either to timely file the appendix or to request an extension of time within which to do so. Failure to comply with this order shall subject this appeal to dismissal without further notice. It is FURTHER ORDERED that appellee's brief shall be filed within 30 days from the date the appendix is filed with this court. (GP)
05/11/2007RECEIVED Appendix to Petitioner's Brief.
05/11/2007MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE APPENDIX of Petitioner.
05/31/2007 On consideration of petitioner's motion for leave to file the lodged limited appendix, to which no opposition has been filed, it is ORDERED that petitioner's motion is granted and the lodged limited appendix is filed. It is FURTHER ORDERED that respondent's brief shall be filed within 30 days from the date of this order. (GP)
05/31/2007APPENDIX
07/17/2007 On consideration of this court's order of March 14, 2007, which directed respondent to identify its counsel, and it appearing that respondent has failed to comply with the order, and it further appearing that respondent's brief was due to be filed on or before July 2, 2007, but the brief has not been filed with this court, it is ORDERED that this petition for review shall be scheduled for consideration before a merits division of this court on the record and on petitioner's brief alone. (ETW)
07/17/2007BRIEFS COMPLETED
08/01/2007FINAL SCREENING - SUMMARY CALENDAR I
12/20/2007CALENDAR NOTICE SENT
02/21/2008FiledACTION - Argued / Submitted
02/21/2008SUBMITTED to Judges Glickman, Kern, Belson
02/27/2008AFFIRMED MOJ (Glickman, Kern, Belson)
03/20/2008MANDATE ISSUED