judyrecords
search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

District Of Columbia Court Of Appeals Record

ANTHONY M. LANIER V. UNITED STATES

Case Information: 07-CM-0011
Short Caption:ANTHONY M. LANIER V. UNITED STATESClassification:Appeals - Criminal Misdemeanor - Domestic Violence
Superior Court or Agency Case Number:DVM1972-06Filed Date:01/08/2007

Opening Event Date:01/08/2007Case Status:Closed
Record Completed:07/11/2007Post-Decision Matter Pending:
Briefs Completed:12/19/2007
Argued/Submitted:05/22/2008
Disposition:Next Scheduled Action:
Mandate Issued:06/19/2008
Costs Waived

Party Information
Appellate RoleParty NameIFPAttorney(s)Arguing AttorneyE-Filer
AppellantAnthony M. Lanier Y
Regina V. WagnerYY
AppelleeUnited StatesN
Roy W. McLeese, IIINN

Events
Event DateStatusDescriptionResult
01/08/2007NOTICE OF APPEAL
01/18/2007 On consideration of the notice of appeal and it appearing that appellant has been found eligible for court appointed counsel, it is ORDERED that Glen Koontz, Esquire, is hereby appointed to represent appellant in this appeal. It is FURTHER ORDERED that counsel for appellant shall immediately take the necessary steps to review the trial court record and to ensure that the transcripts necessary to the appeal have been ordered and shall, within 30 days from the date of this order complete and file with this court a single copy of the attached statement regarding the transcript ordered for this appeal. Where transcript(s) necessary for this appeal have been ordered and completed for non-appeal purposes, appellant must advise the Court Reporting and Recording Division to forward said transcript(s) for inclusion in the record on appeal. (By: GP)
01/18/2007APPOINTING COUNSEL/COURT ORDER REFERRAL (CJA) Glen Koontz, Esquire
02/16/2007MOT TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE STMT RE TRANSCRIPT March 9, 2007 (no oppo)
02/21/2007 On consideration of appellant's motion for an extension of time within which to file the statement regarding transcript, to which no opposition has been filed, it is ORDERED that appellant's motion is granted, and the statement regarding transcript shall be filed with this court on or before March 9, 2007. (By: GP)
03/22/2007 On consideration of this court's order of February 21, 2007, granting appellant's motion for an extension of time to file the statement regarding transcript on or before March 9, 2007, and it appearing that the statement regarding transcript has not been filed, it is ORDERED that counsel for appellant shall within 15 days from the date of this order submit the statement regarding transcript, accompanied by a motion for leave to file out of time. The motion should set forth good cause for the failure either to timely file the document or to request an extension of time within which to do so. (GP)
04/06/2007RECEIVED - statement regarding transcript
04/06/2007MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE STATEMENT RE TRANSCRIPT no oppo
04/12/2007 On consideration of appellant's motion for leave to file the lodged statement regarding transcript, it is ORDERED that appellant's motion is granted and the lodged statement regarding transcript is filed. (By: GP)
04/12/2007STATEMENT REGARDING TRANSCRIPT(S) (rt ordered)dfe
07/11/2007RECORD COPIES
07/11/2007RECORD INDEX
07/11/2007SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD - #1 (117 pgs/tape) 12/8/06 proc.
07/11/2007RECORD COMPLETED
07/13/2007 It appearing that the complete record on appeal has been filed with this court, it is ORDERED that appellant's brief and the limited appendix including the documents required by D.C. App. R. 30 (f), shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and appellee's brief shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 31. (GP)
08/20/2007APPELLANT'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF for 60 days (no oppo)
09/05/2007 On consideration of appellant's motion for an extension of time within which to file the brief, to which no opposition has been filed, it is ORDERED that the motion is granted, and appellant's brief and the limited appendix shall be filed on or before October 22, 2007. (By: GP)
10/02/2007COUNSEL'S MOTION TO WITHDRAW FOR BUSINESS REASONS Granted
10/03/2007TMC - counsel's motion to withdraw (KOONTZ)
10/04/2007 ORDERED that the MOTION of counsel IS GRANTED and the APPOINTMENT of Glen Koontz, Esq., IS HEREBY VACATED, and Regina Michaels, Esquire, IS APPOINTED to represent appellant herein. Glen Koontz, Esq., shall transmit all documents pertaining to this appeal to newly-appointed counsel forthwith. It is *****MORE*****
10/04/2007 FURTHER ORDERED that appellant's brief and the limited appendix including the documents required by D.C. App. R. 30 (f), shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and appellee's brief shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 31. (KRFINE)
10/04/2007APPOINTING COUNSEL/COURT ORDER REFERRAL (CJA) REGINA MICHAELS
11/06/2007APPELLANT'S BRIEF
11/06/2007APPENDIX
11/06/2007APPELLEE'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF until December 6, 2007 (no oppo)
12/10/2007RECEIVED - aple's brief
12/19/2007 On consideration of appellee's motion for an extension of time within which to file the brief, to which no opposition has been filed, and the lodged brief, it is ORDERED that appellee's motion is granted and the lodged brief is filed. It is FURTHER ORDERED that this appeal shall be scheduled for consideration before a merits division as soon as the calendar permits. (By: GP)
12/19/2007APPELLEE'S BRIEF
12/19/2007BRIEFS COMPLETED
01/02/2008APPELLANT'S REPLY BRIEF
01/16/2008FINAL SCREENING - SUMMARY CALENDAR I
03/20/2008CALENDAR NOTICE SENT
05/22/2008FiledACTION - Argued / Submitted
05/22/2008SUBMITTED to Judges Reid, Fisher, Nebeker
05/27/2008AFFIRMED MOJ (Reid, Fisher, Nebeker)
06/06/2008APPELLEE'S MISCELLANEOUS SUBSTANTIVE MOTION to publish
06/18/2008APPELLANT'S OPPOSITION - to motion to publish
06/19/2008MANDATE ISSUED
07/23/2008On consideration of appellee's motion t publish this court's Memorandum Opinion and Judgment in the above matter filed May 27, 2008, and appellant's opposition thereto, it is ORDERED that the motion to publish is denied. (RD,FI,NE) *Senior Judge NE would grant appellee's motion.
08/10/2011FiledArchived