Case Information: 08-CT-0162 | |||
Short Caption: | ANTOINE ROBINSON V. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA | Classification: | Appeals - Criminal - DC - DC Non-Traffic |
Superior Court or Agency Case Number: | CDC17068-07 | Filed Date: | 01/31/2008 |
| |||
Opening Event Date: | 01/31/2008 | Case Status: | Closed |
Record Completed: | 09/03/2008 | Post-Decision Matter Pending: | |
Briefs Completed: | |||
Argued/Submitted: | |||
Disposition: | Next Scheduled Action: | ||
Mandate Issued: | 03/04/2009 | ||
Costs Waived |
Party Information | |||||||||
Appellate Role | Party Name | IFP | Attorney(s) | Arguing Attorney | E-Filer | ||||
Appellant | Antoine Robinson | Y |
| ||||||
Appellee | District of Columbia | N |
|
Events | ||||
Event Date | Status | Description | Result | |
01/31/2008 | NOTICE OF APPEAL | |||
03/12/2008 | On consideration of the notice of appeal and it appearing that appellant has been found eligible for court appointed counsel, it is ORDERED that David Stringer, Esquire, is hereby appointed to represent appellant in this appeal. It is FURTHER ORDERED that counsel for appellant shall immediately take the necessary steps to review the trial court record and to ensure that the transcripts necessary to the appeal have been ordered and shall, within 30 days from the date of this order complete and file with this court a single copy of the attached statement regarding the transcript ordered for this appeal. Where transcript(s) necessary for this appeal have been ordered and completed for non-appeal purposes, appellant must advise the Court Reporting and Recording Division to forward said transcript(s) for inclusion in the record on appeal. (By: GP) | |||
03/12/2008 | APPOINTING COUNSEL/COURT ORDER REFERRAL (CJA) David Stringer, Esquire | |||
03/25/2008 | STATEMENT REGARDING TRANSCRIPT(S) (rt ordered)dfe | |||
07/22/2008 | SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD - #1 (80pgs/Tape) 1/15/08 proc. | |||
09/03/2008 | RECORD INDEX | |||
09/03/2008 | RECORD COPIES | |||
09/03/2008 | RECORD COMPLETED | |||
09/26/2008 | It appearing that the complete record on appeal has been filed with this court, it is ORDERED that appellant's brief and the limited appendix including the documents required by D.C. App. R. 30 (f), shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and appellee's brief shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 31. (GP) | |||
11/17/2008 | On consideration of this court's order of September 26, 2008, directing counsel for appellant to file the brief, and the limited appendix as required by D.C.App. R. 30 (f), within 40 days and it appearing that the brief and the appendix have not been filed, it is ORDERED that the brief of appellant and the limited appendix shall be submitted within 20 days from the date of this order, accompanied by a motion for leave to file out of time. The motion should set forth good cause for the failure either to timely file the documents or to request an extension of time within which to do so. (GP) | |||
12/08/2008 | APPELLANT'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF for 10 days (no oppo) | |||
12/12/2008 | ` | |||
12/16/2008 | On consideration of appellant's motion for an extension of time within which to file the brief, to which no opposition has been filed, it is ORDERED that the motion is granted, and appellant's brief and the limited appendix shall be filed on or before December 18, 2008. (By: GP) | |||
12/17/2008 | APPELLANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS/WITHDRAW APPEAL | |||
01/06/2009 | ORDER DENY APLT MOTION TO DISMISS/WITHDRAW APPEAL without prejudice to its renewal accompanied by a statement of appellant pro se in accordance with the requirements of Johnson v. United States, 513 A.2d 798 (D.C. 1986). It is FURTHER ORDERED that counsel for appellant shall, within 20 days from the date of this order, file a new motion to withdraw this appeal, or file the brief and the limited appendix. (By: ETW) | |||
01/26/2009 | APPELLANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS/WITHDRAW APPEAL (with Statement of Appellant attached) | |||
02/10/2009 | ORDER GRANT APLT MOTION TO DISMISS/WITHDRAW APPEAL and this appeal is hereby dismissed. See Johnson v. United States, 513 A.2d 798 (D.C. 1986). (By: ETW) | |||
02/10/2009 | DISMISSED | |||
03/04/2009 | MANDATE ISSUED |