Case Information: 07-CV-0118 | |||
Short Caption: | SCHAGHTICOKE TRIBAL NATION V. BARBOUR GRIFFITH & ROGERS, LLC | Classification: | Appeals - Civil - Other Civil |
Superior Court or Agency Case Number: | CAB5231-06 | Filed Date: | 02/23/2007 |
| |||
Opening Event Date: | 02/23/2007 | Case Status: | Closed |
Record Completed: | Post-Decision Matter Pending: | ||
Briefs Completed: | |||
Argued/Submitted: | |||
Disposition: | Next Scheduled Action: | ||
Mandate Issued: | 04/30/2007 |
Party Information | ||||||||||||
Appellate Role | Party Name | IFP | Attorney(s) | Arguing Attorney | E-Filer | |||||||
Appellant | Schaghticoke Tribal Nation | N |
| |||||||||
Appellee | Barbour Griffith & Roger,LLC | N |
| |||||||||
Appellee | Town Action to Save Kent | N |
| |||||||||
Appellee | Kenneth F. Cooper | N |
|
Events | ||||
Event Date | Status | Description | Result | |
02/23/2007 | NOTICE OF APPEAL | |||
03/06/2007 | APPELLANT'S MOTION TO EXPEDITE APPEAL | |||
03/07/2007 | TMC - OTSC - ROTSC - appellant's motion to expedite - opposition | |||
03/12/2007 | ORDERED that appellant shall within 20 days from the date of this order SHOW CAUSE why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction as having been taken from a non-appealable order and as having been prematurely filed. See D.C. App. R. 4(a)(1); West v. Morris, 711 A.2d 1269 (D.C. 1998). It is *****MORE***** | |||
03/12/2007 | FURTHER ORDERED that appellant's MOTION TO EXPEDITE is HELD IN ABEYANCE pending further order of this court. (BY: ETW) lw | |||
03/12/2007 | APPELLEE'S OPPOSITION to Appellant's motion to expedite appeal (Town Action to Save Kent (TASK) and Kenneth F. Cooper) | |||
03/12/2007 | APPELLEE'S OPPOSITION to Appellant's motion to expedite appeal (Barbour, Griffith & Rogers (BGR)) | |||
03/30/2007 | RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - dated 3/12/07 | |||
04/05/2007 | ORDERED that this APPEAL is HEREBY DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction as having been taken from a non-final and non-appealable order which refuses to lift a discovery stay. Such an order is no appealable under D.C. Code 11-721 (a)(2)(2001) since it does not have the practical effect of an injunction.... see order ****MORE***** | |||
04/05/2007 | FURTHER ORDERED that appellant's MOTION TO EXPEDITE is DENIED AS MOOT. (THSTSC) | |||
04/05/2007 | DISMISSED | |||
04/30/2007 | MANDATE ISSUED |