judyrecords
search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

District Of Columbia Court Of Appeals Record

SCHAGHTICOKE TRIBAL NATION V. BARBOUR GRIFFITH & ROGERS, LLC

Case Information: 07-CV-0118
Short Caption:SCHAGHTICOKE TRIBAL NATION V. BARBOUR GRIFFITH & ROGERS, LLCClassification:Appeals - Civil - Other Civil
Superior Court or Agency Case Number:CAB5231-06Filed Date:02/23/2007

Opening Event Date:02/23/2007Case Status:Closed
Record Completed:Post-Decision Matter Pending:
Briefs Completed:
Argued/Submitted:
Disposition:Next Scheduled Action:
Mandate Issued:04/30/2007

Party Information
Appellate RoleParty NameIFPAttorney(s)Arguing AttorneyE-Filer
AppellantSchaghticoke Tribal NationN
Creighton MagidNY
AppelleeBarbour Griffith & Roger,LLCN
Ryan E. Bull NN
AppelleeTown Action to Save KentN
Wallace A. Christensen NN
Morgan L. Chinoy NN
AppelleeKenneth F. Cooper N
Morgan L. Chinoy NN
Wallace A. Christensen NN

Events
Event DateStatusDescriptionResult
02/23/2007NOTICE OF APPEAL
03/06/2007APPELLANT'S MOTION TO EXPEDITE APPEAL
03/07/2007TMC - OTSC - ROTSC - appellant's motion to expedite - opposition
03/12/2007 ORDERED that appellant shall within 20 days from the date of this order SHOW CAUSE why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction as having been taken from a non-appealable order and as having been prematurely filed. See D.C. App. R. 4(a)(1); West v. Morris, 711 A.2d 1269 (D.C. 1998). It is *****MORE*****
03/12/2007 FURTHER ORDERED that appellant's MOTION TO EXPEDITE is HELD IN ABEYANCE pending further order of this court. (BY: ETW) lw
03/12/2007APPELLEE'S OPPOSITION to Appellant's motion to expedite appeal (Town Action to Save Kent (TASK) and Kenneth F. Cooper)
03/12/2007APPELLEE'S OPPOSITION to Appellant's motion to expedite appeal (Barbour, Griffith & Rogers (BGR))
03/30/2007RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - dated 3/12/07
04/05/2007 ORDERED that this APPEAL is HEREBY DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction as having been taken from a non-final and non-appealable order which refuses to lift a discovery stay. Such an order is no appealable under D.C. Code 11-721 (a)(2)(2001) since it does not have the practical effect of an injunction.... see order ****MORE*****
04/05/2007 FURTHER ORDERED that appellant's MOTION TO EXPEDITE is DENIED AS MOOT. (THSTSC)
04/05/2007DISMISSED
04/30/2007MANDATE ISSUED