| Case Information: 11-CV-0151 | |||
| Short Caption: | DUANE A. JONES V. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, ET AL. | Classification: | Appeals - Civil - Other Civil |
| Superior Court or Agency Case Number: | CAB9568-10 | Filed Date: | 02/07/2011 |
| | |||
| Opening Event Date: | 02/07/2011 | Case Status: | Closed |
| Record Completed: | Post-Decision Matter Pending: | ||
| Briefs Completed: | |||
| Argued/Submitted: | |||
| Disposition: | Next Scheduled Action: | ||
| Mandate Issued: | 06/28/2011 | ||
| Costs Waived | |||
| Party Information | |||||||||
| Appellate Role | Party Name | IFP | Attorney(s) | Arguing Attorney | E-Filer | ||||
| Appellant | Duane A. Jones | Y | Pro Se | N | |||||
| Appellee | District of Columbia | N |
| ||||||
| Appellee | Starbucks Coffee Company | N |
| ||||||
| Appellee | Archdiocese of Washington | N |
| ||||||
| Events | ||||
| Event Date | Status | Description | Result | |
| 02/07/2011 | NOTICE OF APPEAL | |||
| 02/22/2011 | ORDERED that appellant shall, w/n 20 days from the date of this order, SHOW CAUSE why this appeal should not be dismissed EITHER for having been IMPROPERLY FILED as no final order has been designated for review...OR for having been PREMATURELY FILED... (BY:ETW) | |||
| 02/22/2011 | TMC - OTSC - motion for summary affirmance | |||
| 03/23/2011 | APPELLEE'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY AFFIRMANCE (Starbucks) | |||
| 06/06/2011 | ORDERED that this APPEAL IS DISMISSED because appellant failed to designate the order for review... It is ****MORE**** | |||
| 06/06/2011 | FURTHER ORDERED that the MOTION FOR SUMMARY AFFIRMANCE IS DENIED AS MOOT. (FIBEKG) | |||
| 06/06/2011 | DISMISSED | |||
| 06/28/2011 | MANDATE ISSUED | |||