judyrecords
search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

District Of Columbia Court Of Appeals Record

CRAGIN G.L. CURTIS V. CATHERINE FRAZIER CURTIS

Case Information: 06-FM-1581
Short Caption:CRAGIN G.L. CURTIS V. CATHERINE FRAZIER CURTISClassification:Appeals - Family - Domestic Relations
Superior Court or Agency Case Number:DRB3330-00Filed Date:12/12/2006

Opening Event Date:12/12/2006Case Status:Closed
Record Completed:04/27/2007Post-Decision Matter Pending:
Briefs Completed:07/10/2007
Argued/Submitted:04/18/2008
Disposition:Next Scheduled Action:
Mandate Issued:05/29/2008

Party Information
Appellate RoleParty NameIFPAttorney(s)Arguing AttorneyE-Filer
AppellantCragin G.L. Curtis N
Gary A. SteinYN
AppelleeCatherine Frazier Curtis N
Daniel G. Dannenbaum NN
Camellia J. Jacobs YN

Events
Event DateStatusDescriptionResult
12/12/2006NOTICE OF APPEAL
02/01/2007 On consideration of the notice of appeal filed in this case on December 12, 2006, it is ORDERED that appellant shall, within 20 days from the date of this order, complete and file with this court a single copy of the attached statement regarding transcript. Where transcript(s) necessary for this appeal have been ordered and completed for non-appeal purposes, appellant must advise the Court Reporting Division to forward said transcript(s) for inclusion in the record on appeal. If partial transcripts are being ordered, appellant must file a statement of issues to be raised on appeal with this court within 10 days from the date of this order. See D.C. App. R. 10 (b)(3)(A). It is FURTHER ORDERED appellant's failure to respond to any order of this court, including this order, shall subject this appeal to dismissal without further notice for lack of prosecution. See D.C. App. R. 13(a). (GP)
02/20/2007APPEARANCE - of Matthew A. Pavuk as counsel for the aplt
02/21/2007STATEMENT REGARDING TRANSCRIPT(S) 11/1/06 - tape (rt. ordered) - dlm
04/27/2007RECORD INDEX
04/27/2007SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD - #1 (28 pgs/tape) 11/1/06 proc.
04/27/2007RECORD COMPLETED
04/30/2007 It appearing that the complete record on appeal has been filed with this court, it is ORDERED that appellant's brief and the appendix including the documents required by D.C. App. R. 30 (a)(1), shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and appellee's brief shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 31. (dlm)
04/30/2007 It appearing that the complete record on appeal has been filed with this court, it is ORDERED that appellant's brief and the appendix including the documents required by D.C. App. R. 30 (a)(1), shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and appellee's brief shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 31. (GP)
05/15/2007COUNSEL'S MOTION TO WITHDRAW FOR BUSINESS REASONS Granted
06/07/2007 On consideration of the motion of counsle for appellant to withdraw his appearance, to which no opposition has been filed, and it appearing that Matthew A. Pavuk, Esq., has entered his appearance for appellant, and it further appearing that the complete record on appeal has been filed with this court, it is ORDERED that the motion of counsel for appellant is granted and the appearance of Kenneth H. Rosenau, Esq., is hereby vacated. It is (MORE)
06/07/2007 ORDERED that appellant's brief and the appendix including the documents required by D.C. App. R. 30 (a)(1), shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and appellee's brief shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 31. (dlm)
06/11/2007APPELLANT'S BRIEF
06/11/2007APPENDIX
06/28/2007APPEARANCE of Camellia J. Jacobs as retained cousel for aple.
07/10/2007APPELLEE'S BRIEF
07/10/2007BRIEFS COMPLETED
08/01/2007FINAL SCREENING - SUMMARY CALENDAR I
08/06/2007APPELLANT'S REPLY BRIEF
12/20/2007CALENDAR NOTICE SENT
02/07/2008SUBMITTED to Judges Reid, Kramer, Schwelb
02/12/2008ORDER - On consideration of the notice of appeal filed on December 12, 2006, from an order entered on November 13, 2006, and it appearing that this appeal has been taken from a non-final order of the Superior Court, it is ORDERED that appellant shall within 20 days from the date of this order show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction as having been taken from a non-final order of the Superior Court. See D.C. Code 11-721 (2001). (RD,KR,SC)
03/03/2008APPEARANCE - of Gary A. Stein and the firm of Ain & Stein, LLC to represent aplt and withdrawing Pavuk
03/14/2008CHANGE OF ADDRESS RECEIVED - for aple's counsel Daniel G. Dannenbaum as follows: Dannenbaum Law Firm PLLC 2300 Clarendon Blvd, Ste 700 Arlington, VA 22207
03/19/2008ORDER - On consideration of this court's order of February 12, 2008, it is ORDERED, sua sponte, that this matter is scheduled for argument as a special sitting on Friday, April 18, 2008, at 10:30 a.m. at argument the parties are to be prepared to discuss the merits of the appeal as well as the jurisdictional issue. See Sup.Ct. Dom.Rel R.6(c); D.C. Sup. Ct. Dom Rel R. 60(c), and D.C. App.R.4(a)(4)(v). (RD,KR,SC)
04/07/2008RECEIVED- advisory to the court of appeals and aplt's position regarding the jurisdiction on this court (response to show cause)
04/14/2008RECEIVED - aplt's corrected certificate of service re: jurisdiction of this court
04/18/2008FiledACTION - Argued / Submitted
04/18/2008ARGUED before Judges Reid, Kramer, Schwelb Gary A. Stein, Esq. for Appellant Camellia J. Jacobs, Esq. for Appellee
04/21/2008AMICUS CURIAE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE BRIEF
04/21/2008RECEIVED - amicus curiae brief
04/22/2008LETTER - from amicus curiae re: typographical errors made in the amicus brief
04/22/2008AFFIRMED MOJ (Reid, Kramer, Schwelb), with separate concurrence by Judge Schwelb.
04/23/2008APPELLANT'S OPPOSITION - to Mr. Frazaier's motion for leave to file amicus curiae brief after oral argument
04/28/2008APPELLANT'S PETITION FOR REHEARING
05/05/2008APPELLEE'S ANSWER/RESPONSE-to aplt's oppo to his motion for leave to file amicus brief
05/14/2008ORDER - On consideration of the motion of Thomas Frazier, Jr., for leave to file the lodged amicus brief, and appellant's opposition thereto, and it appearing that this matter was resolved by the court's memorandum opinion and judgment of April 22, 2008, it is ORDERED that the motion is denied as moot. (RD,KR,SC)
05/20/2008ORDER DENYING APPELLANT'S PETITION FOR REHEARING (RD,KR,SC)
05/29/2008MANDATE ISSUED
08/14/2008error
08/14/2008error