Events |
Event Date | Status | Description | Result |
12/12/2006 | | NOTICE OF APPEAL | |
02/01/2007 | | On consideration of the notice of appeal filed in this case on December 12, 2006, it is ORDERED that appellant shall, within 20 days from the date of this order, complete and file with this court a single copy of the attached statement regarding transcript. Where transcript(s) necessary for this appeal have been ordered and completed for non-appeal purposes, appellant must advise the Court Reporting Division to forward said transcript(s) for inclusion in the record on appeal. If partial transcripts are being ordered, appellant must file a statement of issues to be raised on appeal with this court within 10 days from the date of this order. See D.C. App. R. 10 (b)(3)(A). It is FURTHER ORDERED appellant's failure to respond to any order of this court, including this order, shall subject this appeal to dismissal without further notice for lack of prosecution. See D.C. App. R. 13(a). (GP) | |
02/20/2007 | | APPEARANCE - of Matthew A. Pavuk as counsel for the aplt | |
02/21/2007 | | STATEMENT REGARDING TRANSCRIPT(S) 11/1/06 - tape (rt. ordered) - dlm | |
04/27/2007 | | RECORD INDEX | |
04/27/2007 | | SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD - #1 (28 pgs/tape) 11/1/06 proc. | |
04/27/2007 | | RECORD COMPLETED | |
04/30/2007 | | It appearing that the complete record on appeal has been filed with this court, it is ORDERED that appellant's brief and the appendix including the documents required by D.C. App. R. 30 (a)(1), shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and appellee's brief shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 31. (dlm) | |
04/30/2007 | | It appearing that the complete record on appeal has been filed with this court, it is ORDERED that appellant's brief and the appendix including the documents required by D.C. App. R. 30 (a)(1), shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and appellee's brief shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 31. (GP) | |
05/15/2007 | | COUNSEL'S MOTION TO WITHDRAW FOR BUSINESS REASONS | Granted |
06/07/2007 | | On consideration of the motion of counsle for appellant to withdraw his appearance, to which no opposition has been filed, and it appearing that Matthew A. Pavuk, Esq., has entered his appearance for appellant, and it further appearing that the complete record on appeal has been filed with this court, it is ORDERED that the motion of counsel for appellant is granted and the appearance of Kenneth H. Rosenau, Esq., is hereby vacated. It is (MORE) | |
06/07/2007 | | ORDERED that appellant's brief and the appendix including the documents required by D.C. App. R. 30 (a)(1), shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and appellee's brief shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 31. (dlm) | |
06/11/2007 | | APPELLANT'S BRIEF | |
06/11/2007 | | APPENDIX | |
06/28/2007 | | APPEARANCE of Camellia J. Jacobs as retained cousel for aple. | |
07/10/2007 | | APPELLEE'S BRIEF | |
07/10/2007 | | BRIEFS COMPLETED | |
08/01/2007 | | FINAL SCREENING - SUMMARY CALENDAR I | |
08/06/2007 | | APPELLANT'S REPLY BRIEF | |
12/20/2007 | | CALENDAR NOTICE SENT | |
02/07/2008 | | SUBMITTED to Judges Reid, Kramer, Schwelb | |
02/12/2008 | | ORDER - On consideration of the notice of appeal filed on December 12, 2006, from an order entered on November 13, 2006, and it appearing that this appeal has been taken from a non-final order of the Superior Court, it is ORDERED that appellant shall within 20 days from the date of this order show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction as having been taken from a non-final order of the Superior Court. See D.C. Code 11-721 (2001). (RD,KR,SC) | |
03/03/2008 | | APPEARANCE - of Gary A. Stein and the firm of Ain & Stein, LLC to represent aplt and withdrawing Pavuk | |
03/14/2008 | | CHANGE OF ADDRESS RECEIVED - for aple's counsel Daniel G. Dannenbaum as follows: Dannenbaum Law Firm PLLC 2300 Clarendon Blvd, Ste 700 Arlington, VA 22207 | |
03/19/2008 | | ORDER - On consideration of this court's order of February 12, 2008, it is ORDERED, sua sponte, that this matter is scheduled for argument as a special sitting on Friday, April 18, 2008, at 10:30 a.m. at argument the parties are to be prepared to discuss the merits of the appeal as well as the jurisdictional issue. See Sup.Ct. Dom.Rel R.6(c); D.C. Sup. Ct. Dom Rel R. 60(c), and D.C. App.R.4(a)(4)(v). (RD,KR,SC) | |
04/07/2008 | | RECEIVED- advisory to the court of appeals and aplt's position regarding the jurisdiction on this court (response to show cause) | |
04/14/2008 | | RECEIVED - aplt's corrected certificate of service re: jurisdiction of this court | |
04/18/2008 | Filed | ACTION - Argued / Submitted | |
04/18/2008 | | ARGUED before Judges Reid, Kramer, Schwelb Gary A. Stein, Esq. for Appellant Camellia J. Jacobs, Esq. for Appellee | |
04/21/2008 | | AMICUS CURIAE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE BRIEF | |
04/21/2008 | | RECEIVED - amicus curiae brief | |
04/22/2008 | | LETTER - from amicus curiae re: typographical errors made in the amicus brief | |
04/22/2008 | | AFFIRMED MOJ (Reid, Kramer, Schwelb), with separate concurrence by Judge Schwelb. | |
04/23/2008 | | APPELLANT'S OPPOSITION - to Mr. Frazaier's motion for leave to file amicus curiae brief after oral argument | |
04/28/2008 | | APPELLANT'S PETITION FOR REHEARING | |
05/05/2008 | | APPELLEE'S ANSWER/RESPONSE-to aplt's oppo to his motion for leave to file amicus brief | |
05/14/2008 | | ORDER - On consideration of the motion of Thomas Frazier, Jr., for leave to file the lodged amicus brief, and appellant's opposition thereto, and it appearing that this matter was resolved by the court's memorandum opinion and judgment of April 22, 2008, it is ORDERED that the motion is denied as moot. (RD,KR,SC) | |
05/20/2008 | | ORDER DENYING APPELLANT'S PETITION FOR REHEARING (RD,KR,SC) | |
05/29/2008 | | MANDATE ISSUED | |
08/14/2008 | | error | |
08/14/2008 | | error | |