judyrecords
search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

District Of Columbia Court Of Appeals Record

JOSE N. CRUZ V. UNITED STATES

Case Information: 06-CF-0012
Short Caption:JOSE N. CRUZ V. UNITED STATESClassification:Appeals - Criminal Felony - Drug Related
Superior Court or Agency Case Number:FEL1522-05Filed Date:01/03/2006

Opening Event Date:01/03/2006Case Status:Closed
Record Completed:04/10/2006Post-Decision Matter Pending:
Briefs Completed:04/18/2007
Argued/Submitted:01/15/2008
Disposition:Next Scheduled Action:
Mandate Issued:02/27/2008
Costs Waived

Party Information
Appellate RoleParty NameIFPAttorney(s)Arguing AttorneyE-Filer
AppellantJose N. Cruz YPro SeN
AppelleeUnited StatesN
Roy W. McLeese, IIINN
Leslie Ann Gerardo YN
Florence Pan NN

Events
Event DateStatusDescriptionResult
01/03/2006NOTICE OF APPEAL
01/19/2006 On consideration of the notice of appeal and it appearing that appellant has been found eligible for court appointed counsel, it is ORDERED that James W. Klein, Esquire, is hereby appointed to represent appellant in this appeal. It is FURTHER ORDERED that counsel for appellant shall immediately take the necessary steps to review the trial court record and to ensure that the transcripts necessary to the appeal have been ordered and shall, within 30 days from the date of this order complete and file with this court a single copy of the attached statement regarding the transcript ordered for this appeal. Where transcript(s) necessary for this appeal have been ordered and completed for non-appeal purposes, appellant must advise the Court Reporting and Recording Division to forward said transcript(s) for inclusion in the record on appeal. (GP)
02/03/2006STATEMENT REGARDING TRANSCRIPT(S) (RT ordered/needed (pii))
04/10/2006RECORD INDEX
04/10/2006RECORD COPIES
04/10/2006SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD - #1 (82 pgs/Coney) 10/3/05 proc.
04/10/2006RECORD COMPLETED
04/13/2006 It appearing that the complete record on appeal has been filed with this court, it is ORDERED that appellant's brief and the limited appendix including the documents required by D.C. App. R. 30 (f), shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and appellee's brief shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 31. (GP)
05/23/2006APPELLANT'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF until August 21, 2006 (no oppo)
05/24/2006SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD - #2 (10 pgs/tape) 12/7/05 proc.
05/25/2006 On consideration of appellant's motion for an extension of time within which to file the brief, to which no opposition has been filed, it is ORDERED that the motion is granted, and appellant's brief and the limited appendix shall be filed on or before August 21, 2006. (GP)
08/21/2006APPELLANT'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF to 30 days. no oppo
08/23/2006 On consideration of appellant's unopposed motion for an extension of time within which to file the brief, it is ORDERED that the motion is granted and appellant's brief and limited appendix shall be filed on or before September 20, 2006. Any further requests for extensions of time will be looked upon with disfavor and granted only upon a showing of good cause. (GP)
09/20/2006APPELLANT'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF to 90 days. no oppo
09/28/2006ORDERED that the motion is granted and appellant's brief and the limited appendix shall be filed on or before December 19, 2006. No further requests for extensions of time will be granted absent a showing of good cause. (ETW)
12/19/2006APPELLANT'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF no oppo 90 days
01/04/2007 On consideration of appellant's unopposed motion for an extensionof time within which to file the brief and the limited appendix, it is ORDERED that the motion is granted and appellant's brief and the limited appendix shall be filed on or before March 19, 2007. No further requests for extensions of time will be granted absent a showing of good cause. (ETW)
03/19/2007APPELLANT'S BRIEF
03/19/2007APPENDIX attached to Appellant's Brief.
04/18/2007APPELLEE'S BRIEF
04/18/2007BRIEFS COMPLETED
09/13/2007FINAL SCREENING - REGULAR CALENDAR
10/18/2007 It appearing that this appeal is likely to be calendared for argument during the months of January 2008 thru March 2008, it is ORDERED that counsel shall advise this court in writing by November 21, 2007 of specific dates during that period when they are unavailable so that the court can attempt to avoid such dates in scheduling argument. Counsel must continue to advise the court of availabilities for subsequent months until this case is in fact set for argument. Note that the calendar is prepared approximately two months in advance, e.g. January calendar set for release at the end of November. The court does not encourage the filing of motions to postpone a scheduled argument. If you do seek a change in a scheduled argument date, your motion should both indicate the opponent's position with respect to your request and alternative dates when you and opposing counsel would be available. You may call the Calendar Clerk prior to filing such a motion for information on dates in the scheduled month when the courtroom is available.(aj) Garland Pinkston, Jr. Clerk
11/20/2007LETTER FROM COUNSEL/PARTY RE FUTURE CALENDARING
11/30/2007CALENDAR NOTICE SENT
01/02/2008APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE REPLY BRIEF no oppo
01/02/2008RECEIVED - aplt's reply brief
01/11/2008LETTER - from aplt re: reply brief and language
01/15/2008FiledACTION - Argued / Submitted
01/15/2008ARGUED before Washington,Reid,Thompson. Shilpa S.Satoskar Esq.,for appellant Jose Cruz. Leslie Ann Gerardo Esq.,for appellee.
01/15/2008ORDER GRANT APLT MOTION FOR LV TO FILE REPLY BRIEFand the Clerk shall file the lodged reply brief. (WH,RD,TH)
01/15/2008APPELLANT'S REPLY BRIEF
01/17/2008CERTIFICATE PER RULE 28
02/04/2008AFFIRMED MOJ (Washington, Reid, Thompson)
02/07/2008CJA ATTORNEY'S QUALLS LETTER
02/20/2008APPELLEE'S MISCELLANEOUS SUBSTANTIVE MOTION to publish.
02/27/2008MANDATE ISSUED
02/27/2008APPELLANT'S OPPOSITION - to aple's motion to publish
03/06/2008On consideration of appellee's motion to publish this court's memorandum opinion and judgment in the above matter filed February 4, 2008, and appellant's opposition thereto, it is ORDERED that the motion is denied. (WH,RD,TH)