| Case Information: 08-AA-0129 | |||
| Short Caption: | ARAMARK CORPORATION V. DC DEPT OF EMPLOYMENT SVCS. | Classification: | Agency - Administrative Agency - Worker's Compensation |
| Superior Court or Agency Case Number: | CRB7-08 | Filed Date: | 02/26/2008 |
| | |||
| Opening Event Date: | 02/26/2008 | Case Status: | Closed |
| Record Completed: | Post-Decision Matter Pending: | ||
| Briefs Completed: | |||
| Argued/Submitted: | |||
| Disposition: | Next Scheduled Action: | ||
| Mandate Issued: | 04/17/2008 | ||
| Party Information | |||||||||
| Appellate Role | Party Name | IFP | Attorney(s) | Arguing Attorney | E-Filer | ||||
| Intervenor-Respondent | Curtis Gibson | N |
| ||||||
| Petitioner | Aramark Corporation | N |
| ||||||
| Respondent | D.C. Department of Employment Services - Worker's Comp. | N |
| ||||||
| Events | ||||
| Event Date | Status | Description | Result | |
| 02/26/2008 | PETITION FOR REVIEW | |||
| 02/26/2008 | FILING FEE of $100.00. | |||
| 02/26/2008 | CERTIFIED COPY OF PETITION TO BOARD and Todd Kim, Esq. & Gregory Lamb, esq. | |||
| 02/28/2008 | ORDERED that petitioner shall within 20 days from the date of this order SHOW CAUSE why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction as having been taken from a NON-FINAL order. See Washington Hospital Center v. D.C. Dept. of Employment Serv., 712 A.2d 1018 (D.C. 1998). (BY: ETW) lw | |||
| 02/28/2008 | TMC - OTSC - ROTSC | |||
| 03/11/2008 | NOTICE OF INTENT TO INTERVENE- Curtis Gibson and Benjamin Boscolo will represent Mr. Gibson as counsel | |||
| 03/14/2008 | RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE | |||
| 03/19/2008 | On consideration of this court's February 28, 2008, order directing petitioner to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction...THE RESPONSE thereto, CONSTRUED AS A MOTION TO AMEND the petition for review, and it appearing tha the remand order that is subject of the petition for review has resulted in issuance of a separate order by the administrative law judge, but the time for appealing that order to the Compensation Review Board has not expired. It is ORDERED that the MOTION TO AMEND IS DENIED as the administrative law judge's order is not final because the appeal time has not expired. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the PETITION FOR REVIEW IS DISMISSED W/O PREJUDICE to petitioner filing a new petition once the appeal time has expired before the agency. (RDSTTE) | |||
| 03/19/2008 | DISMISSED | |||
| 04/03/2008 | RECEIVED- record on appeal | |||
| 04/17/2008 | MANDATE ISSUED | |||