Events |
Event Date | Status | Description | Result |
02/07/2008 | | NOTICE OF APPEAL | |
02/25/2008 | | APPELLANT'S MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS | |
02/25/2008 | | APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR STAY of eviction/ejection pursuant to contempt order and for entry of protective order (EMERGENCY) (missing supporting documents) | |
02/25/2008 | | APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR STAY of eviction/ejection pursuant to contempt order and for entry of protective order (AMENDED - includes supporting documents) | |
02/27/2008 | | APPELLEE'S OPPOSITION- aplt's amended emergency motion fo rstay of eviction pursuant to contempt order of 2/20/08 and for entry of protective order | |
02/27/2008 | | TMC - appellant's amended EMERGENCY motion for stay and motion for protective order - opposition - appellant's motion for leave to proceed IFP | |
02/28/2008 | | ORDERED that the MOTION for leave to proceed IFP IS DENIED. It is *****MORE***** | |
02/28/2008 | | FURTHER ORDERED that appellant's EMERGENCY MOTION and AMENDED EMERGENCY MOTION FOR STAY ARE DENIED. The appellant has not demonstrated a likelihood of success on the merits of her claim that the trial court erred in holding her in contempt and sentencing her to 40 days of incarceration for having failed to comply with its previous order direcing her to vacate the underlying property in which it held she has no equitable interest. Moreover, appellant has the ability to purge this sanction simply by complying with the court's order to vacate. In addition appellant has failed to indentify any irreparable harm to herself or to consider the harm her continued occupation of the subject premises will cause appellee. See Barry v. Washington Post Co., 529 A.2d 319, 321 (D.C. 1987). It is *****MORE***** | |
02/28/2008 | | F/ORDERED that appellant must, within 10 days from the date of this order, file with CRD, a request for preparation of transcripts of proceedings in the Superior Court. See D.C. App. R. 10(b)(1). It is F/ORDERED that appellant shall simultaneously submit a file stamped copy of that motion with this court. Failure to comply with this or any other order of this court will subject this appeal to dismissal w/o further notice... (GLFIST) | |
03/10/2008 | | STATEMENT REGARDING TRANSCRIPT(S) 8/21/06 - tape 5/1/07 - tape 9/17/07 - tape 2/20/08 - tape 12/13/06 - tape (rt. needed) | |
03/25/2008 | | Upon consideration of the notices of appeal filed in these matters, and it appearing that a statement regarding transcript has been filed, it is ORDERED, sua sponte, that appeals nos. 08-FM-126 and 08-FM-192 are consolidated for all purposes herein. It is FURTHER ORDERED that a consolidated briefing order will be issued upon the filing in this court by the Clerk of the Superior Court, the record index and transcripts required by D.C. App. R. 11(b)(3)(A). (GP) | |
07/21/2008 | | SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD - #1 (17 pgs/tape) 8/21/06 proc. | |
07/21/2008 | | SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD - #2 (98 pgs/tape) 12/13/06 proc. | |
07/21/2008 | | SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD - #3 (151 pgs/tape) 5/1/07 proc. | |
07/21/2008 | | SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD - #4 (193 pgs/tape) 9/17/07 proc. | |
07/21/2008 | | SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD - #5 (40 pgs/tape) 2/20/08 proc. | |
07/21/2008 | | RECORD COMPLETED | |
07/23/2008 | | It appearing that the complete record on appeal has been filed with this court, it is ORDERED that appellant's brief and the appendix including the documents required by D.C. App. R. 30 (a)(1), shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and appellee's brief shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 31. (GP) | |
08/29/2008 | | COUNSEL'S MOTION TO WITHDRAW FOR BUSINESS REASONS | Granted |
09/02/2008 | | APPELLANT'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF and appendix (pro se motion) 75 days | |
09/09/2008 | | APPELLEE'S OPPOSITION - to aplt's motion for extension of time to file brief | |
09/17/2008 | | APPELLANT'S REPLY- to aple's oppo to aplt's motion to request an extension of time to file brief and record appendix | |
09/24/2008 | | ORD GRT COUNSEL MO TO WITHDRAW FOR BUSINESS REASON and the appearance of Olekanma Ekekwe, Esquire, is hereby withdrawn as counsel of record and appellant shall proceed pro se. It is (MORE) | |
09/24/2008 | | ORD GRANT APLT MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF and appellant's brief shall be filed on or before November 17, 2008. (ETW) | |
09/24/2008 | | APPELLANT'S MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS | |
09/30/2008 | | APPELLEE'S OPPOSITION to aplt's mot to proceed in forma pauperis. | |
10/06/2008 | | APPELLANT'S REPLY - to aple's oppo to aplt's motion to proceed inform pauperis | |
10/07/2008 | | ORDERED that petitioner's motion is denied without prejudice to its renewal within 20 days from the date of this order by filing a supplemental affidavit identifying all assets, wherever held, in light of the trial court's findings regarding assets held outside the U.S. Failure to comply with this order shall result in the denial of appellant's motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. It is F/O that petitioner's motion for in forma pauperis is hereby held in abeyance pending further order of this court. (ETW) | |
10/14/2008 | | APPELLANT'S ANSWER/RESPONSE to this Court's order dated 10/7/08 | |
10/21/2008 | | TMC - motion for IFP (IN ABEYANCE) - opposition - reply - 10/7 - appellant's amended affidavit - opposition | |
10/23/2008 | | APPELLEE'S OPPOSITION - to Appellant's response to the court order of 10/7/08 | |
10/28/2008 | | APPELLANT'S REPLY to Opposition to file supplemental affidavit in support of motion for waiver of prepayment of court fees and costs | |
10/30/2008 | | ORDERED that appellant's MOTION TO PROCEED IFP IS DENIED. Further, any requests for the production of transcript w/o prepayment of costs must be filed with the trial judge. See D.C. App. R. 10(b)(5)(A) and Hancock v. Mutual of Omaha Ins. Co., 472 A.2d 867 (D.C. 1984). It is FURTHER ORDERED that appellant's brief and joint appendix remains due to be filed no later than November 17, 2008. The brief of appellee shall be filed 30 days thereafter. (BRFAPR) | |
11/17/2008 | | APPELLANT'S BRIEF | |
11/17/2008 | | APPENDIX- aplt | |
12/15/2008 | | APPELLEE'S BRIEF | |
12/15/2008 | | BRIEFS COMPLETED | |
12/15/2008 | | APPELLANT'S MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION for leave to supplement the appendix no oppo w/ documents to to supplement attached | |
12/19/2008 | | APLT MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE REPLY BRIEF to 30 days. | |
01/08/2009 | | ORDER GRANT APLT MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION to file a supplemental appendix and the lodged supplemental appendix is filed. It is (MORE) | |
01/08/2009 | | ORD GRANT APLT MO TO EXT TIME TO FILE REPLY BRIEF and the reply brief shall be filed on or before February 5, 2009. (GP) | |
01/08/2009 | | APPELLANT'S SUPPLEMENTAL APPENDIX | |
02/05/2009 | | RECORD INDEX (for both) | |
02/05/2009 | | APPELLANT'S REPLY BRIEF | |
04/27/2009 | | APPELLANT'S MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION for leave to amend the issues on appeal under case 08FM126 and 08FM192 | |
05/08/2009 | | APPELLEE'S OPPOSITION - to aplt's motion to amend issues on appeal under case 08FM126 and 08FM192 | |
05/13/2009 | | APPELLANT'S ANSWER/RESPONSE to aple's oppo to mot to stay or alternatively vacate order. | |
05/13/2009 | | FINAL SCREENING - SUMMARY CALENDAR I | |
05/14/2009 | | ORDER, SUA SPONTE, CONSOLIDATING APPEALS appeal no. 09-FM-465, is consolidated with previously consolidated appeal nos. 08-FM-126 & 09-FM-192. It is F/O that, in appeal no. 09-FM-465, a briefing order will be issued upon the filing in this court, by the Clerk of the Superior Court, of the record index/or record index & record copies in accordance with D.C. App. R. 11(b)(3)(A). (ETW) | |
05/14/2009 | | ORDERED that, in appeal nos. 08-FM-126 & 08-FM-192, appellant's motion to amend the issues on appeal is denied as appeals are limited to matters that were before the court on the date the order was issued and post order pleadings may not be considered. It is | |
05/28/2009 | | RECORD INDEX 09FM465 | |
06/10/2009 | | It appearing that the complete record on appeal has been filed with this court in appeal no. 09-FM-495, and that briefing has been completed in 08-FM-126 and 09-FM-192, it is ORDERED that appellant's brief and the appendix in appeal no. 09-FM-495, shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and that appellee's brief shall be filed filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 30, 31. (GP) | |
07/27/2009 | | On consideration of this court's order of June 10, 2009, directing appellant in appeal no. 09-FM-465, to file the brief and the appendix within 40 days from the date of the order, and it appearing that the brief has not been filed, it is ORDERED that the brief of appellant and the appendix shall be submitted within 20 days from the date of this order, accompanied by a motion for leave to file out of time. The motion should set forth good cause for the failure either to timely file the documents or to request an extension of time within which to do so. Failure to comply with this order shall subject appeal no. 09-FM-465 to dismissal without further notice. See. D.C. App. R. 13. (GP) | |
08/18/2009 | | APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE BRIEF (09-FM-465) | |
08/18/2009 | | RECEIVED - Appellant's Brief and Appendix (09-FM-465) | |
08/21/2009 | | On consideration of appellant's motion for leave to late file the lodged brief and appendix in appeal no. 09-FM-465, to which no opposition has been filed, it is ORDERED that appellant's motion is granted and the lodged brief and appendix is filed. It is FURTHER ORDERED that appellee's brief shall be filed within 30 days from the date of this order. (GP) | |
08/21/2009 | | APPELLANT'S BRIEF (09-FM-465) | |
08/21/2009 | | APPENDIX | |
09/11/2009 | | APPELLEE'S BRIEF | |
09/11/2009 | | BRIEFS COMPLETED | |
10/07/2009 | | LETTER FROM COUNSEL/PARTY RE FUTURE CALENDARING aplt | |
11/16/2009 | | FINAL SCREENING - SUMMARY CALENDAR I | |
02/03/2010 | | CALENDAR NOTICE SENT | |
03/03/2010 | Filed | ACTION - Argued / Submitted | |
03/03/2010 | | SUBMITTED to Judges Ferren, Steadman, King | |
05/13/2010 | Filed | AFFIRMED Opinion (Ferren, Steadman, King) and Judgment affirming the TC contempt order against aplt Bansda as well as the final divorce order declining separate maintenance for Bansda and dividing and distributing the real and personal property of the parties; and affirming the denial of aplt Ekekwe's motion for reconsideration of the court-ordered sanctions. | |
06/03/2010 | | MANDATE ISSUED | |