judyrecords
search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

District Of Columbia Court Of Appeals Record

PHILLIP SUGGS V. LAKRITZ ADLER MANAGEMENT, LLC

Case Information: 06-CV-0182
Short Caption:PHILLIP SUGGS V. LAKRITZ ADLER MANAGEMENT, LLCClassification:Appeals - Civil - Landlord And Tenant
Superior Court or Agency Case Number:LTB30891-05Filed Date:02/09/2006

Opening Event Date:02/09/2006Case Status:Closed
Record Completed:05/17/2006Post-Decision Matter Pending:
Briefs Completed:10/18/2006
Argued/Submitted:04/03/2007
Disposition:Next Scheduled Action:
Mandate Issued:09/07/2007
Costs Waived

Party Information
Appellate RoleParty NameIFPAttorney(s)Arguing AttorneyE-Filer
AppellantPhillip Suggs Y
B. Marian ChouYY
AppelleeLakritz Adler Management LLCN
Stephen O. HesslerYY

Events
Event DateStatusDescriptionResult
02/09/2006NOTICE OF APPEAL
03/08/2006 On consideration of the notice of appeal filed in this case on February 9, 2006, and it appearing that appellant was granted in forma pauperis status in the trial court, and it further appearing that transcript is required for this appeal, it is ORDERED that appellant shall within 20 days from the date of this order file with the Appeals Coordinator's Office a request for preparation of transcripts of proceedings in the Superior Court, on motion with notice, to the appropriate motions or trial judge, for determination in accordance with Hancock v. Mutual of Omaha Ins. Co., 472 A.2d 867 (D.C. 1984). See D.C. App. R. 10 (b)(5)(A). It is FURTHER ORDERED that appellant shall simultaneously submit a file stamped copy of that motion with this court, it is FURTHER ORDERED that appellant's failure to respond to any order of this court, including this order, shall subject this appeal to dismissal without further notice for lack of prosecution. See D.C. App. R. 13(a). (GP) elp
04/20/2006 On consideration of this court's order of March 8, 2006, directing appellant to submit the motion for appeal transcript within 20 days from the date of the order, and it appearing that appellant has failed to comply with the order, it is ORDERED that this appeal is hereby dismissed. See D.C. App. R. 13. (ETW) elp
04/20/2006DISMISSED
04/27/2006APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION - and vacate 4/20/06 order and reinstate case w/ motion for appeals transcript atttached
05/10/2006RECEIVED RECORD INDEX
05/10/2006RECEIVED SR#1 (97pgs.--Tape) (proc.1/17/06)
05/10/2006RECEIVED SR#2 (9pgs.--Tape) (proc.2/6/06)
05/17/2006 On considereation of appellant's motion to reconsider and vacate April 20 2006 order and reinstate case, to which no opposition has been filed, and the lodged record index and transcripts. it is ORDERED the motion is granted to the extent that the appeal is hereby reinstated. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall file the lodged record index and transcripts. It is FURTHER ORDERED that appellant's brief and the appendix including the documents, required by D.C. App. R. 30 (a)(1), shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and appellee's brief shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 31. (ETW) elp
05/17/2006RECORD INDEX
05/17/2006SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD #1 (97 pgs. --Tape) (proc. 1/17/06)
05/17/2006SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD #2 (9 pgs. - - Tape) (proc. 2/6/06)
05/17/2006RECORD COPIES
05/17/2006RECORD COMPLETED
06/23/2006APPELLANT'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF to July 25, 2006.
07/06/2006APPELLEE'S OPPOSITION - to aplt's motion for continue to file brief
07/11/2006 On consideration of appellant's motion for an extension of time within which to file the brief and the limited appendix, and the opposition thereto, it is ORDERED that the motion is granted and appellant's brief and the limited appendix shall be filed on or before July 25, 2006. (ETW) elp
07/24/2006APPELLANT'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF to 8/25/06
08/01/2006APPELLEE'S OPPOSITION to appellant's motion for an extension of time.
08/03/2006 On consideration of appellant's motion for an extension of time within which to file the brief and the limited appendix, and the opposition thereto, it is ORDERED that the motion is granted and appellant's brief and the limited appendix shall be filed on or before August 24, 2006. Any further requests for extensions of time will be looked upon with disfavor and granted only upon a showing of good cause. (MWF)
08/24/2006APPELLANT'S BRIEF
08/24/2006APPENDIX (Appellant's)
09/27/2006APPELLEE'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF for 20 days
10/13/2006 On consideration of appellee's motion for an extension of time within which to file the brief, to which no opposition has been filed, it is ORDERED that the motion is granted and appellee's brief shall be filed on or before October 18, 2006. (GP) elp
10/18/2006APPELLEE'S BRIEF
10/18/2006BRIEFS COMPLETED
11/15/2006FINAL SCREENING - SUMMARY CALENDAR I
02/02/2007CALENDAR NOTICE SENT
03/06/2007SUBMITTED to Judges Farrell, Ruiz, Steadman
03/20/2007ORDER - It is ORDERED, sua sponte, that this matter is scheduled for argument on April 3, 2007, at 2:00 p.m. The parties are to be present in the District of Columbia Court of Appeals courtroom, located on the sixth floor, at 1:55 p.m. on the date. At argument, counsel should be prepared to address, inter alia, the applicability of McNeal v. Habib, 346 A.2d 508 (D.C. 1973) and of 42 D.C. Code 3505.01(a) and (b) to the case at bar. (FA,RZ,ST)
04/02/2007APLT MOTION FOR LEAVE TO SUPPLEMENT THE RECORD no oppo w/ documents attached
04/03/2007FiledACTION - Argued / Submitted
04/03/2007ARGUED before Judges Farrell, Ruiz, Steadman B. Marian Chou, Esq. for appellant Stephen O. Hessler, Esq. for appellee
04/09/2007On consideration of the consent motion of appellant to supplement the record on appeal, it is ORDERED that the motion of appellant to supplement the record is granted and the Clerk shall file the referenced items as part of the record on appeal. (FA,RZ,ST)
04/09/2007SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD #3 - 809-811 OTIS PLACE TENANT SURVEY
08/16/2007REVERSED AND REMANDED Opinion (Farrell, Ruiz, Steadman) and Judgment reversing the trial court's judgment and remanding the case for further proceedings consistent with said opinion.
09/07/2007MANDATE ISSUED