| Case Information: 06-AA-0189 | |||
| Short Caption: | WANNEH D. CLARKE V. RANDSTAD USLP | Classification: | Agency - Administrative Agency - Employment Services |
| Superior Court or Agency Case Number: | ESP102698-05 | Filed Date: | 03/03/2006 |
| | |||
| Opening Event Date: | 03/03/2006 | Case Status: | Closed |
| Record Completed: | 09/27/2007 | Post-Decision Matter Pending: | |
| Briefs Completed: | 04/01/2008 | ||
| Argued/Submitted: | 10/02/2008 | ||
| Disposition: | Next Scheduled Action: | ||
| Mandate Issued: | 10/27/2008 | ||
| Costs Waived | |||
| Party Information | |||||||||
| Appellate Role | Party Name | IFP | Attorney(s) | Arguing Attorney | E-Filer | ||||
| Petitioner | Wanneh D. Clarke | Y |
| ||||||
| Respondent | Randstad Uslp | N | |||||||
| Events | ||||
| Event Date | Status | Description | Result | |
| 03/03/2006 | PETITION FOR REVIEW (NUNC PRO TUNC) | |||
| 03/03/2006 | PETITIONER'S MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS | |||
| 03/14/2006 | ORDER GRANT PTNR MO TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, and the Clerk shall file the lodged petition for review nunc pro tunc to March 3, 2006. It is F/ORDERED that the Office of Administrative Hearings shall file the administrative record w/in 60 days from the date of this order. See D.C. App. R. 17. If a hearing was held, the record should include either a certified copy of the transcript of any testimony before the agency or a certified narrative statement of relevant proceedings and evidence in accordance with D.C. App. R. 16 (a)(4). It is F/ORDERED that Randstad USLP shall w/in 15 days from the date of this order advise this court as to the identity of its counsel. See Moore Energy Resources, Inc. v. Public Sev. Comm'n of the District of Columbia, 785 A.2d 300, 304 (D.C. 2001); D.C. App. R. 15 (a)(5). (ETW) | |||
| 03/14/2006 | CERTIFIED COPY OF PETITION TO BOARD and Edward E. Schwab, Esquire. | |||
| 07/21/2006 | On consideration of the court's order of March 14, 2006, directing respondent to identify its counsel within 15 days from the date of the order, and it appearing that respondent has filed to comply with the order, it is ORDERED that respondent shall within 10 calendar days from the date of this order advise this court as to the identity of its counsel. See Moore Energy Resources, Inc. v. Public Serv. Comm'n of the DC, 785 A.2d 300, 304 (DC 2001); DC App. R. 159a)(5). Failure to comply with this order shall result in respondent being prohibited from filing its brief. (ETW) | |||
| 09/27/2007 | RECORD ON APPEAL w/transcripts attached | |||
| 09/27/2007 | RECORD COMPLETED | |||
| 10/04/2007 | It appearing that the complete record on appeal has been filed with this court, it is ORDERED that petitioner's brief and the limited appendix, as required by D.C. App. R. 30(f), shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and respondent's brief shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 30, 31. (GP) | |||
| 11/07/2007 | PETITIONER'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF | |||
| 11/26/2007 | On consideration of petitioner's motion for an extension of time within which to file the brief, to which no opposition has been filed, it is ORDERED that the motion is granted and petitioner's brief and the limited appendix shall be filed on or before December 13, 2007. (GP) | |||
| 12/12/2007 | PETITIONER'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF to 2/13/08 | |||
| 12/28/2007 | On consideration of petitioner's motion for an extension of time within which to file the brief, to which no opposition has been filed, it is ORDERED that the motion is granted and petitioner's brief and the limited appendix shall be filed on or before February 13, 2008. Any further requests for extensions of time will be looked upon with disfavor and granted only upon a showing of good cause. (GP) | |||
| 02/13/2008 | PETITIONER'S BRIEF | |||
| 02/13/2008 | APPENDIX | |||
| 04/01/2008 | On consideration of this court's order of July 21, 2006, which directed respondent to identify its counsel, and it appearing that respondent has failed to comply with the order, and it further appearing that respondent's brief was due to be filed on or before March 20, 2008, but the brief has not been filed with this court, it is ORDERED that this petition for review shall be scheduled for consideration before a merits division of this court on the record and on petitioner's brief alone. (MWF) | |||
| 04/01/2008 | BRIEFS COMPLETED | |||
| 05/07/2008 | FINAL SCREENING - SUMMARY CALENDAR I | |||
| 08/29/2008 | CALENDAR NOTICE SENT | |||
| 09/08/2008 | PETITIONER'S MOTION REQUESTING ORAL ARGUMENT | |||
| 09/11/2008 | LETTER TO COUNSEL GRANTING REQUEST TO ARGUE (GP) | |||
| 10/02/2008 | Filed | ACTION - Argued / Submitted | ||
| 10/02/2008 | ARGUED before Newman, Schwelb, King Johnnie D. Bond, Jr., Esq. for Petitioner | |||
| 10/02/2008 | AFFIRMED MOJ (Newman, Schwelb, King) | |||
| 10/27/2008 | MANDATE ISSUED | |||