judyrecords
search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

District Of Columbia Court Of Appeals Record

KEITH J. BELL V. DC DEPT OF EMPLOYMENT SVCS.

Case Information: 08-AA-0320
Short Caption:KEITH J. BELL V. DC DEPT OF EMPLOYMENT SVCS.Classification:Agency - Administrative Agency - Worker's Compensation
Superior Court or Agency Case Number:CRB357-98Filed Date:04/02/2008

Opening Event Date:04/02/2008Case Status:Closed
Record Completed:Post-Decision Matter Pending:
Briefs Completed:
Argued/Submitted:
Disposition:Next Scheduled Action:
Mandate Issued:07/10/2008
Costs Waived

Party Information
Appellate RoleParty NameIFPAttorney(s)Arguing AttorneyE-Filer
PetitionerKeith Bell YPro SeN
RespondentD.C. Department of Employment Services - Worker's Comp.N
Pastell Vann NN
Todd S. KimNY

Events
Event DateStatusDescriptionResult
04/02/2008PETITION FOR REVIEW-NUNC PRO TUNC PER 4/9/08 ORDER
04/02/2008PETITIONER'S MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
04/09/2008 ORDERED that the MOTION IS GRANTED and petitioner shall proceed on appeal IFP. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk SHALL FILE the lodged PETITION FOR REVIEW NUNC PRO TUNC to April 2, 2008. It is *****MORE*****
04/09/2008 FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner shall within 20 days from the date of this order SHOW CAUSE why this petition should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See D.C. Code 32-1522 (2007 supp.). (BY: ETW)
04/09/2008TMC - OTSC - ROTSC (PETITIONER) - ROTSC (RESPONDENT)
04/29/2008RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE (PETITIONERS)
05/07/2008 ORDERED that RESPONDENT SHALL within 20 days from the date of this order, FILE A RESPONSE addressing petitioner's filing on whether this matter can be reviewed or whether this court lacks jurisdiction since the order was not first appealed to the Compensation Review Board. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the PFR is hereby HELD IN ABEYANCE pending respondent's response to this order. (BY: ETW) lw
05/27/2008RESPONDENT'S MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION for extension of time to respond to the order of May 7, 2008.
05/29/2008 On consideration of respondent's motion for an extension of time to file a response to this court's order to show cause and to petitioner's response thereto, it is ORDERED that respondent's motion is granted and its response shall be filed no later than June 9, 2008. (BY: GP) lw
06/09/2008RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE- (RESPONDENT)
06/17/2008 ORDERED that the PFR is HEREBY DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction because petitioner has failed to exhaust his administrative remedies. (GLTESC)
06/17/2008DISMISSED
07/10/2008MANDATE ISSUED
08/05/2008PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
08/18/2008LETTER to petitioner in response to his 8/5/08 motion for reconsideration. (GP)