Events |
Event Date | Status | Description | Result |
11/30/2005 | | NOTICE OF APPEAL | |
01/09/2006 | | On consideration of the notice of appeal filed in this case on November 30, 2005, and it appearing that the trial court issued multiple orders on November 20, 2005, and it is unclear as to which order appellant seeks to appeal, it is ORDERED that appellant shall within 10 days from the date of this order file an amended notice of appeal which addresses with specificity, the order appellant seeks to appeal. It is *****MORE***** | |
01/09/2006 | | FURTHER ORDERED that appellant shall, within 10 days from the date of this order, complete and file with this court a single copy of the attached statement regarding transcript. Where transcript(s) necessary for this appeal have been ordered and completed for non-appeal purposes, appellant must advise the Court Reporting Division to forward said transcript(s) for inclusion in the record on appeal. If partial transcripts are being ordered, appellant must file a statement of issues to be raised on appeal with this court within 10 days from the date of this order. See D.C. App. R. 10 (b)(3)(A). It is FURTHER ORDERED appellant's failure to respond to any order of this court, including this order, shall subject this appeal to dismissal without further notice for lack of prosecution. See D.C. App. R. 13(a). (BY: ETW) lw | |
01/19/2006 | | STATEMENT REGARDING TRANSCRIPT(S) (RT-ORDERED for 11/10/05****COMPLETED) | |
01/25/2006 | | On consideration of this court's January 9, 2006, order directing appellant to file an amended notice of appeal, within 10 days from the date of the order, which addresses with specificity, the order appellant seeks to appeal, and it appearing that an amended notice of appeal has not been filed, it is ORDERED that appellant shall within 10 days from the date of this order file an amended notice of appeal which addresses with specificity, the order appellant seeks to appeal. It is FURTHER ORDERED that appellant shall simultaneously submit a file-stamped copy of the amended notice of appeal to this court. Failure to comply with this order shall subject this appeal to dismissal without further notice. See D.C. App. R. 13. (BY: GP) | |
01/25/2006 | | RECEIVED - AMENDED NOTICE OF APPEAL as per 1/9/06 ORDER LW | |
02/02/2006 | | ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE that appellant shall within 20 days from the date of this order SHOW CAUSE why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction as having been prematurely filed as no separtate judgment has been entered per Super. Ct. Civ. R. 58. See Carter v. Cathedral Ave., Coop., Inc., 532 A.2d 681 (D.C. 1987). (BY: ETW) lw | |
02/02/2006 | | TMC - OTSC - response | |
02/09/2006 | | RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - order of 2/2/06 why case should not be dismissed | |
03/14/2006 | | On consideration of this court's February 2, 2006, order, directing appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction as having been prematurely filed as no separtate judgment had been entered pursuant to Super. Ct. Civ. R. 58, and the response thereto, it appearing that the trial court entered judgment on March 13, 2006, causing this appeal to ripen, it is ORDERED that the ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE is HEREBY DISCHARGED. (SCGLPR) | |
04/07/2006 | | RECORD INDEX | |
04/07/2006 | | SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD #1 (54-pgs/jackson 11/10/05 proc.) | |
04/07/2006 | | RECORD COMPLETED | |
04/12/2006 | | It appearing that the complete record on appeal has been filed with this court, it is ORDERED that appellant's brief and the appendix including the documents required by D.C. App. R. 30 (a)(1), shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and appellee's brief shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 31. (BY: GP) | |
05/17/2006 | | APPELLANT'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF no oppo 30 days | |
05/18/2006 | | On consideration of appellant's consent motion for an enlargement of time to file appellant's brief, it is ORDERED that the motion is granted and appellant's brief and the appendix shall be filed on or before June 19, 2006. (GP) elp | |
06/19/2006 | | APPELLANT'S BRIEF | |
06/19/2006 | | APPENDIX - aplt | |
07/26/2006 | | APPELLEE'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF to 30 days. no oppo | |
07/31/2006 | | On consideration of appellee's unopposed motion for an extension of time within which to file the brief, it is ORDERED that the motion is granted and appellee's brief shall be filed on or before August 23, 2006. (GP) elp | |
08/23/2006 | | APPELLEE'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF no oppo 3wks | |
08/24/2006 | | On consideration of appellee's unopposed motion for an extension of time within which to file the brief, it is ORDERED that the motion is granted and appellee's brief shall be filed on or before September 13, 2006. Any further requests for extensions of time will be looked upon with disfavor and granted only upon a showing of good cause. (GP) elp | |
09/13/2006 | | APPELLEE'S BRIEF | |
09/13/2006 | | BRIEFS COMPLETED | |
11/16/2006 | | FINAL SCREENING - REGULAR CALENDAR | |
11/21/2006 | | It appearing that this appeal is likely to be calendared for argument during the months of February 2007 through March 2007, it is ORDERED that counsel shall advise this court in writing by December 11, 2006, of specific dates during that period when they are unavailable so that the court can attempt to avoid such dates in scheduling argument. Counsel must continue to advise the court of availabilities for subsequent months until this case is in fact set for argument. Note that the calendar is prepared approximately two months in advance, e.g. January calendar set for release at the end of November. The court does not encourage the filing of motions to postpone a scheduled argument. If you do seek a change in a scheduled argument date, your motion should both indicate the opponent's position with respect to your request and alternative dates when you and opposing counsel would be available. You may call the Calendar Clerk prior to filing such a motion for information on dates in the scheduled month when the courtroom is available.(aj) Garland Pinkston, Jr. Clerk | |
11/27/2006 | | LETTER FROM COUNSEL/PARTY RE FUTURE CALENDARING | |
12/11/2006 | | LETTER FROM COUNSEL/PARTY RE FUTURE CALENDARING aplt | |
02/02/2007 | | CALENDAR NOTICE SENT | |
03/15/2007 | Filed | ACTION - Argued / Submitted | |
03/15/2007 | | ARGUED before Judges Kramer, Thompson, Steadman Deidra L. Davis McEachern, Esq. for appellant Mary L. Wilson, Esq. for appellee | |
03/16/2007 | | CERTIFICATE PER RULE 28 | |
03/29/2007 | | CERTIFICATE PER RULE 28 | |
03/04/2009 | | LETTER - from aplt's counsel regarding the delay in decision on the case | |
03/16/2009 | | LETTER to counsel for appellant in response to her letter of March 4. (JAC) | |
06/18/2009 | | AFFIRMED IN PART/REVERSED IN PART Opinion (Kramer, Thompson, Steadman) and Judgment affirming in part and reversing in part the trial court's grant of summary judgment and remanding the case for further proceedings consistent with said opinion. | |
07/02/2009 | | APLE MO TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE PET FOR REH/REH EB to July 23, 2009. | |
07/10/2009 | | ORD GRT APLE MO TO EXT TM TO FL PET FOR REH/REH EB on or before July 23, 2009. (WH) | |
07/30/2009 | | MANDATE ISSUED | |