Case Information: 05-AA-1412 | |||
Short Caption: | GLORIA MORAN V. CHIMES DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA | Classification: | Agency - Administrative Agency - Employment Services |
Superior Court or Agency Case Number: | ESP102467-05 | Filed Date: | 12/07/2005 |
| |||
Opening Event Date: | 12/07/2005 | Case Status: | Closed |
Record Completed: | 12/12/2006 | Post-Decision Matter Pending: | |
Briefs Completed: | |||
Argued/Submitted: | |||
Disposition: | Next Scheduled Action: | ||
Mandate Issued: | 03/26/2007 | ||
Costs Waived |
Party Information | |||||||||
Appellate Role | Party Name | IFP | Attorney(s) | Arguing Attorney | E-Filer | ||||
Petitioner | Gloria Moran | Y | Pro Se | N | |||||
Respondent | Chimes District of Columbia | N |
|
Events | ||||
Event Date | Status | Description | Result | |
12/07/2005 | PETITION FOR REVIEW (nunc pro tunc) | |||
12/07/2005 | PETITIONER'S MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS | |||
12/14/2005 | ORDER GRANT PTNR MO TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, and the Clerk shall file the lodged petition for review nunc pro tunc to December 7, 2005. It is F/O that the Office of Administrative Hearing shall file the administrative record w/in 60 days from the date of this order. See D.C. App. R. 17. If a hearing was held, the record should include either a certified copy of the transcript of any testimony before the agency or a certified narrative statement of relevant proceedings and evidence in accordance with D.C. App. R. 16 (a)(4). It is F/O that respondent shall w/in 15 days from the date of this order advise this court as to the identity of its counsel. See Moore Energy Resources, Inc. v. Public Serv. Comm'n of the District of Columbia, 785 A.2d 300, 304 (D.C. 2001); D.C. App. R. 15 (a)(5). (ETW) | |||
12/14/2005 | CERTIFIED COPY OF PETITION TO BOARD and Milwee. | |||
12/27/2005 | APPEARANCE - of Laura L. Hoppenstein on behalf of respondent | |||
01/30/2006 | MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE (Howard K. Kurman) w/ receipt attached | Granted | ||
02/02/2006 | On consideration of the motion of Laura L. Hoppenstein, Esquire, requesting that the appearance of Howard K. Kurman, Esquire, be entered pro hac vice on behalf of Chimes District of Columbia, it is ORDERED that the motion of Laura L. Hoppenstein, Esquire is granted and the Clerk shall enter the appearance of Howard K. Kurman, Esquire, pro hac vice on behalf of Chimes Districtof Columbia. (ETW) elp | |||
11/13/2006 | SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD#1 (11/1/05 of OAH hearing) | |||
12/12/2006 | RECORD ON APPEAL | |||
12/12/2006 | RECORD COMPLETED | |||
12/14/2006 | It appearing that the complete record on appeal has been filed with this court, it is ORDERED that petitioner's brief and the limited appendix, as required by D.C. App. R. 30(f), shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and respondent's brief shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 30, 31. (GP) | |||
01/30/2007 | On consideration of this court's order of December 14, 2006, directing petitioner to file the brief, and the limited appendix, as required by D.C.App. R. 30 (f), within 40 days from the date of the order, and it appearing that the brief and the appendix have not been filed, it is ORDERED that the brief of petitioner and the limited appendix shall be submitted within 20 days from the date of this order, accompanied by a motion for leave to file the documents out of time. The motion should set forth good cause for the failure either to timely file the documents or to request an extension of time within which to do so. Failure to comply with this order shall subject this petition for review to dismissal without further notice. See D.C. App. R. 13. (GP) | |||
02/05/2007 | RESPONDENT'S MOTION TO DISMISS/WITHDRAW APPEAL | |||
03/02/2007 | On consideration of this court's order of January 30, 2007, directing petitioner to submit the brief, accompanied by a motion for leave to file out of time, and it appearin gthat petitioenr has failed to comply with the order, and respondent's motion to dismiss this petition for review, to which no opposition has been filed, it is ORDERED that respondent's motion is granted and this petition for review is hereby dismissed. See D.C. App. R. 13. (ETW) | |||
03/02/2007 | DISMISSED | |||
03/26/2007 | MANDATE ISSUED |