judyrecords
search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

District Of Columbia Court Of Appeals Record

KEITH A. CAMPBELL V. D.C. DEP'T OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL.

Case Information: 05-SP-1373
Short Caption:KEITH A. CAMPBELL V. D.C. DEP'T OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL.Classification:Appeals - Special Proceedings - Denial - Writ Of Habeas Corpus
Superior Court or Agency Case Number:CSP1932-05Filed Date:11/17/2005

Opening Event Date:11/17/2005Case Status:Closed
Record Completed:12/21/2005Post-Decision Matter Pending:
Briefs Completed:
Argued/Submitted:
Disposition:Next Scheduled Action:
Mandate Issued:08/22/2006
Costs Waived

Party Information
Appellate RoleParty NameIFPAttorney(s)Arguing AttorneyE-Filer
AppellantKeith A. Campbell YPro SeN
AppelleeD.C. Department of CorrectionsN
Edward E. SchwabNY
Mary L. WilsonNY
AppelleeUnited StatesN
Roy W. McLeese, IIINN
Nicholas P. ColemanYY

Events
Event DateStatusDescriptionResult
11/17/2005NOTICE OF APPEAL
12/05/2005 On consideration of the notice of appeal filed in this case on November 17, 2005, and it appearing that appellant was found eligible for cost-waived status in the trial court, and it further appearing that no transcript is needed for this appeal, it is ORDERED that a briefing order will be issued upon the filing in this court, by the Clerk of the Superior Court, the record index and record copies required by D.C. App. R. 11 (b)(3)(A). (By: GP)
12/21/2005RECORD INDEX
12/21/2005RECORD COPIES
12/21/2005RECORD COMPLETED
12/29/2005 It appearing that the complete record on appeal has been filed with this court, it is ORDERED that appellant's brief and the limited appendix including the documents required by D.C. App. R. 30 (f), shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and appellee's brief shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 31. (By: GP)
02/17/2006APPELLANT'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF for an additional 40 days. (Served by: DCCA on 2/17/06)
03/14/2006 On consideration of appellant's motion for an extension of time within which to file the brief, to which no opposition has been filed, it is ORDERED that the motion is granted, and appellant's brief and the limited appendix shall be filed on or before March 20, 2006. (By: GP)
03/22/2006APPELLANT'S BRIEF
03/22/2006APPENDIX attached to appellant's brief.
04/26/2006APLE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO SUPPLEMENT THE RECORD w/attachments (USAO)
04/26/2006APPELLEE'S BRIEF (USAO)
05/18/2006ORD GRANT APLE United States motion to supplement the record and the Clerk shall forward the lodged documents to the Appeals Coordinator's oFfice for transmittal to this corut as a supplemental record. It is FURTHER ORDERED that appellee the District of Columbia shall file a brief or a statement that the party will not be filing a brief within 20 days from the date of this order, accompanied by a motion for leave to file out of time. The motion should set forth good cause for the failure either to timely file the brief or ot request an extension of time within which to do so. Failure to comply with this order shall subject this appeal to being scheduled for consideration on the record and on the appellate briefs on file without further notice. (By: ETW)
05/25/2006SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD - #1 (docket entries)
06/07/2006APPELLEE'S MOTION TO HOLD CASE IN ABEYANCE (DC)dfe
07/12/2006ORDER GRANTING APPELLEE District of Columbia motion to stay and this appeal is hereby stayed pending further order of this court. It is FURTHER ORDERED that appellee District of Columbia shall within 30 days from the date of this order advise this court as to the status of the Superior court case and every 90 days thereafter. (By: MWF)
07/21/2006ORDERED: That the stay entered by this court on July 12, 2006, is hereby vacated. it is FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed as moot in light of Judge Stephen F. Eilperin's July 12, 2006 order, within 30 days from the date of this order. (By: ETW)
07/21/2006PROCEED WITH APPEAL, NO LONGER ON HOLD/STAYED
07/26/2006RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE (aple)
07/31/2006 On consideration of this court's July 21, 2006, order directing the parties to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed as moot in light of Judge Stephen F. Eilperin's July 12, 2006, order, and the response thereto, it is ORDERED that this APPEAL IS HEREBY DISMISSED AS MOOT. See Vaughn v. U.S., 579 A.2d 170, 175 (D.C. 1990). (BY: ETW) lw
07/31/2006DISMISSED
08/22/2006MANDATE ISSUED