judyrecords
search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

District Of Columbia Court Of Appeals Record

EMBASSY OF PAKISTAN, IIS V. LENKIN COMPANY MANAGEMENT, INC.

Case Information: 08-CV-1541
Short Caption:EMBASSY OF PAKISTAN, IIS V. LENKIN COMPANY MANAGEMENT, INC.Classification:Appeals - Civil - Landlord And Tenant
Superior Court or Agency Case Number:LTB22844-07Filed Date:11/25/2008

Opening Event Date:11/25/2008Case Status:Closed
Record Completed:02/02/2009Post-Decision Matter Pending:
Briefs Completed:04/20/2009
Argued/Submitted:12/04/2009
Disposition:Next Scheduled Action:
Mandate Issued:06/25/2010

Party Information
Appellate RoleParty NameIFPAttorney(s)Arguing AttorneyE-Filer
AppellantEmbassy of Pakistan IisN
Saeid B. AminiYY
AppelleeLenkin Company Management Inc.N
Jack C. Sando YN

Events
Event DateStatusDescriptionResult
11/25/2008NOTICE OF APPEAL
12/10/2008 On consideration of the notice of appeal filed in this case on November 25, 2008, it is ORDERED that appellant shall, within 20 days from the date of this order, complete and file with this court a single copy of the statement regarding transcript available for completion online. Where transcript(s) necessary for this appeal have been ordered for non-appeal purposes, appellant must advise the Court Reporting Division to forward said transcript(s) for inclusion in the record on appeal. If partial transcripts are being ordered, appellant must file a statement of issues to be raised on appeal with this court within 10 days from the date of this order. See D.C. App. R. 10 (b)(3)(A). It is FURTHER ORDERED appellant's failure to respond to any order of this court, including this order, shall subject this appeal to dismissal without further notice for lack of prosecution. See D.C. App. R. 13(a). (GP) elp
12/29/2008STATEMENT REGARDING TRANSCRIPT(S) (RT-NEEDED/RT-ORDERED for 6/30/08) (elp)
02/02/2009SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD #1 (90-pgs/coney 6/30/08 proc.)
02/02/2009RECORD COMPLETED
02/12/2009 It appearing that the complete record on appeal has been filed with this court, it is ORDERED that appellant's brief and the appendix including the documents required by D.C. App. R. 30 (a)(1), shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and appellee's brief shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 31. (GP) elp
02/13/2009RECORD INDEX
03/20/2009APPELLANT'S MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION for ext of time to file joint appendix. no oppo
03/20/2009APPELLANT'S BRIEF
03/23/2009 On consideration of appellant's motion for an extension of time to file the joint appendix, it is ORDERED that the motion is granted and the joint appendix shall be filed with this court on or before April 20. 2009. (GP) elp
03/24/2009RECEIVED - aple's response to aplt's motion for ext of time to file joint appendix.
04/06/2009APPENDIX (joint)
04/13/2009SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD #2 (29-pgs/tape 6/30/08 proc.)
04/20/2009APPELLEE'S BRIEF
04/20/2009BRIEFS COMPLETED
04/24/2009APLT MOTION FOR LV TO FILE AMENDED/CORRECTED BRIEF no oppo
04/24/2009RECEIVED - aplt's corrected brief.
04/28/2009 On consideration of appellant's motion for leave to file the lodged amended brief, to which no opposition has been filed, it is ORDERED that the motion is granted and appellant's lodged amended brief is filed. (GP) elp
04/28/2009APPELLANT'S AMENDED/CORRECTED BRIEF
05/15/2009FINAL SCREENING - SUMMARY CALENDAR I
09/30/2009CALENDAR NOTICE SENT
10/08/2009LETTER FROM COUNSEL/PARTY RE FUTURE CALENDARING aple
10/16/2009APPELLANT'S MOTION REQUESTING ORAL ARGUMENT
11/05/2009On consideration of appellant's motion for oral argument and appellee's letter in anticipation of a request for argument, and it appearing that this matter is scheduled on the summary calendar of November 23, 2009, it is ORDERED on behalf of the merits division assigned to consider this matter that the request for argument is granted and this matter is removed from the summary calendar of November 23, 2009, and rescheduled for December 4, 2009, at 2:00 p.m. The parties are to be present in the main courtroom of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals courtroom on the second floor of the Historic Courthouse at 1:50 p.m. on that date. At argumetn the parties should be prepared to address the following question: What is the effect of the failure of the tenant to exercise the measurement option under the 1983 lease on the (1) breach of contract claim, (2) unjust enrichment claim, (3) fraud and intentional misrepresentation claim, and (4) negligent misrepresentation claim, in light of the current lease binding the parties ( a 2005 lease extension to the 1988 lease agreement)? At argument each side shall have 15 minutes. (GP)
12/04/2009FiledACTION - Argued / Submitted
12/04/2009ARGUED before Judges Ruiz, Nebeker, Schwelb Saeid B. Amini, Esq. for appellant Jack C. Sando, Esq. for appellee
06/03/2010FiledREVERSED AND REMANDED Opinion (Ruiz, Nebeker, Schwelb) and Judgment reversing the trial court's grant of summary judgment and remanding the case for further proceedings.
06/25/2010MANDATE ISSUED