judyrecords
search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

District Of Columbia Court Of Appeals Record

TRACY L. ROGERS V. IMPERIAL VALET SERVICES, INC.

Case Information: 08-AA-1515
Short Caption:TRACY L. ROGERS V. IMPERIAL VALET SERVICES, INC.Classification:Agency - Administrative Agency - Employment Services
Superior Court or Agency Case Number:ESP111620-08Filed Date:12/02/2008

Opening Event Date:12/02/2008Case Status:Closed
Record Completed:05/05/2009Post-Decision Matter Pending:
Briefs Completed:09/24/2009
Argued/Submitted:
Disposition:Next Scheduled Action:
Mandate Issued:11/25/2009
Costs Waived

Party Information
Appellate RoleParty NameIFPAttorney(s)Arguing AttorneyE-Filer
PetitionerTracy L. Rogers YPro SeN
RespondentImperial Valet Services Inc.N
Eric SaylesNY

Events
Event DateStatusDescriptionResult
12/02/2008PETITION FOR REVIEW (nunc pro tunc)
12/02/2008PETITIONER'S MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
12/12/2008ORDER GRANT PTNR MO TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, and the Clerk shall file the lodged petition for review nunc pro tunc to December 2, 2008. F/ORDERED that Office of Administrative Hearings shall file the record within 60 days from the date of this order. See D.C. App. R. 17. If a hearing was held, the record should include either a certified copy of the transcript of any testimony before the agency or a certified narrative statement of relevant proceedings and evidence in accordance with D.C. App. R. 16 (a)(4). FURTHER ORDERED that respodent shall within 30 days from the date of this order advise this court as to the identity of its counsel. See Moore Energy Resources, Inc. v. Public Serv. Comm'n of the District of Columbia, 785 A.2d 300, 304 (D.C. 2001); D.C. App. R. 15 (a)(5). (ETW)
12/12/2008CERTIFIED COPY OF PETITION TO OAH & MILWEE
01/15/2009 On consideration of this court's order of Decembe 12, 2008, directing respondent to identify its counsel within 30 days from the date of the order, and it appearing that respondent has failed to comply with the order, it is ORDERED that respondent shall within 15 days from the date of this order advise this court as to the identity of its counsel. See Moore Energy Resources, Inc. v. Public Serv. Comm'n of the District of Columbia, 785 A.2d 300, 304 (D.C. 2001); D.C. App. R. 15 (a)(5). Failure to comply with this order shall result in respondent being prohibited from filing its brief. (GP)
01/26/2009RESPONDENT'S ANSWER/RESPONSE (identifying counsel)
05/05/2009RECORD ON APPEAL w/transcripts & exhibits
05/05/2009error
05/05/2009RECORD COMPLETED
05/07/2009 It appearing that the complete record on appeal has been filed with this court, it is ORDERED that petitioner's brief and the limited appendix, including documents required by D.C. App. R. 30 (f), shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and respondent's brief shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 30, 31. (GP)
06/18/2009 On consideration of this court's order of May 7, 2009, directing petitioner to file the brief, and the limited appendix, as required by D.C.App. R. 30 (f), within 40 days from the date of the order, and it appearing that the brief and the appendix have not been filed, it is ORDERED that the brief of petitioner and the limited appendix shall be submitted within 20 days from the date of this order, accompanied by a motion for leave to file the documents out of time. The motion should set forth good cause for the failure either to timely file the documents or to request an extension of time within which to do so. Failure to comply with this order shall subject this petition for review to dismissal without further notice. See D.C. App. R. 13. (GP)
06/30/2009PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE BRIEF
06/30/2009RECEIVED- petitioner's brief
07/02/2009APPENDIX
07/16/2009 On consideration of petitioner's motion for for leave to file the lodged brief, to which no opposition has been filed, it is ORDERED that petitioner'smotion is granted and the lodged brief and limited appendix are filed. It is FURTHER ORDERED that respondent's brief shall be filed withn 30 days from the date of this order. (GP)
07/16/2009PETITIONER'S BRIEF
07/16/2009APPENDIX
08/25/2009 It appearing that the brief of petitioner was filed with this court on July 16, 2009, and the brief of respondent was due to be filed on or before August 17, 2009, but the brief has not yet been filed with this court, it is ORDERED that respondent shall within 20 days from the date of this order submit the brief, accompanied by a motion for leave to file out of time. The motion should set forth good cause for the failure either to timely file the brief, or to request an extension of within which which to do so. Failure to comply with this order shall subject this appeal to being scheduledfor consideration on the record and on petitioner's brief alone. (GP)
09/23/2009CHANGE OF ADDRESS RECEIVED Eric H. Sayles
09/24/2009 On consideration of this court's order of August 25, 2009, which directed respondent to submit its brief within 20 days, accompanied by a motion for leave to file out of time, and it appearing that respondent has failed to comply with the order, it is ORDERED that this petition for review shall be scheduled for consideration on the record and on the petitioner's brief alone. (ETW)
09/24/2009BRIEFS COMPLETED
09/30/2009RESPONDENT'S MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION for leave to late file motion to dismiss appeal
09/30/2009RECEIVED- repsondent's motion to dismiss appeal
10/15/2009TMC - respondent's motion for leave to file (LODGED) motion to dismiss - petitioner's brief
10/23/2009LETTER, from Petitioner, informing the court that the Respondent is not serving her with pleadings presented to this court.
10/26/2009 ORDERED that the MOTION TO LATE FILE IS GRANTED and the Clerk SHALL FILE the MOTION TO DISMISS. It is *****MORE*****
10/26/2009RESPONDENT'S MOTION TO DISMISS/WITHDRAW APPEAL
10/26/2009 FURTHER ORDERED that the ORDER BELOW IS, SS, AFFIRMED. See 7 DCMR 311.7 (e)(2009) (illness or injury caused or aggravated by work considered good cause for voluntarily leaving work provided that claimant previously supplied employer with a medical statement);... It is *****MORE*****
10/26/2009 FURTHER ORDERED that the MOTION TO DISMISS is DENIED AS MOOT. It is *****MORE*******
10/26/2009 FURTHER ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the order on appeal is HEREBY AFFIRMED. (GLTHNB) (kt)
11/25/2009MANDATE ISSUED
05/05/2014FiledArchived