judyrecords
search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

District Of Columbia Court Of Appeals Record

ROBERT D. BYNUM V. ZOHERY TOURS, INC.

Case Information: 08-AA-0100
Short Caption:ROBERT D. BYNUM V. ZOHERY TOURS, INC.Classification:Agency - Administrative Agency - Employment Services
Superior Court or Agency Case Number:ESP109044-07Filed Date:02/15/2008

Opening Event Date:02/15/2008Case Status:Closed
Record Completed:06/04/2008Post-Decision Matter Pending:
Briefs Completed:
Argued/Submitted:
Disposition:Next Scheduled Action:
Mandate Issued:10/27/2008
Costs Waived

Party Information
Appellate RoleParty NameIFPAttorney(s)Arguing AttorneyE-Filer
PetitionerRobert D. Bynum YPro SeN
RespondentZohery Tours, Inc.N
Michael Hadeed, Jr.NN

Events
Event DateStatusDescriptionResult
02/15/2008PETITION FOR REVIEW (nunc pro tunc)
02/15/2008PETITIONER'S MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
02/26/2008ORDER GRANT PTNR MO TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, and the Clerk shall file the lodged petition for review nunc pro tunc to February 19, 2008. F/ORDERED that Office of Administrative Hearings shall file the record within 60 days from the date of this order. See D.C. App. R. 17. If a hearing was held, the record should include either a certified copy of the transcript of any testimony before the agency or a certified narrative statement of relevant proceedings and evidence in accordance with D.C. App. R. 16 (a)(4). FURTHER ORDERED that respondent shall within 30 days from the date of this order advise this court as to the identity of its counsel. See Moore Energy Resources, Inc. v. Public Serv. Comm'n of the District of Columbia, 785 A.2d 300, 304 (D.C. 2001); D.C. App. R. 15 (a)(5). (ETW)
02/26/2008CERTIFIED COPY OF PETITION TO OAH & MILWEE
03/21/2008RESPONDENT'S MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION for apppintment of counsel
04/07/2008ORDER DENYING RESP MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION for appointment of counsel is denied. It is (MORE)
04/07/2008 F/O that respondent shall within 15 days from the date of this order advise this court as to the identity of its counsel. See Moore Energy Resources, Inc. v. Public Serv. Comm'n of the District of Columbia, 785 A.2d 300, 304 (D.C. 2001); D.C. App. R. 15 (a)(5). Failure to comply with this order shall result in respondent being prohibited from filing its brief. (GP)
04/22/2008APPEARANCE- of Michael M. Hadeed counsel for Zohery Tours, Inc. (respondent)
06/04/2008RECORD ON APPEAL - w/trascripts attached
06/04/2008RECORD COMPLETED
06/10/2008 It appearing that the complete record on appeal has been filed with this court, it is ORDERED that petitioner's brief and the limited appendix, as required by D.C. App. R. 30(f), shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and respondent's brief shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 30, 31. (GP)
07/22/2008 On consideration of this court's order of June 10, 2008, directing petitioner to file the brief, and the limited appendix, as required by D.C.App. R. 30 (f), within 40 days from the date of the order, and it appearing that the brief and the appendix have not been filed, it is ORDERED that the brief of petitioner and the limited appendix shall be submitted within 20 days from the date of this order, accompanied by a motion for leave to file the documents out of time. The motion should set forth good cause for the failure either to timely file the documents or to request an extension of time within which to do so. Failure to comply with this order shall subject this petition for review to dismissal without further notice. See D.C. App. R. 13. (GP)
08/18/2008RESPONDENT'S MOTION TO DISMISS/WITHDRAW APPEAL
08/26/2008PETITIONER'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF
09/08/2008 On consideration of respondent's motion to dismiss this petition for review, and petitioner's motion for an extension of time within which to file his brief and limited appendix, it is ORDERED that petitioner's motion is granted and the brief and limited appendix shall be filed on or before September 29, 2008. Failure to comply with this order shall result in granting respondent's motion to dismiss. It is F/O that respondent's motion to dismiss is held in abeyance pending further order of this court. (ETW)
10/03/2008ORDER: This appeal is hereby dismissed. See D.C. App. R. 13. (By: ETW)
10/03/2008DISMISSED
10/27/2008MANDATE ISSUED