judyrecords
search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

District Of Columbia Court Of Appeals Record

GAYNELL NIXON V. DC DEP'T OF EMPLOYMENT SERVS.

Case Information: 06-AA-1511
Short Caption:GAYNELL NIXON V. DC DEP'T OF EMPLOYMENT SERVS.Classification:Agency - Administrative Agency - Worker's Compensation
Superior Court or Agency Case Number:CRB80-06Filed Date:12/28/2006

Opening Event Date:12/28/2006Case Status:Closed
Record Completed:01/12/2007Post-Decision Matter Pending:
Briefs Completed:10/01/2007
Argued/Submitted:06/04/2008
Disposition:Next Scheduled Action:
Mandate Issued:09/12/2008

Party Information
Appellate RoleParty NameIFPAttorney(s)Arguing AttorneyE-Filer
PetitionerGaynell Nixon N
James Q. Butler YN
RespondentD.C. Department of Employment Services - Worker's Comp.N
Todd S. KimNY
Pastell Vann YN

Events
Event DateStatusDescriptionResult
12/28/2006PETITION FOR REVIEW
12/28/2006FILING FEE of $100.00.
12/29/2006CERTIFIED COPY OF PETITION TO BOARD and Todd Kim, Esq.
01/12/2007RECORD ON APPEAL
01/12/2007RECORD COMPLETED
01/19/2007 It appearing that the complete record on appeal has been filed with this court, it is ORDERED that petitioner's brief and the appendix shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and respondent's brief shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 30, 31. (GP)
02/21/2007PETITIONER'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF until March 30, 2007 (no oppo)
02/23/2007 On consideration of petitioner's motion for an extension of time within which to file the brief, to which no opposition has been filed, it is ORDERED that the motion is granted and petitioner's brief and the appendix shall be filed on or before March 30, 2007. (GP)
03/28/2007PETITIONER'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF 30 days
03/28/2007APPEARANCE - James Q. Butler on behalf of petitioner
04/19/2007 On consideration of petitioner's motion for an extension of time within which to file the brief, to which no opposition has been filed, it is ORDERED that the motion is granted and petitioner's brief and the appendix shall be filed on or before April 30, 2007. Any further requests for an extension of time will granted only upon a showing of good cause. (GP)
05/01/2007PETITIONER'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF no oppo 45 days
05/15/2007 On consideration of petitioner's motion for an extension of time within which to file the brief, to which no opposition has been filed, it is ORDERED that the motion is granted and petitioner's brief and the appendix shall be filed on or before June 14, 2007. (GP)
06/05/2007PETITIONER'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF 45 days
06/13/2007 On consideration of petitioner's motion for an extension of time within which to file the brief, to which no opposition has been filed, it is ORDERED that the motion is granted and petitioner's brief and the appendix shall be filed on or before July 23, 2007. No further requests for extensions of time will be granted absent a showing of good cause. (ETW)
07/23/2007PETITIONER'S BRIEF (no appdx)
08/01/2007 It appearing that the brief of petitioner, was filed with this court on July 23, 2007, and it further appearing that the appendix was due to be filed on or before July 23, 2007, and has not been filed, (See D.C. App. R. 30, 31.), it is ORDERED that petitioner shall within 15 day s from the date of this order submit the appendix, accompanied by a motion for leave to file out of time. The motion should set forth good cause for the failure either to timely file the appendix or to request an extension of time within which to do so. Failure to comply with this order shall subject this appeal to dismissal without further notice. See D.C. App. R. 13. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the brief of respondent shall be filed within 30 days from the date the appendix is filed with this court. (GP)
08/13/2007MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE APPENDIX
08/13/2007RECEIVED - aplt's appendix
08/31/2007 On consideration of petitioner's motion for leave to file the lodged appendix, to which no opposition has been filed, it is ORDERED that petitioner's motion is granted and the lodged appendix is filed. It is FURTHER ORDERED that respondent's brief shall be filed within 30 days from the date of this order. (GP)
08/31/2007APPENDIX
10/01/2007RESPONDENT'S BRIEF
10/01/2007BRIEFS COMPLETED
12/07/2007FINAL SCREENING - REGULAR CALENDAR
01/31/2008 It appearing that this appeal is likely to be calendared for argument during the months of April 2008 thru June 2008, it is ORDERED that counsel shall advise this court in writing by February 19, 2008 of specific dates during that period when they are unavailable so that the court can attempt to avoid such dates in scheduling argument. Counsel must continue to advise the court of availabilities for subsequent months until this case is in fact set for argument. Note that the calendar is prepared approximately two months in advance, e.g. January calendar set for release at the end of November. The court does not encourage the filing of motions to postpone a scheduled argument. If you do seek a change in a scheduled argument date, your motion should both indicate the opponent's position with respect to your request and alternative dates when you and opposing counsel would be available. You may call the Calendar Clerk prior to filing such a motion for information on dates in the scheduled month when the courtroom is available.(aj) Garland Pinkston, Jr. Clerk
04/29/2008CALENDAR NOTICE SENT
05/29/2008PETITIONER'S MOTION TO POSTPONE/CONTINUE ARGUMENT
06/02/2008On consideration fo the motion of petitioner to postpone oral argument, it is ORDERED that the motion is denied. This case remains on the Regular Calendar of June 4, 2008. The partioes are to be present in the District of Columbia Court of Appeals courtroom, located on the sixth floor, at 9:20 a.m. on that date. (GL,TH,NE)
06/02/2008PETITIONER'S MOTION TO POSTPONE/CONTINUE ARGUMENT
06/03/2008On consideration of the motion of petitioner to postpone oral argument, it is ORDERED that the motion is denied. It is FURTHER ORDERED, sua sponte, that this matter shall be submitted for decision on June 4, 2008, without oral argumetn by either party, on the record and briefs alone. (GL,TH,NE)
06/04/2008FiledACTION - Argued / Submitted
06/04/2008SUBMITTED to Judges Glickman, Thompson, Nebeker
08/21/2008AFFIRMED IN PART/REVERSED IN PART Opinion (Glickman, Thompson, Nebeker) and Judgment affirming in part and reversing in part the decision on review and remanding the case to the CRB of the DC DOES for further proceedings.
09/12/2008MANDATE ISSUED