Case Information: 06-CV-1544 | |||
Short Caption: | DOROTHY HANDY V. G. JERRY SHAW, PC | Classification: | Appeals - Civil - Other Civil |
Superior Court or Agency Case Number: | CAC1664-01 | Filed Date: | 12/30/2006 |
| |||
Opening Event Date: | 12/30/2006 | Case Status: | Closed |
Record Completed: | Post-Decision Matter Pending: | ||
Briefs Completed: | |||
Argued/Submitted: | |||
Disposition: | Next Scheduled Action: | ||
Mandate Issued: | 07/16/2007 |
Party Information | |||||||||
Appellate Role | Party Name | IFP | Attorney(s) | Arguing Attorney | E-Filer | ||||
Appellant | Dorothy Handy | N | Pro Se | N | |||||
Appellee | Pc G. Jerry Shaw | N |
|
Events | ||||
Event Date | Status | Description | Result | |
12/30/2006 | NOTICE OF APPEAL | |||
01/08/2007 | APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR STAY (EMERGENCY) and for an Expedited Appeal | |||
01/09/2007 | TMC - appellant's EMERGENCY motion for stay to to expedite appeal - appellant's motion to strike appellee's response | |||
01/22/2007 | APPELLANT'S MOTION TO STRIKE | |||
01/23/2007 | RECEIVED Appellee's response to Appellant's motion for emergency stay pending appeal and for an expedited appeal. | |||
01/30/2007 | ORDER DENYING APPELLANT MOTION TO STRIKE and the Clerk SHALL FILE appellee's lodged response. It is *****MORE***** | |||
01/30/2007 | APPELLEE'S ANSWER/RESPONSE to appellant's motion to strike | |||
01/30/2007 | ORDER DENYING APPELLANT MOTION FOR STAY and to EXPEDITE is DENIED. Appellant has failed to make the showing necessary to justify a stay. See Barry v. Washington Post Co., 529 A.2d 319, 321 (D.C. 1987). It is *****MORE***** | |||
01/30/2007 | FURTHER ORDERED that appellant shall within 20 days from the date of this order SHOW CAUSE why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction as having been prematurely taken from a non-final order. Digital Broad Corp. v. Rosenman & colin, LLP, 847 A.2D 384, 387 N.5 (D.C. 2004);... (KRTHPR) | |||
01/30/2007 | TMC - OTSC - ROTSC | |||
02/20/2007 | RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE to this Court's order dated 1/30/07 | |||
03/01/2007 | ORDERED that this appeal is HEREBY DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. See West v. Morris, 711 A.2d 1269, 1271 (D.C. 1998). Appellant has offered nothing to support her claim that she is being denied her right to jury trial, and thus, nothing to support her further assertion that this case is appealable under the collateral order doctrine. (KRTHPR) | |||
03/01/2007 | DISMISSED | |||
03/09/2007 | APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION | |||
03/12/2007 | TMC - appellant's motion for reconsideration | |||
03/15/2007 | ORDER DENY APPELLANT MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION As this case is pending below, this court lacks authority to review the matter at this time. D.C. Code 11-721 (a)(2001). (KRTHPR) | |||
03/19/2007 | APPELLANT'S PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC (Titled as: Motion for Rehearing En Banc) | |||
03/28/2007 | RECEIVED - Appellee's Response to Aplt's Motion for Reconsideration | |||
07/05/2007 | ORDER DENYING APLT PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC On consideration of aplt's pro se motion for reh en banc, construed as a pet for reh en banc, and the lodged response of aple, it is ORDERED that the Clerk is directed to file the lodged response of aple to the petition. (WHFARZRDGLKRFIBRTH) | |||
07/05/2007 | APPELLEE'S ANSWER/RESPONSE to appellant's pet for reh en banc | |||
07/16/2007 | MANDATE ISSUED |