Case Information: 05-CV-1525 | |||
Short Caption: | JOHN VITIKACS V. THE AMERICAN LEGION | Classification: | Appeals - Civil - Other Civil |
Superior Court or Agency Case Number: | CAB10202-02 | Filed Date: | 12/22/2005 |
| |||
Opening Event Date: | 12/22/2005 | Case Status: | Closed |
Record Completed: | Post-Decision Matter Pending: | ||
Briefs Completed: | |||
Argued/Submitted: | |||
Disposition: | Next Scheduled Action: | ||
Mandate Issued: | 03/20/2006 |
Party Information | |||||||||
Appellate Role | Party Name | IFP | Attorney(s) | Arguing Attorney | E-Filer | ||||
Appellant | John Vitikacs | N | Pro Se | N | |||||
Appellee | American Legion | N |
|
Events | ||||
Event Date | Status | Description | Result | |
12/22/2005 | NOTICE OF APPEAL | |||
01/18/2006 | On consideration of the notice of appeal filed in this case on December 22, 2005, it is ORDERED that appellant shall, within 20 days from the date of this order, complete and file with this court a single copy of the attached statement regarding transcript. Where transcript(s) necessary for this appeal have been ordered and completed for non-appeal purposes, appellant must advise the Court Reporting Division to forward said transcript(s) for inclusion in the record on appeal. If partial transcripts are being ordered, appellant must file a statement of issues to be raised on appeal with this court within 10 days from the date of this order. See D.C. App. R. 10 (b)(3)(A). It is FURTHER ORDERED appellant's failure to respond to any order of this court, including this order, shall subject this appeal to dismissal without further notice for lack of prosecution. See D.C. App. R. 13(a). (BY: GP) | |||
01/23/2006 | APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR STAY | |||
01/23/2006 | MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE (Harold R. Bickham) | Denied as Moot | ||
01/23/2006 | MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE (Patricia L. Ogden) | Denied as Moot | ||
01/25/2006 | STATEMENT REGARDING TRANSCRIPT(S) (RT- ORDERED for 11/17/05) elp | |||
02/03/2006 | APPELLANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS/WITHDRAW APPEAL | |||
02/23/2006 | On consideration of appellant's motion to defer any court ordered fees, construed as a motion to stay, the motions of Patricia L. Ogden, Esquire, and Harold R. Bickman, Esquire, to appeal pro hac vice, and appellant's motion to dismiss this appeal, to which no opposition has been filed, it is ORDERED that appellant's motion to dismiss isgranted, and this appeal is hereby dismissed. See D.C. App. R. 13 (b). It is FURTHER ORDERED that appellant's motion to stay is denied as moot. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the motions of Patricia L. Ogden, Esquire. and Harold R. Bickman, Esquire,to appear pro hac vice, are denied as moot. (ETW) LW/elp | |||
02/23/2006 | DISMISSED | |||
03/20/2006 | MANDATE ISSUED |