judyrecords
search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

District Of Columbia Court Of Appeals Record

JOHN VITIKACS V. THE AMERICAN LEGION

Case Information: 05-CV-1525
Short Caption:JOHN VITIKACS V. THE AMERICAN LEGIONClassification:Appeals - Civil - Other Civil
Superior Court or Agency Case Number:CAB10202-02Filed Date:12/22/2005

Opening Event Date:12/22/2005Case Status:Closed
Record Completed:Post-Decision Matter Pending:
Briefs Completed:
Argued/Submitted:
Disposition:Next Scheduled Action:
Mandate Issued:03/20/2006

Party Information
Appellate RoleParty NameIFPAttorney(s)Arguing AttorneyE-Filer
AppellantJohn Vitikacs NPro SeN
AppelleeAmerican LegionN
Eric Siegel NN

Events
Event DateStatusDescriptionResult
12/22/2005NOTICE OF APPEAL
01/18/2006 On consideration of the notice of appeal filed in this case on December 22, 2005, it is ORDERED that appellant shall, within 20 days from the date of this order, complete and file with this court a single copy of the attached statement regarding transcript. Where transcript(s) necessary for this appeal have been ordered and completed for non-appeal purposes, appellant must advise the Court Reporting Division to forward said transcript(s) for inclusion in the record on appeal. If partial transcripts are being ordered, appellant must file a statement of issues to be raised on appeal with this court within 10 days from the date of this order. See D.C. App. R. 10 (b)(3)(A). It is FURTHER ORDERED appellant's failure to respond to any order of this court, including this order, shall subject this appeal to dismissal without further notice for lack of prosecution. See D.C. App. R. 13(a). (BY: GP)
01/23/2006APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR STAY
01/23/2006MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE (Harold R. Bickham) Denied as Moot
01/23/2006MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE (Patricia L. Ogden) Denied as Moot
01/25/2006STATEMENT REGARDING TRANSCRIPT(S) (RT- ORDERED for 11/17/05) elp
02/03/2006APPELLANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS/WITHDRAW APPEAL
02/23/2006 On consideration of appellant's motion to defer any court ordered fees, construed as a motion to stay, the motions of Patricia L. Ogden, Esquire, and Harold R. Bickman, Esquire, to appeal pro hac vice, and appellant's motion to dismiss this appeal, to which no opposition has been filed, it is ORDERED that appellant's motion to dismiss isgranted, and this appeal is hereby dismissed. See D.C. App. R. 13 (b). It is FURTHER ORDERED that appellant's motion to stay is denied as moot. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the motions of Patricia L. Ogden, Esquire. and Harold R. Bickman, Esquire,to appear pro hac vice, are denied as moot. (ETW) LW/elp
02/23/2006DISMISSED
03/20/2006MANDATE ISSUED