judyrecords
search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

District Of Columbia Court Of Appeals Record

LATOYA D. JONES V. HEUNG-LHO YOON

Case Information: 06-AA-1394
Short Caption:LATOYA D. JONES V. HEUNG-LHO YOONClassification:Agency - Administrative Agency - Employment Services
Superior Court or Agency Case Number:ESP105450-06Filed Date:11/24/2006

Opening Event Date:11/24/2006Case Status:Closed
Record Completed:Post-Decision Matter Pending:
Briefs Completed:
Argued/Submitted:
Disposition:Next Scheduled Action:
Mandate Issued:02/22/2007

Party Information
Appellate RoleParty NameIFPAttorney(s)Arguing AttorneyE-Filer
PetitionerLatoya D. Jones NPro SeN
RespondentHeung-Lho Yoon NPro SeN

Events
Event DateStatusDescriptionResult
11/24/2006PETITION FOR REVIEW (RECEIVED ONLY)
11/24/2006PETITIONER'S MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
12/04/2006 On consideration of the motion and financial information statement of petitioner to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, and the lodged petition for review, and it appearing that the motion to proceed in forma pauperis is incomplete, it is ORDERED that petitioner's motion is denied without prejudice to its renewal within 20 days from the date of this order by filing a fully completed motion and financial information statement. See D.C. App. R. 24(b). It is F/O that this matter is hereby held in abeyance pending further order of this court. (ETW)
01/11/2007 On consideration fo this court's order of December 4, 2006, which directed petitioner to file a fully completed motion and financial information statement, and it appearing that petitioner has failed to comply with the order, it is ORDERED that petitioner shall tender the $100 fee within 10 calendar days from the date of this order. Failure to comply with this order shall result in the dismissal of this petition for review without further notice. (ETW)
01/31/2007 On consideration of this court's order of January 11, 2007, directing petitioner to tender the $100.00 fee as required by D.C. App. R. 15(e), and it appearing that petitioner has failed to comply with the order, it is ORDERED that this appeal is hereby dismissed. See D.C. App. R. 13. (ETW)
01/31/2007DISMISSED
02/22/2007MANDATE ISSUED