Case Information: 06-AA-1394 | |||
Short Caption: | LATOYA D. JONES V. HEUNG-LHO YOON | Classification: | Agency - Administrative Agency - Employment Services |
Superior Court or Agency Case Number: | ESP105450-06 | Filed Date: | 11/24/2006 |
| |||
Opening Event Date: | 11/24/2006 | Case Status: | Closed |
Record Completed: | Post-Decision Matter Pending: | ||
Briefs Completed: | |||
Argued/Submitted: | |||
Disposition: | Next Scheduled Action: | ||
Mandate Issued: | 02/22/2007 |
Party Information | |||||
Appellate Role | Party Name | IFP | Attorney(s) | Arguing Attorney | E-Filer |
Petitioner | Latoya D. Jones | N | Pro Se | N | |
Respondent | Heung-Lho Yoon | N | Pro Se | N |
Events | ||||
Event Date | Status | Description | Result | |
11/24/2006 | PETITION FOR REVIEW (RECEIVED ONLY) | |||
11/24/2006 | PETITIONER'S MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS | |||
12/04/2006 | On consideration of the motion and financial information statement of petitioner to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, and the lodged petition for review, and it appearing that the motion to proceed in forma pauperis is incomplete, it is ORDERED that petitioner's motion is denied without prejudice to its renewal within 20 days from the date of this order by filing a fully completed motion and financial information statement. See D.C. App. R. 24(b). It is F/O that this matter is hereby held in abeyance pending further order of this court. (ETW) | |||
01/11/2007 | On consideration fo this court's order of December 4, 2006, which directed petitioner to file a fully completed motion and financial information statement, and it appearing that petitioner has failed to comply with the order, it is ORDERED that petitioner shall tender the $100 fee within 10 calendar days from the date of this order. Failure to comply with this order shall result in the dismissal of this petition for review without further notice. (ETW) | |||
01/31/2007 | On consideration of this court's order of January 11, 2007, directing petitioner to tender the $100.00 fee as required by D.C. App. R. 15(e), and it appearing that petitioner has failed to comply with the order, it is ORDERED that this appeal is hereby dismissed. See D.C. App. R. 13. (ETW) | |||
01/31/2007 | DISMISSED | |||
02/22/2007 | MANDATE ISSUED |