judyrecords
search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

District Of Columbia Court Of Appeals Record

DIANE OLIVER V. SIRAGE MUSTAFA

Case Information: 06-CV-0205
Short Caption:DIANE OLIVER V. SIRAGE MUSTAFAClassification:Appeals - Civil - Other Civil
Lead:06-CV-0205Consolidated: 06-CV-0508
Superior Court or Agency Case Number:CAB6724-03Filed Date:02/13/2006

Opening Event Date:02/13/2006Case Status:Closed
Record Completed:06/09/2006Post-Decision Matter Pending:
Briefs Completed:10/10/2006
Argued/Submitted:04/02/2007
Disposition:Next Scheduled Action:
Mandate Issued:09/05/2007

Party Information
Appellate RoleParty NameIFPAttorney(s)Arguing AttorneyE-Filer
AppellantDiane Oliver N
Ferris R. BondYN
AppelleeSirage Mustafa N
Stephen J. Spiegelhalter YN

Events
Event DateStatusDescriptionResult
02/13/2006NOTICE OF APPEAL
03/16/2006 On consideration of the notice of appeal filed in this case on February 13, 2006, and it appearing that this appeal has been selected for inclusion in the mandatory mediation pilot program and has been assinged for mediation before a Senior Judge/Mediator of the Multi-Door Dispute Resolution Division designated to participate in in this program, it is ORDERED that appellant must within 20 days from the date of this order complete and file with this court a single copy of the attached statement regarding transcript. Where transcript(s) necessary for this appeal have been ordered and completed for non-appeal purposes, appellant must advise the Court Reporting Division to forward said transcript(s) for inclusion in the record on appeal. If partial transcripts are being ordered, appellant must file a statement of issues to be presented with this court within 10 calendar days from the date of this order. See D.C. App. R. 10 (b)(3)(A). It is ORDERED that counsel for all parties must, within 10 calendar days from the date of this order, individually complete and file the attached Confidential Mediation Statement (CMS) with the Multi-Door Dispute Resolution Division located at 500 Indiana Avenue, N.W., JM Level, Washington, DC 20001. The envelope should be marked to the attention of Appellate Pilot Mediation program. In addition, counsel for appellant must, after consultation with all counsel, complete and file with the CMS the attached date form indicating dates on which all counsel can be available for mediation. Counsel will be contacted by Multi-Door/Senior Judge upon receipt of te forms to schedule the mediation session. A mediation session is expected to be conducted within forty-five days of the date of this order and counsel must give the scheduling of mediation priority. It is FURTHER ORDERED that counsel is required to have his/her party physically present at the mediation session.............................. F/ORDERED that failure of the parties to comply with this order may result in the imposition of sanctions. (BY: GP) (*****See file for complete text of the order)
03/27/2006STATEMENT REGARDING TRANSCRIPT(S) (RT NEEDED/RT ORDERED for 1/23/&5/7/04, 10/14/05, 1/9,1/10,1/11,&1/12/06) COMPLETED elp
05/26/2006 ORDERED, SS, that appeals nos. 06-CV-205 and 06-CV-508 are consolidated for all purposes. It is FURTHER ORDERED that a consolidated briefing order will be issued upon the filing in this court, by the Clerk of the Superior Court, of the record index in accordance with D.C. App. R. 11(b)(30)(A). (BY: ETW) lw
06/07/2006MEDIATION REPORT (NO SETTLEMENT)
06/09/2006RECORD INDEX both
06/09/2006RECORD COMPLETED
06/14/2006 It appearing that the complete record on appeal has been filed with this court, it is ORDERED that appellants' brief and the appendix including the documents required by D.C. App. R. 30 (a)(1), shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and appellees' brief shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 31. (GP) elp
07/24/2006APPELLANT'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF to 8/20/06
08/02/2006RECEIVED - mot to withdraw as counsel (Atty Stekloff was not listed on party screen for aple)
08/02/2006APPELLEE'S OPPOSITION - aptl's motion for extension of time to file brief
08/14/2006 On consideration of appellant's motion for an extension of time within which to file the brief and the appendix, and the opposition thereto, it is ORDERED that the motion is granted and appellant's brief and the appendix shall be filed on or before August 21, 2006. (ETW) elp
08/21/2006APPELLANT'S BRIEF
08/21/2006APPELLANT'S MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION to extend time to file joint appendix until 9/8/06 (no oppo)
08/23/2006 On consideration of appellant's consent motion for an extension of time to file the joint appendix, it is ORDERED that appellant's motion is granted and the joint appendix shall be filed on or before September 8, 2006. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the brief of appellee shall be filed within 30 days from the date the appendix is filed with this court. (GP) elp
09/08/2006APPENDIX - joint vol. I of 4
10/10/2006APPELLEE'S BRIEF
10/10/2006APPENDIX - Appellee's Supplemental Appendix
10/10/2006BRIEFS COMPLETED
11/15/2006FINAL SCREENING - REGULAR CALENDAR
02/02/2007 It appearing that this appeal is likely to be calendared for argument during the months of April 2007 through June 2007, it is ORDERED that counsel shall advise this court in writing by February 19, 2007 of specific dates during that period when they are unavailable so that the court can attempt to avoid such dates in scheduling argument. Counsel must continue to advise the court of availabilities for subsequent months until this case is in fact set for argument. Note that the calendar is prepared approximately two months in advance, e.g. January calendar set for release at the end of November. The court does not encourage the filing of motions to postpone a scheduled argument. If you do seek a change in a scheduled argument date, your motion should both indicate the opponent's position with respect to your request and alternative dates when you and opposing counsel would be available. You may call the Calendar Clerk prior to filing such a motion for information on dates in the scheduled month when the courtroom is available.(aj) Garland Pinkston, Jr. Clerk
02/20/2007LETTER FROM COUNSEL/PARTY RE FUTURE CALENDARING
02/20/2007APPEARANCE - of Stephen J. Spiegelhalter as counsel for the aple (construed as a motion for substition of counsel) elp
02/22/2007COUNSEL'S MOTION TO WITHDRAW FOR BUSINESS REASONS (Aple's Cnsl) Granted
02/28/2007 On consideration of appellee's notice of substituion of counsel construed as a motion for withdrawal of counsel, and the notice of appearance of Stephen J. Spigelhalter, Esquire, on behalf of appellee, it is ORDERED that appellee's motion for withdrawl of counsel is granted and the appearance of Kevin P. Stogner, Esquire, and J. Scott Ballenger, Esquire, are hereby withdrawn. (ETW) elp
03/02/2007CALENDAR NOTICE SENT
04/02/2007FiledACTION - Argued / Submitted
04/02/2007ARGUED before Judges Washington, Farrell, Kramer (at the Washington College of Law of the American University) Ferris R. Bond, Esq. for appellant Stephen J. Spiegelhalter, Esq. for appellee
08/09/2007AFFIRMED Opinion (Washington, Farrell, Kramer) and Judgment affirming the judgment on appeal.
09/05/2007MANDATE ISSUED
09/25/2013FiledArchived