judyrecords
search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

District Of Columbia Court Of Appeals Record

1836 S STREET NW TENANTS ASS'N V. ESTATE OF B. BATTLE ETAL

Case Information: 06-CV-0207
Short Caption:1836 S STREET NW TENANTS ASS'N V. ESTATE OF B. BATTLE ETALClassification:Appeals - Civil - Other Civil
Superior Court or Agency Case Number:CAR1297-05Filed Date:02/17/2006

Opening Event Date:02/17/2006Case Status:Closed
Record Completed:08/16/2006Post-Decision Matter Pending:
Briefs Completed:
Argued/Submitted:
Disposition:Next Scheduled Action:
Mandate Issued:11/02/2006

Party Information
Appellate RoleParty NameIFPAttorney(s)Arguing AttorneyE-Filer
Appellant1836 S Street Nw Tenants AssociationN
Eric M. RomeNY
AppelleeEstate of B. BattleN
Kevin I. KaneNN
AppelleeFarivar Mottaghi N
David B. LambNN

Events
Event DateStatusDescriptionResult
02/17/2006NOTICE OF APPEAL
03/20/2006 ORDERED that appellant shall within 20 days from the date of this order SHOW CAUSE why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction as having been taken from a non-final and non-appealable order of the Superior Court, and for having been untimely filed. See D.C. Code 11-721 (2001); West v. Morris, 711 A.2d 1269, 1271 (D.C. 1998). D.C. App. R. 4 (a). (BY: ETW) lw
03/20/2006TMC - OTSC - response
03/24/2006RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - to 3/26/06
03/29/2006 On consideration of the notice of appeal filed in CA1279-05 on February 17, 2006, this court's order of March 20, 2006, directing appellant to show cause, the response thereto, and it appearing that due to clerical error on the notice, the notice of appeal was ERRONEOUSLY DOCKETED IN THE WRONG CASE, and it further appearing thast all records have been corrected to reflect that the notice of appeal has been timely filed in CA1297-05, and NO TRANSCRIPT IS NEEDED for this appeal, it is ORDERED, SS, that the case caption and the case number are HEREBY CHANGED as indicated above. It is *****MORE*****
03/29/2006 FURTHER ORDERED, SS, that this court's March 20, 2006, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE IS HEREBY VACATED in its entirety. It is *****MORE*****
03/29/2006 FURTHER ORDERED that a briefing order will be issued upon the filing in this court, by the Clerk of the Superior Court, of the record index in accordance with D.C. App. R. 11 (b)(3)(A). (BY: ETW) lw
04/13/2006NOTICE RECEIVED - from Georgetown Properties, Inc. letting court know that they were dismissed from the case while pending before D.C. Superior Ct
08/16/2006RECORD INDEX (Record Index transferred to 06-CV-1460)ta
08/16/2006RECORD COMPLETED
08/24/2006 It appearing that the complete record on appeal has been filed with this court, it is ORDERED that appellant's brief and the appendix including the documents required by D.C. App. R. 30 (a)(1), shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and appellees' briefs shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 31. (GP) elp
10/04/2006 On consideration of this court's order of August 24, 2006, directing appellant to file the brief and the appendix within 40 days and it appearing that the brief and the appendix have not been filed, it is ORDERED that the brief of appellant and the appendix shall be submitted within 20 days from the date of this order, accompanied by a motion for leave to file out of time. The motion should set forth good cause for the failure either to timely file the documents or to request an extension of time within which to do so. Failure to comply with this order shall subject this appeal to dismissal without further notice. See D.C. App. R. 13. (GP) elp
10/25/2006APPELLANT'S MOTION TO REMAND no oppo
10/25/2006APPELLANT'S ANSWER/RESPONSE- to order dated 10/4/06
11/01/2006 On consideration of appellant's response to this court' sorder of October 5, 2006 and appellant's consent motion to remand the case for the trial court to rule on a Super. Civ. Ct. R. 54(b) motion, and it appearing that trial court is incline to granted the requested relief, it is ORDERED that appellant's motion to remand is granted to the extent that the appeal is dismissed ,and the case is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with appellant's motion. Appellant may file a new appeal from the ensuing order and request that the record in this case be transferred to the new appeal. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall issue mandate forthwith. (ETW)
11/01/2006DISMISSED
11/02/2006MANDATE ISSUED