Case Information: 09-CO-0062 | |||
Short Caption: | MONWELL T. ONLEY V. UNITED STATES | Classification: | Appeals - Criminal Other - Other Criminal |
Superior Court or Agency Case Number: | FEL5490-02 | Filed Date: | 01/13/2009 |
| |||
Opening Event Date: | 01/13/2009 | Case Status: | Closed |
Record Completed: | 04/06/2009 | Post-Decision Matter Pending: | |
Briefs Completed: | |||
Argued/Submitted: | |||
Disposition: | Next Scheduled Action: | ||
Mandate Issued: | 09/14/2009 | ||
Costs Waived |
Party Information | ||||||||||||
Appellate Role | Party Name | IFP | Attorney(s) | Arguing Attorney | E-Filer | |||||||
Appellant | Monwell T. Onley | Y | Pro Se | N | ||||||||
Appellee | United States | N |
|
Events | ||||
Event Date | Status | Description | Result | |
01/13/2009 | NOTICE OF APPEAL | |||
02/03/2009 | ORDERED that appellant shall within 20 days from the date of this order SHOW CAUSE why this appeal should not be dismissed as having been UNTIMELY FILED. See D.C. App. R. 4 (b). (BY: ETW) | |||
02/03/2009 | TMC - OTSC - ROTSC | |||
02/19/2009 | RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE (Appellant's) | |||
02/27/2009 | On consideration of this court's order to show cause, appellant's response, it is O that appeal is hereby held in abeyance and appellan will, w/in 30 days, file an affidavit or statement conforming tothe requirements of DC App R 4 (d).....see order. Failur eot do so will result in dismissal of appeal. (RZBETE) | |||
02/27/2009 | CASE STAYED | |||
03/10/2009 | AFFIDAVIT, from Appellant, per court's order dated 2/27/09. | |||
03/17/2009 | On consideration of this court's February 3, 2009, OTSC, the response thereto, and on further consideration of this court's February 27, 2009, order which HELD THE APPEAL IN ABYEANCE, and it appearing that the NOA WAS TIMELY FILED pursuant to D.C. App. R. 4 (d), since it was deposited in the institution's internal mail system before the last day for filing...and NO TRANSCRIPT IS NEEDED FOR THIS APPEAL, it is ORDERED that this court's OTSC IS HEREBY VACATED IN ITS ENTIRETY. It is *****MORE***** | |||
03/17/2009 | FURTHER ORDERED that the February 27, 2009, STAY OF THE APPEAL IS HEREBY LIFTED and this APPEAL SHALL PROCEED. It is *****MORE***** | |||
03/17/2009 | FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Superior Court shall transmit the record index and record copies to this court forthwith. It is FURTHER ORDERED that appellant's brief and the limited appendix...shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order and appellee's brief within 30 days thereafter. (BY: ETW) lw | |||
04/06/2009 | RECORD INDEX | |||
04/06/2009 | RECORD COPIES | |||
04/06/2009 | RECORD COMPLETED | |||
04/09/2009 | APPELLANT'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF | |||
04/29/2009 | RECEIVED appellant's brief and limited appendix | |||
04/29/2009 | error | |||
05/06/2009 | On consideration of appellant's motion for an extension of time within which to file the brief, to which no opposition has been filed, and the lodged brief and limited appendix, it is ORDERED that appellant's motion is granted and the lodged brief and limited appendix are filed. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the brief of appellee_ shall be filed with this court within 30 days from the date of this order. (By: GP) | |||
05/06/2009 | APPELLANT'S BRIEF/appendix | |||
06/05/2009 | APLE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO SUPPLEMENT THE RECORD | |||
06/05/2009 | APPELLEE'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY AFFIRMANCE | |||
06/09/2009 | TMC - motion for summary affirmance - appellee's motion to supplement the record | |||
06/29/2009 | ORDERED that appellee's MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT THE RECORD IS GRANTED. It is *****MORE***** | |||
06/29/2009 | FURTHER ORDERED that APPELLEE'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY AFFIRMANCE IS GRANTED. Oliver T. Carr Mgm't, INc. v. Nat'l Deli, Inc., 397 A.2d 914, 915 (D.C. 1979)... It is *****MORE***** | |||
06/29/2009 | FURTHER ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the order is HEREBY AFFIRMED. (RZGLTE) | |||
07/08/2009 | RECEIVED Appellant's Reply Brief. | |||
07/14/2009 | APPELLANT'S PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC | |||
09/02/2009 | ORDER DENYING APLT PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC (pro se petition) (WHRZRDGLKRBRTHOB) (Judge Fisher is recused from this case.) | |||
09/14/2009 | MANDATE ISSUED | |||
04/24/2014 | Filed | Archived |