judyrecords
search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

District Of Columbia Court Of Appeals Record

MONWELL T. ONLEY V. UNITED STATES

Case Information: 09-CO-0062
Short Caption:MONWELL T. ONLEY V. UNITED STATESClassification:Appeals - Criminal Other - Other Criminal
Superior Court or Agency Case Number:FEL5490-02Filed Date:01/13/2009

Opening Event Date:01/13/2009Case Status:Closed
Record Completed:04/06/2009Post-Decision Matter Pending:
Briefs Completed:
Argued/Submitted:
Disposition:Next Scheduled Action:
Mandate Issued:09/14/2009
Costs Waived

Party Information
Appellate RoleParty NameIFPAttorney(s)Arguing AttorneyE-Filer
AppellantMonwell T. Onley YPro SeN
AppelleeUnited StatesN
Roy W. McLeese, IIINN
J. Thomas Spiggle NN

Events
Event DateStatusDescriptionResult
01/13/2009NOTICE OF APPEAL
02/03/2009 ORDERED that appellant shall within 20 days from the date of this order SHOW CAUSE why this appeal should not be dismissed as having been UNTIMELY FILED. See D.C. App. R. 4 (b). (BY: ETW)
02/03/2009TMC - OTSC - ROTSC
02/19/2009RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE (Appellant's)
02/27/2009On consideration of this court's order to show cause, appellant's response, it is O that appeal is hereby held in abeyance and appellan will, w/in 30 days, file an affidavit or statement conforming tothe requirements of DC App R 4 (d).....see order. Failur eot do so will result in dismissal of appeal. (RZBETE)
02/27/2009CASE STAYED
03/10/2009AFFIDAVIT, from Appellant, per court's order dated 2/27/09.
03/17/2009 On consideration of this court's February 3, 2009, OTSC, the response thereto, and on further consideration of this court's February 27, 2009, order which HELD THE APPEAL IN ABYEANCE, and it appearing that the NOA WAS TIMELY FILED pursuant to D.C. App. R. 4 (d), since it was deposited in the institution's internal mail system before the last day for filing...and NO TRANSCRIPT IS NEEDED FOR THIS APPEAL, it is ORDERED that this court's OTSC IS HEREBY VACATED IN ITS ENTIRETY. It is *****MORE*****
03/17/2009 FURTHER ORDERED that the February 27, 2009, STAY OF THE APPEAL IS HEREBY LIFTED and this APPEAL SHALL PROCEED. It is *****MORE*****
03/17/2009 FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Superior Court shall transmit the record index and record copies to this court forthwith. It is FURTHER ORDERED that appellant's brief and the limited appendix...shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order and appellee's brief within 30 days thereafter. (BY: ETW) lw
04/06/2009RECORD INDEX
04/06/2009RECORD COPIES
04/06/2009RECORD COMPLETED
04/09/2009APPELLANT'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF
04/29/2009RECEIVED appellant's brief and limited appendix
04/29/2009error
05/06/2009 On consideration of appellant's motion for an extension of time within which to file the brief, to which no opposition has been filed, and the lodged brief and limited appendix, it is ORDERED that appellant's motion is granted and the lodged brief and limited appendix are filed. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the brief of appellee_ shall be filed with this court within 30 days from the date of this order. (By: GP)
05/06/2009APPELLANT'S BRIEF/appendix
06/05/2009APLE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO SUPPLEMENT THE RECORD
06/05/2009APPELLEE'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY AFFIRMANCE
06/09/2009TMC - motion for summary affirmance - appellee's motion to supplement the record
06/29/2009 ORDERED that appellee's MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT THE RECORD IS GRANTED. It is *****MORE*****
06/29/2009 FURTHER ORDERED that APPELLEE'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY AFFIRMANCE IS GRANTED. Oliver T. Carr Mgm't, INc. v. Nat'l Deli, Inc., 397 A.2d 914, 915 (D.C. 1979)... It is *****MORE*****
06/29/2009 FURTHER ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the order is HEREBY AFFIRMED. (RZGLTE)
07/08/2009RECEIVED Appellant's Reply Brief.
07/14/2009APPELLANT'S PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
09/02/2009ORDER DENYING APLT PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC (pro se petition) (WHRZRDGLKRBRTHOB) (Judge Fisher is recused from this case.)
09/14/2009MANDATE ISSUED
04/24/2014FiledArchived