EDMUND B. OLUMEKOR V. WASHINGTON HOSPITAL CENTER

Case Information: 06-AA-0218
Short Caption:	EDMUND B. OLUMEKOR V. WASHINGTON HOSPITAL CENTER	Classification:	Agency - Administrative Agency - Employment Services
Superior Court or Agency Case Number:	ESP103508-06	Filed Date:	03/10/2006
Opening Event Date:	03/10/2006	Case Status:	Closed
Record Completed:	01/09/2007	Post-Decision Matter Pending:
Briefs Completed:
Argued/Submitted:
Disposition:		Next Scheduled Action:
Mandate Issued:	04/26/2007
		Costs Waived

Events
Event Date	Status	Description	Result
03/10/2006		PETITION FOR REVIEW (nunc pro tunc)
03/10/2006		PETITIONER'S MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
03/21/2006		On consideration of the motion and financial information statement of petitioner to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, and the lodged petition for review, and it appearing that Washington Hospital Center is a business that must be represented by counsel, it is ( M O R E )
03/21/2006		ORDER GRANT PTNR MO TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, and the Clerk shall file the lodged petition for review nunc pro tunc to March 10, 2006. It is F/ORDERED that the Office of Administrative Hearings shall file the administrative record w/in 60 days from the date of this order. See D.C. App. R. 17. If a hearing was held, the record should include either a certified copy of the transcript of any testimony before the agency or a certified narrative statement of relevant proceedings and evidence in accordance with D.C. App. R. 16 (a)(4). It is ( M O R E)
03/21/2006		ORDER GRANT PTNR MO TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, and the Clerk shall file the lodged petition for review nunc pro tunc to March 10, 2006. It is F/ORDERED that the Office of Administrative Hearings shall file the administrative record w/in 60 days from the date of this order. See D.C. App. R. 17. If a hearing was held, the record should include either a certified copy of the transcript of any testimony before the agency or a certified narrative statementof relevant proceedings and evidence in accordance with D.C. App. R. 16 (a)(4). It is F/ORDERED that Washington Hospital Center shall w/in 15 days from the date of this order advise this court as to the identity of its counsel. See Moore Energy Resources, Inc. v. Public Serv. Comm'n of the District of Columbia. 785 A.2d 300, 304 (D.C. 2001); D.C. App. R. 15 (a)(5). (ETW)
03/21/2006		CERTIFIED COPY OF PETITION TO BOARD AND MILWEE.
04/05/2006		APPEARANCE - of Keith J.Harrison & Daniel M. Creekman on behalf of respondent
09/22/2006		RESPONDENT'S MOTION TO DISMISS/WITHDRAW APPEAL
09/22/2006		STATEMENT- respondent rule 28 (a) disclosure statement
10/04/2006		On consideration of respondent's motion to dismiss appeal, it is ORDERED that respondent's motion to dismiss is denied. See D.C. Code Section 2-1831.16(h), et. seq. (2006 Suppl.). (ETW)
11/13/2006		SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD #1 (1/31/06 hearing of OAH)
12/18/2006		CHANGE OF ADDRESS RECEIVED Keith J. Harrison Crowwell & Moring LLP 1001 Pennsylvania Ave., NW Washington, DC 20004 202 624-2560
01/09/2007		RECORD ON APPEAL
01/09/2007		RECORD COMPLETED
01/11/2007		It appearing that the complete record on appeal has been filed with this court, it is ORDERED that petitioner's brief and the limited appendix, as required by D.C. App. R. 30(f), shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and respondent's brief shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 30, 31. (GP)
02/23/2007		On consideration of this court's order of January 11, 2007, directing petitioner to file the brief, and the limited appendix, as required by D.C. App. R. 30 (f), within 40 days from the date of the order, and it appearing that the brief and the appendix have not been filed, it is ORDERED that the brief of petitioner and the limited appendix shall be submitted within 20 days from the date of this order, accompanied by a motion for leave to file the documents out of time. The motion should set forth good cause for the failure either to timely file the documents or to request an extension of time within which to do so. Failure to comply with this order shall subject this petition for review to dismissal without further notice. See D.C. App. R. 13. (GP)
03/30/2007		On consideration of this court's order of February 23, 2007, directing petitioenr to submit the brief and limited appendix, accompanied by a motion for leave to file out of time, and it appearing that petitioner has failed to comply with the order, it is ORDERED that this petition for review is hereby dismissed. See D.C. App. R. 13. (MWF)
03/30/2007		DISMISSED
04/26/2007		MANDATE ISSUED