judyrecords
search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

District Of Columbia Court Of Appeals Record

JACQUELINE MURDOCK V. NATIONAL WHOLESALE LIQUIDATORS

Case Information: 06-AA-0049
Short Caption:JACQUELINE MURDOCK V. NATIONAL WHOLESALE LIQUIDATORSClassification:Agency - Administrative Agency - Employment Services
Superior Court or Agency Case Number:ESP103261-05Filed Date:01/19/2006

Opening Event Date:01/19/2006Case Status:Closed
Record Completed:07/31/2006Post-Decision Matter Pending:
Briefs Completed:
Argued/Submitted:
Disposition:Next Scheduled Action:
Mandate Issued:11/09/2006
Costs Waived

Party Information
Appellate RoleParty NameIFPAttorney(s)Arguing AttorneyE-Filer
PetitionerJacqueline Murdock YPro SeN
RespondentNational Wholesale LiquidatorsN

Events
Event DateStatusDescriptionResult
01/19/2006PETITION FOR REVIEW (nunc pro tunc)
01/19/2006PETITIONER'S MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
01/25/2006 On consideration of the motion and affidavit of petitioner to proceed on appeal in in forma pauperis, and lodged petition for review, and it appearing that National Wholesale Liquidators is a business that must be represented by counsel, it is ORDERED that the motion is granted and the petitioner shall proceed in forma pauperis. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall file the lodged petiton for review nunc pro tunc to January 19, 2006. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the Office of Administrative Hearings shall file the administrative record within 60 days from the date of this order. See D.C. App. R. 17. If a hearing was held, the record should include either a certified copy of the transcript of any testimony before the agency or a certified narrative statment of relevant proceedins and evidence in accordance with D.C. App. R. 16 (a)(4). It is FURTHER ORDERED that the National Wholesale Liquidators shall within 15 days from the date of this order advise this court as to the identity of its counsel. See Moore Energy Resources, Inc, v. Public Serv. Comm'n of the District of Columbia, 785 A.2d 300, 304 (D.C. 2001); D.C. App. R. 15 (a)(5). (ETW) elp
07/11/2006 On consideration fo the court's order of Jan. 25, 2006, directing respondent to identify its counsel within 15 days from the date of the order and it appearing that respondent has failed to comply with the order, it is ORDERED that respondent shall within 10 days from the date of this order advise this court as to the identity of its counsel. See Moore Energy Resources, Inc. v. Public Serv. Comm'n of the District of Columbia, 785 A.2d 300, 304 (D.C. 2001); D.C. App. R. 15(a)(5). Failure to comply with this order shall result in respondent being prohibited from filing its brief. (ETW)
07/31/2006RECORD ON APPEAL
07/31/2006RECORD COMPLETED
08/02/2006 It appearing that the complete record on appeal has been filed with this court, it is ORDERED that petitioner's brief and the limited appendix, as required by D.C. App. R. 30(f), shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and respondent's brief shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 30, 31. (GP)
09/18/2006 On consideration of this court's order of August 2, 2006, directing petitioner to file the brief, and the limited appendix, as required by D.C.App. R. 30 (f), within 40 days from the date of the order, and it appearing that the brief and the appendix have not been filed, it is ORDERED that the brief of petitioner and the limited appendix shall be submitted within 20 days from the date of this order, accompanied by a motion for leave to file the documents out of time. The motion should set forth good cause for the failure either to timely file the documents or to request an extension of time within which to do so. Failure to comply with this order shall subject this petition for review to dismissal without further notice. See D.C. App. R. 13. (GP)
10/17/2006 On consideration of this court's order of September 18, 2006, directing petitioner to submit the brief, accompanied by a motion for leave to file out of time, and it appearing that petitioner has failed to comply with the order, it is ORDERED that this petition for revivew is hereby dismissed. See D.C. App. R. 13. (ETW)
10/17/2006DISMISSED
11/09/2006MANDATE ISSUED