Case Information: 06-AA-0049 | |||
Short Caption: | JACQUELINE MURDOCK V. NATIONAL WHOLESALE LIQUIDATORS | Classification: | Agency - Administrative Agency - Employment Services |
Superior Court or Agency Case Number: | ESP103261-05 | Filed Date: | 01/19/2006 |
| |||
Opening Event Date: | 01/19/2006 | Case Status: | Closed |
Record Completed: | 07/31/2006 | Post-Decision Matter Pending: | |
Briefs Completed: | |||
Argued/Submitted: | |||
Disposition: | Next Scheduled Action: | ||
Mandate Issued: | 11/09/2006 | ||
Costs Waived |
Party Information | |||||
Appellate Role | Party Name | IFP | Attorney(s) | Arguing Attorney | E-Filer |
Petitioner | Jacqueline Murdock | Y | Pro Se | N | |
Respondent | National Wholesale Liquidators | N |
Events | ||||
Event Date | Status | Description | Result | |
01/19/2006 | PETITION FOR REVIEW (nunc pro tunc) | |||
01/19/2006 | PETITIONER'S MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS | |||
01/25/2006 | On consideration of the motion and affidavit of petitioner to proceed on appeal in in forma pauperis, and lodged petition for review, and it appearing that National Wholesale Liquidators is a business that must be represented by counsel, it is ORDERED that the motion is granted and the petitioner shall proceed in forma pauperis. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall file the lodged petiton for review nunc pro tunc to January 19, 2006. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the Office of Administrative Hearings shall file the administrative record within 60 days from the date of this order. See D.C. App. R. 17. If a hearing was held, the record should include either a certified copy of the transcript of any testimony before the agency or a certified narrative statment of relevant proceedins and evidence in accordance with D.C. App. R. 16 (a)(4). It is FURTHER ORDERED that the National Wholesale Liquidators shall within 15 days from the date of this order advise this court as to the identity of its counsel. See Moore Energy Resources, Inc, v. Public Serv. Comm'n of the District of Columbia, 785 A.2d 300, 304 (D.C. 2001); D.C. App. R. 15 (a)(5). (ETW) elp | |||
07/11/2006 | On consideration fo the court's order of Jan. 25, 2006, directing respondent to identify its counsel within 15 days from the date of the order and it appearing that respondent has failed to comply with the order, it is ORDERED that respondent shall within 10 days from the date of this order advise this court as to the identity of its counsel. See Moore Energy Resources, Inc. v. Public Serv. Comm'n of the District of Columbia, 785 A.2d 300, 304 (D.C. 2001); D.C. App. R. 15(a)(5). Failure to comply with this order shall result in respondent being prohibited from filing its brief. (ETW) | |||
07/31/2006 | RECORD ON APPEAL | |||
07/31/2006 | RECORD COMPLETED | |||
08/02/2006 | It appearing that the complete record on appeal has been filed with this court, it is ORDERED that petitioner's brief and the limited appendix, as required by D.C. App. R. 30(f), shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and respondent's brief shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 30, 31. (GP) | |||
09/18/2006 | On consideration of this court's order of August 2, 2006, directing petitioner to file the brief, and the limited appendix, as required by D.C.App. R. 30 (f), within 40 days from the date of the order, and it appearing that the brief and the appendix have not been filed, it is ORDERED that the brief of petitioner and the limited appendix shall be submitted within 20 days from the date of this order, accompanied by a motion for leave to file the documents out of time. The motion should set forth good cause for the failure either to timely file the documents or to request an extension of time within which to do so. Failure to comply with this order shall subject this petition for review to dismissal without further notice. See D.C. App. R. 13. (GP) | |||
10/17/2006 | On consideration of this court's order of September 18, 2006, directing petitioner to submit the brief, accompanied by a motion for leave to file out of time, and it appearing that petitioner has failed to comply with the order, it is ORDERED that this petition for revivew is hereby dismissed. See D.C. App. R. 13. (ETW) | |||
10/17/2006 | DISMISSED | |||
11/09/2006 | MANDATE ISSUED |