Events |
Event Date | Status | Description | Result |
01/17/2006 | | NOTICE OF APPEAL | |
01/27/2006 | | ORDER, SUA SPONTE, CONSOLIDATING APPEALS nos. 06-CO-53, 06-CO-54 and 06-CO-55 wiht previously consolidated appeals nos. 05-CO-828, 05-CO-829 and 05-CO-830. It is FURTHER ORDERED that a consolidated briefing order will be issued upon the filing in this court, by the Clerk of the Superior Court, of the record indexes and record copies in accordance with D.C. App. R. 11 (b)(3)(A). (By: GP) | |
02/02/2006 | | RECORD INDEX in 06-CO-53. | |
02/02/2006 | | RECORD COPIES in 06-CO-53. | |
02/02/2006 | | RECORD INDEX in 06-CO-55. | |
02/02/2006 | | RECORD COPIES in 06-CO-55. | |
02/02/2006 | | RECORD INDEX in 06-CO-829. | |
02/02/2006 | | RECORD COPIES in 05-CO-829. | |
02/02/2006 | | RECORD INDEX in 06-CO-54. | |
02/02/2006 | | RECORD COPIES in 06-CO-54. | |
02/02/2006 | | RECORD INDEX in 05-CO-830. | |
02/02/2006 | | RECORD COPIES in 05-CO-830. | |
02/02/2006 | | RECORD INDEX in 05-CO-828. | |
02/02/2006 | | RECORD COPIES in 05-CO-828. | |
02/02/2006 | | RECORD COMPLETED | |
02/08/2006 | | It appearing that the complete records on appeal have been filed with this court, it is ORDERED that appellant's brief and the limited appendix including the documents required by D.C. App. R. 30 (f), shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and appellee's brief shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 31. (By: GP) | |
03/27/2006 | | On consideration of this court's order of Feruary 8, 2006, directing appellant to file the brief, and the limited appendix, as required by D.C. App. R. 30 (f), within 40 days and it appearing that the brief and the limited appendix have not been filed with this court, it is ORDERED that the brief of appellant and the limited appendix shall be submitted within 20 days from the date of this order, accompanied by a motion for leave to file out of time. The motion should set forth good cause for the failure either to timely file the documents or to request an extension of time within which to do so. Failure to comply with this order shall subject this appeal to dismissal without further notice. See D.C. App. R. 13. (By: GP) | |
04/12/2006 | | LETTER from appellant requesting an extension of time to file his appendix and brief (To be construed as a motion for an extension of time to file brief and the appendix). | |
04/13/2006 | | APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE BRIEF and appendix. | |
04/13/2006 | | RECEIVED appellant's brief. | |
04/13/2006 | | RECEIVED appellant's appendix attached to brief. | |
04/27/2006 | | On consideration of appellant's motion for an extension of time within which to file the brief, to which no opposition has been filed, and appellant's motion for leave to file the lodged brief and the limited appendix, to which no opposition has been filed, it is ORDERED that appellant's motions are granted and the lodged brief and the limited appendix are filed. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the brief of appellee shall be filed with this court on or before May 15, 2006. (By: GP) | |
04/27/2006 | | APPELLANT'S BRIEF | |
04/27/2006 | | APPENDIX | |
05/04/2006 | | APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL ***filed as a letter | |
05/15/2006 | | APPELLEE'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY AFFIRMANCE | |
05/16/2006 | | TMC - motion for summary affirmance - appellant's brief | |
05/18/2006 | | ORDER DENYING APLT MO FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL and appellant's response, if any, to the motion for summary affirmance shall be filed on or before May 31, 2006. It is *****MORE***** | |
05/18/2006 | | FURTHER ORDERED that appellee's motion for summary affirmance is HEREBY HELD IN ABEYANCE pending further order of this court. (BY: ETW) lw | |
05/24/2006 | | LETTER from appellant requesting an extention of time to respond to appellee's motion for Summary Affirmance, etc. | |
06/02/2006 | | APPELLANT'S ANSWER/RESPONSE to appelle's motion for Summary Affirmance. | |
06/06/2006 | | ORDERED that appellee's MOTION FOR SUMMARY AFFIRMANCE IS GRANTED. See Taylor v. U.S., 603 A.2d 451 (D.C. 1992)(Orders denying motion to reconsider in criminal cases are not appealable orders.) and Walden v. U.S., 366 A.2d 1075 (D.c. 1976)(This court reviews the trial court's decision in D.C. Super. Ct. Crim. R.35 motions only for abuse of discretion.). It is *****MORE***** | |
06/06/2006 | | FURTHER ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the orders on appeal are HEREBY AFFIRMED. (RDGLBE) | |
06/29/2006 | | MANDATE ISSUED | |
08/23/2006 | | RECEIVED pro se letter from appellant regarding. ruling on motion for summary affirmance. (File Room) | |