Case Information: 06-CV-0057 | |||
Short Caption: | ALBERT TABI V. ENTERPRISE LEASING CO., ET AL. | Classification: | Appeals - Civil - Torts |
Superior Court or Agency Case Number: | CAB7481-03 | Filed Date: | 01/11/2006 |
| |||
Opening Event Date: | 01/11/2006 | Case Status: | Closed |
Record Completed: | 01/29/2007 | Post-Decision Matter Pending: | |
Briefs Completed: | |||
Argued/Submitted: | |||
Disposition: | Next Scheduled Action: | ||
Mandate Issued: | 06/21/2007 | ||
Costs Waived |
Party Information | |||||||||
Appellate Role | Party Name | IFP | Attorney(s) | Arguing Attorney | E-Filer | ||||
Appellant | Albert Tabi | Y | Pro Se | N | |||||
Appellee | Enterprise Leasing Co. | N |
| ||||||
Appellee | Jose Thomas Aguila | N |
| ||||||
Appellee | Delores Pacheco | N |
|
Events | ||||
Event Date | Status | Description | Result | |
01/11/2006 | NOTICE OF APPEAL | |||
01/25/2006 | On consideration of the notice of appeal filed in this case on January 11, 2006, it is ORDERED that appellant shall, within 20 days from the date of this order, complete and file with this court a single copy of the attached statement regarding transcript. Where transcript(s) necessary for this appeal have been ordered and completed for non-appeal purposes, appellant must advise the Court Reporting Division to forward said transcript(s) for inclusion in the record on appeal. If partial transcripts are being ordered, appellant must file a statement of issues to be raised on appeal with this court within 10 days from the date of this order. See D.C. App. R. 10 (b)(3)(A). It is FURTHER ORDERED appellant's failure to respond to any order of this court, including this order, shall subject this appeal to dismissal without further notice for lack of prosecution. See D.C. App. R. 13(a). (BY: GP) | |||
02/27/2006 | On consideration of this court's order of January 25, 2006, directing appellant to file the statement regarding transcript, within 20 days, and it appearing that appellant has failed to comply with the order, it is ORDERED that this appeal is hereby dismissed.See D.C. App. R. 13. (ETW) elp | |||
02/27/2006 | DISMISSED | |||
03/08/2006 | APPELLANT'S MOTION TO REINSTATE APPEAL | |||
03/08/2006 | RECEIVED- statement regarding transcripts | |||
03/08/2006 | RECEIVED- aplt's motion to proceed informa pauperis | |||
03/30/2006 | On consideration of appellant's motion to reinstate this appeal, and upon further consideration of this court's order of February 27, 2006, dismissing this appeal for appellant's failure to file the statement regarding transcripts, and appellant's motion and financial information statement to proceed on appeal informa pauperis, and the lodged statement regarding transcripts, it is ORDERED that the appellant's motion to reinstate is granted and this appeal is hereby reinstated. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall file the lodged statement regarding transcripts. It is FURTHER ORDERED that appellant's motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis is granted. It is FURTHER ORDERED that appellant shall, within 10 calendar days from the date of this order, file with the Appeals Coordinator's Office a request for preparation of transcripts of proceedings in the Superior court, on motion with notice, to the approproate motions or trial judge , for determination in accordance with Hancock V. Mutualof Omaha Ins. Co., 472 A. 2d 867 (D.C. 1984). See D.C. App. R. 10 (b)(5)(A). It is FURTHER ORDERED that appellant shall simultaneously submit a file-stamped copy of that document with this court. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Superior Court shall prepare and transmit the record index and record copies to this court including all ordered transcripts. See D.C. App. R. 10 (b)(5), 11 (b)(3). It is FURTHER ORDERED that appellant's failure to respond to any order of this court, including thisorder shall subject this appeal to dismissal without further notice for lack of prosecution. See D.C. App. R. 13(a). (ETW) elp | |||
03/30/2006 | STATEMENT REGARDING TRANSCRIPT(S) (RT NEEDED - COMPLETE TRANSCRIPT) | |||
03/30/2006 | APPELLANT'S MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS | |||
04/04/2006 | RECEIVED (Motion for Appeal Transcript) (Transcript Approved for 4/14/05, 7/20/05/9/16/05 & 12/19/05) GRANTED 4/11/06 elp Note: 4/14/05 cancelled as no hearing. 7/20/05 cancelled. | |||
01/11/2007 | SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD #1 (7-pgs/allison 9/16/05 proc.) | |||
01/11/2007 | SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD #2 (104-pgs/12/19/05 proc.) | |||
01/29/2007 | RECORD INDEX | |||
01/29/2007 | RECORD COPIES | |||
01/29/2007 | RECORD COMPLETED | |||
02/06/2007 | It appearing that the complete record on appeal has been filed with this court, it is ORDERED that appellant's brief and the limited appendix including the documents required by D.C. App. R. 30 (f), shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and appellees' briefs shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 31. (GP) elp | |||
04/10/2007 | On consideration of this court's order of February 06, 2007, directing appellant to file the brief, and the limited appendix, as required by D.C.App. R. 30 (f), within 40 days and it appearing that the brief and the limited appendix have not been filed with this court, it is ORDERED that the brief of appellant and the limited appendix shall be submitted within 20 days from the date of this order, accompanied by amotion for leave to file out of time. The motion should set forth good cause for the failureeither to timely file the documents or to request an extension of time within which to do so. Failure to comply with this order shall subject this appeal to dismissal without further notice. See D.C. App. R. 13. (GP) elp | |||
04/19/2007 | APPELLEE'S MOTION TO DISMISS/WITHDRAW APPEAL | |||
05/29/2007 | On consideration of appellee Enterprise Leasing Company's motion to dismiss this appeal and upon further consideration of this court's order of April 10, 2007, directing appellant to submit the brief and the appendix, accompanied by a motion for leave to file out of time, within 20 days from the date of the order, and it appearing that appellant has failed to complay, it is ORDERED that appellee Enterprise Leasing Company's motion to dismiss is granted and this appeal is hereby dismissed. See D.C. App. R. 13. (ETW) elp | |||
05/29/2007 | DISMISSED | |||
06/21/2007 | MANDATE ISSUED |