judyrecords
search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

District Of Columbia Court Of Appeals Record

LUSTRE CLEANERS OF CAPITOL HILL V. DC DEPT CONS. REG. AFFAIR

Case Information: 08-AA-0193
Short Caption:LUSTRE CLEANERS OF CAPITOL HILL V. DC DEPT CONS. REG. AFFAIRClassification:Agency - Administrative Agency - Dept of Consumer & Regulatory Affairs (DCRA)
Superior Court or Agency Case Number:CRIS700554-07Filed Date:03/11/2008

Opening Event Date:03/11/2008Case Status:Closed
Record Completed:05/19/2008Post-Decision Matter Pending:
Briefs Completed:
Argued/Submitted:
Disposition:Next Scheduled Action:
Mandate Issued:08/28/2008

Party Information
Appellate RoleParty NameIFPAttorney(s)Arguing AttorneyE-Filer
PetitionerLustre Cleaners of Capitol Hill, Inc.N
Henry E. Weil NN
RespondentD.C. Department of Consumer and Regulatory AffairsN
Todd S. KimNY

Events
Event DateStatusDescriptionResult
03/11/2008PETITION FOR REVIEW
03/11/2008FILING FEE of $100.00 paid
03/11/2008CERTIFIED COPY OF PETITION TO BOARD and Todd S. Kim, Esquire (OAG)
03/20/2008 On consideration of the petition for review in this matter, and it appearing that Lustre Cleaners of Capitol Hill, is a business that must be represented by counsel, it is ORDERED that petitioner shall within 15 days from the date of this order advise this court as to the identity of its counsel. See Moore Energy Resources, Inc. v. Public Serv. Comm'n of the District of Columbia, 785 A.2d 300, 304 (D.C. 2001); D.C. App. R. 15 (a)(5). Failure to comply with this order shall subject this petition for review to dismissal without further notice. It is F/ORDERED that the Office of the Administrative Hearings shall file the administrative record within 60 days from the date of this order. See D.C. App. R. 17. If a hearing was held, the record should include either a certified copy of the transcript of any testimony before the agency or a certified narrative statement of relevant proceedings and evidence in accordance with D.C. App. R. 16 (a)(4). (GP)
04/03/2008PETITIONER'S MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION for extension of time to file response 30 days
04/22/2008APPEARANCE - of Henry E. Weil on behalf of petitioner
04/29/2008 On consideration of petitioner's motion for an extension of time within which to identify its counsel, and the entry of appearance of Henry E. Weil, Esquire, on behalf of petitioner, it is ORDERED that petitioner's motion is denied as moot. (ETW)
05/19/2008RECORD ON APPEAL
05/19/2008RECORD COMPLETED
05/23/2008 It appearing that the complete record on appeal has been filed with this court, it is ORDERED that petitioner's brief and the appendix shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and respondent's brief shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 30, 31. (GP)
06/24/2008LETTER - from petitioner's counsel advising the court that parties have reached a settlement agreement
08/06/2008ORDER GRANT PTNR MOTION TO DISMISS/WITHDRAW APPEAL
08/06/2008DISMISSED
08/28/2008MANDATE ISSUED