Case Information: 06-AA-0126 | |||
Short Caption: | CORRINE JAMISON V. GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL | Classification: | Agency - Administrative Agency - Employment Services |
Superior Court or Agency Case Number: | ESP102948-05 | Filed Date: | 02/13/2006 |
| |||
Opening Event Date: | 02/13/2006 | Case Status: | Closed |
Record Completed: | 01/09/2007 | Post-Decision Matter Pending: | |
Briefs Completed: | |||
Argued/Submitted: | |||
Disposition: | Next Scheduled Action: | ||
Mandate Issued: | 04/20/2007 | ||
Costs Waived |
Party Information | ||||||||||||
Appellate Role | Party Name | IFP | Attorney(s) | Arguing Attorney | E-Filer | |||||||
Petitioner | Corrine Jamison | Y | Pro Se | N | ||||||||
Respondent | Geortown University Hospital | N |
|
Events | ||||
Event Date | Status | Description | Result | |
02/13/2006 | PETITION FOR REVIEW (nunc pro tunc) | |||
02/13/2006 | PETITIONER'S MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS | |||
02/17/2006 | ORDER GRANT PTNR MO TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, and the Clerk shall file the lodged petition for review nunc pro tunc to February 13, 2006. It is F/ORDERED that the Office of Administrative Hearings shall file the administrative record w/in 60 days from the date of this order. See D.C. App. R. 17. If a hearing was held, the record should include either a certified copy of the transcript of any testimony before the agency or a certified narrative statement of relevant proceedings and evidence in accordance with D.C. App. R. 16 (a)(4). It is F/O that Georgetown University Hospital shall w/in 15 days from the date of this order advise this court as to the identity of its counsel. See Moore Energy Resources, Inc. v. Public Serv. Comm'n of the District of Columbia. 785 A.2d 300, 304 (D.C. 2001); D.C. App. R. 15 (a)(5). (ETW) | |||
02/17/2006 | CERTIFIED COPY OF PETITION TO BOARD and Schwab. | |||
08/09/2006 | On consideration of this court's order of 2/17/06 directing respondent to identify its counsel within 15 days from the date of the order, and it appearing that respondent has failed to comply with the order, it is ORDERED that respondent shall within 10 calendar days from the date of this order advise this court as to the identity of its counsel. See Moore Energy Resources, Inc. v. Public Serv. Comm'n of the District of Columbia, 785 A.2d 300, 304 (D.C. 2001); D.C. App. R. 15(a)(5). Failure to comply with this order shall result in respondent being prohibited from filing its brief. (ETW) | |||
08/14/2006 | APPEARANCE- of Daniel M Creekman on behalf of respondent | |||
11/13/2006 | SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD#1 (1/10/06 of hearing of OAH) | |||
12/18/2006 | CHANGE OF ADDRESS RECEIVED Keith J. Harrison & Daniel M. Creekman 1001 Pennsylvania Ave., NW Washington, DC 20004 202 624-2560 | |||
01/09/2007 | RECORD ON APPEAL | |||
01/09/2007 | RECORD COMPLETED | |||
01/11/2007 | It appearing that the complete record on appeal has been filed with this court, it is ORDERED that petitioner's brief and the limited appendix, as required by D.C. App. R. 30(f), shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and respondent's brief shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 30, 31. (GP) | |||
02/23/2007 | On consideration of this court's order of January 11, 2007, directing petitioner to file the brief, and the limited appendix, as required by D.C.App. R. 30 (f), within 40 days from the date of the order, and it appearing that the brief and the appendix have not been filed, it is ORDERED that the brief of petitioner and the limited appendix shall be submitted within 20 days from the date of this order, accompanied by a motion for leave to file the documents out of time. The motion should set forth good cause for the failure either to timely file the documents or to request an extension of time within which to do so. Failure to comply with this order shall subject this petition for review to dismissal without further notice. See D.C. App. R. 13. (GP) | |||
03/28/2007 | On consideration of this court's order of February 23, 2007, directing petitioner to submit the brief and limited appenidx, accompanied by a motion for leave to file out of time, and it appearing that petitioenr has failed to comply with the order, it is ORDERED that this petition for review is hereby dismissed. See D.C. App. R. 13. (ETW) | |||
03/28/2007 | DISMISSED | |||
04/20/2007 | MANDATE ISSUED |