| Case Information: 35043 | |||
| Short Caption: | ACRI VS. PARROTT | Court: | Supreme Court |
| Lower Court Case(s): | Clark Co. - Eighth Judicial District - A398238 | Classification: | Civil Appeal - Family Law - Proper Person |
| Disqualifications: | Maupin | Case Status: | Remittitur Issued/Case Closed |
| Replacement: | Panel Assigned: | Panel | |
| To SP/Judge: | SP Status: | ||
| Oral Argument: | Oral Argument Location: | ||
| Submission Date: | 12/29/1999 | How Submitted: | On Record |
| + Party Information |
| Docket Entries | ||||
| Date | Type | Description | Pending? | Document |
| 11/02/1999 | Other | Disqualification of Justice Maupin. Law firm of Thorndal Armstrong Delk Balkenbush & Eisinger. | ||
| 11/02/1999 | Filing Fee | Received Filing Fee Paid on Filing. $200.00 from Mitchell Acri--check no. 3248. | ||
| 11/02/1999 | Notice of Appeal Documents | Filed Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal/Proper Person. Appeal docketed in the Supreme Court this day. | 99-10645 | |
| 12/16/1999 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order/Transmit Record and Directing Response. Original record due: 30 days. fn1--[The record shall not include any exhibits filed in the district court.] | 99-12730 | |
| 12/29/1999 | Record on Appeal Documents | Filed Record on Appeal. | 99-13375 | |
| 12/29/1999 | Case Status Update | Submitted for Decision. | ||
| 01/04/2002 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order. Order Directing Responses. fn1[Although listed in the caption, it is presently unclear whether Richard Johnson is in fact a party to this appeal.] fn9[Respondents shall not raise issues, which might arguably support affirmance of the orders of dismissal, that were not previously presented to and decided by the district court.] In addition to addressing the issues raised in appellant's opening brief, all respondents shall address whether Richard Johnson was actually a party to the proceeding on either July 20, 1999, or October 1, 1999 order. Respondents shall have 30 days from the date of this order to file and serve their respective response indicating why this court should affirm the district court orders. fn11[No extensions of time to file the responses shall be permitted absent extreme and unforeseeable circumstances.] | 02-00203 | |
| 02/07/2002 | Brief | Filed Answering Brief. Response to Order filed on 01/04/02. Mailed on: Fed Ex 02/06/02. Signed by: Philip Goodhart. | 02-02490 | |
| 02/07/2002 | Appendix | Filed Appendix to Answering Brief. | 02-02491 | |
| 02/14/2002 | Other | Other. Received Table of Contents to Respondent's Appendix filed on 02/07/02. Placed inside front cover of appendix. | ||
| 03/28/2002 | Order/Dispositional | Filed Dispositional Order/Appeal. Order Affirming in Part, Reversing in Part and Remanding. fn1[The clerk of this court shall amend the caption on this court's docket to conform to the caption on this order. Although previously listed in the caption on this court's docket, Richard Johnson has never been a party to this appeal.] "We vacate that portion of the district court order that granted the State of Oregon's NRCP 12(b)(2) motion, and remand for further proceedings consistent with our resolution of this appeal." fn13[We have considered all other arguments raised by Acri in his proper person brief, and have determined them to be without merit. Because we have considered appellant's proper person brief on the merits, we direct the clerk of this court to file the proper person brief received on January 18, 2000.] SNP02-CY/DA/ML | 02-05473 | |
| 03/28/2002 | Brief | Filed Proper Person Brief. Opening Brief. | 00-00780 | |
| 04/08/2002 | Filing Fee | Filing Fee due. | ||
| 04/08/2002 | Notice/Outgoing | Issued Notice to Pay Supreme Court Filing Fee. Rehearing. Due Date: 10 days | ||
| 05/23/2002 | Post-Judgment Order | Filed Order/Rehearing Denied. "Rehearing denied." fn1[NRAP 40( c). fn2[We grant Acri's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis with regard to the petition for rehearing. Acri is relieved of his obligation to pay the one hundred dollar NRAP 49(b)(4) filing fee. Although Acri was not granted leave to proceed in proper person, see NRAP 46(b), we have considered all other proper person documents file or received in this matter, and we conclude that the relief requested is not warranted.] SNP02-CY/DA/ML | 02-09126 | |
| 06/07/2002 | Remittitur | Issued Remittitur. Returned Record on Appeal this day. | 02-09473 | |
| 06/07/2002 | Case Status Update | Remittitur Issued/Case Closed. | ||
| 06/17/2002 | Remittitur | Filed Remittitur. Received by County Clerk on June 11, 2002. | 02-09473 | |
| 08/13/2002 | Other | Returned Unfiled Document. Returned, with letter, "Motion for Reconsideration in Proper Person-Revised." | ||