judyrecords
search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

Nevada Supreme/Appellate Court Record

BOHLMANN VS. PRINTZ

Case Information: 38550
Short Caption:BOHLMANN VS. PRINTZCourt:Supreme Court
Lower Court Case(s):Clark Co. - Eighth Judicial District - A344401Classification:Civil Appeal - General - Other
Disqualifications:MaupinCase Status:Remittitur Issued/Case Closed
Replacement:Panel Assigned: Panel
To SP/Judge:10/08/2001 / Dentico, MichaelSP Status:Completed
Oral Argument:Oral Argument Location:
Submission Date:05/04/2004How Submitted:On Briefs

+ Party Information

Docket Entries
DateTypeDescriptionPending?Document
10/01/2001OtherDisqualification of Justice Maupin. Law firm of Thorndal Armstrong Delk Balkenbush & Eisinger.
10/01/2001Filing FeeReceived Filing Fee Paid on Filing. $200.00 from Beckley Singleton--check no. 087832.
10/01/2001Notice of Appeal DocumentsFiled Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal/Settlement. Notice re: settlement conference program/suspension of rules mailed to all counsel. (Docketing statement mailed to counsel for appellant.) 01-16504
10/08/2001Settlement NoticeIssued Notice: Assignment to Settlement Program. Settlement Judge: Michael V. Dentico. (Briefing and preparation of transcripts suspended pending further order of this court.)
10/16/2001Filing FeeReceived Filing Fee Paid on Filing. $200.00 on cross-appeal from Thorndal Armstrong Delk Balkenbush & Eisinger--check no. 059243.
10/16/2001Notice of Appeal DocumentsFiled Certified Copy of Notice of Cross-Appeal. (Docketing statement mailed to counsel for cross-appellant.) 01-17495
10/18/2001Docketing StatementFiled Docketing Statement. Appellant/Cross-Respondent. 01-17588
10/19/2001Notice/Outgoing Letter. Michael V. Dentico.
12/18/2001Order/ProceduralFiled Order. The cross-appeal filed by respondents/cross-appellants (respondents) was docketed in this court on October 16, 2001. To date, respondents have failed to file the docketing statement. Respondents shall, within 10 days from the date of this order, file and serve the docketing statement. Failure to file a complete and accurate docketing statement in a timely manner may result in the imposition of sanctions. (Docketing statement mailed to the Thorndal firm, counsel for respondents/cross-appellants). 01-21318
12/31/2001Docketing StatementFiled Docketing Statement. Respondent/Cross-Appellant. (Copy of docketing statement mailed to settlement judge.) 01-21887
01/18/2002Settlement Program ReportFiled Interim Settlement Program Report. Settlement Judge recommends that this case be removed from the settlement program. 02-01319
01/29/2002Order/ProceduralFiled Order/Briefing Schedule. Pursuant to the written request of the settlement judge and good cause appearing, this appeal is removed from the settlement conference program. This court shall conduct a preliminary jurisdictional review of this appeal and cross-appeal. Appellant/cross-respondent and respondents/cross-appellants each: 15 days to comply with NRAP 9(a). Appellant/cross-respondent: 120 days to file and serve opening brief and appendix. Respondents/cross-appellants: 30 days thereafter to file and serve a combined answering brief on appeal and opening brief on cross-appeal. Appellant/cross-respondent: 30 days thereafter to file a combined reply brief on appeal and answering brief on cross-appeal. Respondents/cross-appellants: 30 days thereafter to file and serve a reply brief on cross-appeal. 02-01922
02/21/2002Transcript RequestFiled Certificate of No Transcript Request. 02-03326
04/01/2002Order/ProceduralFiled Order. Respondents/cross-appellants filed a certificate of no transcript on February 21, 2002. To date appellant/cross-respondent has failed to file either a transcript request form a certificate indicating that no transcripts are being requested. Appellant/cross-respondent shall, within 10 days of the date of this order, file and serve the required document. 02-05710
05/31/2002MotionFiled Motion and Order Extending Time. Brief due: June 28, 2002. 02-09561
07/01/2002MotionFiled Motion to Extend Time. (Second Request). 02-11271
07/05/2002Order/Clerk'sFiled Clerk's Order Granting Motion. filed July 1, 2002. Appellant/cross-respondent shall have until July 29, 2002, to file and serve the opening brief and appendix. 02-11429
07/12/2002Transcript RequestFiled Certificate of No Transcript Request. 02-11985
07/31/2002BriefFiled Opening Brief. Mailed on: 07/29/02. 02-13149
07/31/2002AppendixFiled Joint Appendix. 02-13150
08/26/2002MotionFiled Motion and Order Extending Time. Brief due: September 27, 2002. 02-14608
09/20/2002MotionFiled Motion to Extend Time. (Second Request) 02-16361
09/25/2002Order/ProceduralFiled Order Granting Motion. filed September 20, 2002. Respondents/cross-appellants shall have until October 28, 2002, to file and serve the combined answering brief on appeal and opening brief on cross-appeal. 02-16636
10/28/2002BriefFiled Answering Brief. Respondent/Cross-Appellant. Mailed on: Fed Ex 10/24/02. 02-18481
12/02/2002MotionFiled Stipulation and Order. Brief due: December 27, 2002. 02-20506
12/30/2002BriefFiled Reply Brief. Appellant/Cross-Respondent. Mailed on: 12/27/02. 02-22167
02/12/2003Case Status Update Briefing Completed. No reply brief on cross-appeal filed.
07/14/2003Order/ProceduralFiled Order/Show Cause. The parties shall have thirty days from the date of this order within which to show cause why their respective appeals should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. In responding to this order, the parties shall submit points, authorities, and any documentation that establishes this court's jurisdiction. We caution the parties that failure to demonstrate that this court has jurisdiction may result in the dismissal of these appeals. 03-11732
08/15/2003MotionFiled Response to Order to Show Cause. Response to Order to Show Cause and Request for Additional Time. 03-13656
08/27/2003Order/ProceduralFiled Order. Granting Request for Extension of Time. On July 14, 2003, we ordered the parties to demonstrate that this court has jurisdiction over these appeals. Appellant/cross-respondent Erwin Bohlmann responded and requested an additional 30 days in which to cure the apparent jurisdictional defect. Bohlmann shall have until September 12, 2003, to demonstrate to this court that he has perfected an appeal. If Bohlmann obtains an appealable written order from the district court, he must file a timely amended notice of appeal with the district court under NRAP 4(a)(1). Respondents/cross-appellants may also file any amended notice of appeal within the time frame of NRAP 4(a)(1). fn2[However, as noted in our order to show cause, it is not clear if this court has jurisdiction to review respondents/cross-appellants' cross-appeal, and we have received no response from respondents/cross-appellants.] 03-14404
09/15/2003MotionFiled Motion to Extend Time. to Order to Show Cause. (Appellant Bohlman) 03-15351
10/16/2003MotionFiled Motion to Extend Time. to Order to Show Cause. (Bohlman) 03-17243
11/05/2003MotionFiled Motion to Extend Time. Request for Extension of Time to File Opposition to Appellant's Third Request for Extension of Time to Respond to Order to Show Cause (First Request). 03-18418
11/10/2003Notice of Appeal DocumentsFiled Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal/Amended/Supplemental. 03-18779
12/10/2003Order/ProceduralFiled Order. Allowing Appeal to Proceed and Dismissing Cross-Appeal. On July 14, 2003, we ordered the parties to demonstrate that this court has jurisdiction over these appeals. On November 6, 2003, the district court filed an order confirming the arbitration award in favor of Ash. That same day, Bohlmann filed an amended notice of appeal. Because an order confirming an arbitration award is appealable, and Bohlmann filed a timely amended notice of appeal with the district court, he perfected his appeal. Although Bohlmann's alleged delay in filing a motion for relief in the district court is troubling, judicial economy militates in favor of granting Bohlmann's motions to extend time, and allowing this appeal to proceed. Regarding the cross-appeal, respondents/cross-appellants appealed from the 'part of the 'order' entered on September 7, 2001[,] which denied [Ash's] request for Attorney[ ] Fees and Rule 11 Sanctions related to [Bohlmann's] filing of Motion to Vacate Arbitration Award.' Because the district court did not formally resolve Ash's motion for sanctions in a written order, Ash's notice of appeal is premature and the cross-appeal is hereby dismissed. In sum, we grant Bohlmann's motions for a second and third extension of time filed in this court on September 15, 2003, and October 16, 2003, respectively, fn4[Ash's November 5, 2003, motion for an extension of time to oppose Bohlmann's third request for an extension of time is denied as moot.] and allow his appeal to proceed. We dismiss Ash's cross-appeal. 03-20562
12/10/2003Notice/OutgoingIssued Letter. to attorney Philip Goodhart. Returned unfiled, the original and one copy of the "Opposition to Appellant's Request for Additional Time to respond to Order to Show Cause (third request) received on November 3, 2003."
12/24/2003Other Returned Mail. Order filed 12/10/03 addressed to Michael Dentico ( Settlement Judge) returned unable to forward.
05/04/2004Order/ProceduralFiled Order/Submit on Briefs. Cause appearing, oral argument will not be scheduled and this appeal shall stand submitted for decision to the Northern Nevada Panel as of the date of this order on the briefs filed herein. 04-08169
05/04/2004Case Status Update Submitted for Decision. To the Northern Nevada Panel. NNP04-NB/DA/MG
09/13/2004Opinion/DispositionalFiled Per Curiam Opinion. "Affirmed." Before Becker, Agosti and Gibbons, JJ. Author: Per Curiam. 120 Nev. Adv. Opn. No. 62. NNP04 04-16677
10/08/2004RemittiturIssued Remittitur. 04-17129
10/08/2004Case Status Update Remittitur Issued/Case Closed.
10/21/2004RemittiturFiled Remittitur. Received by County Clerk on October 12, 2004. 04-17129