| Case Information: 38532 | |||
| Short Caption: | HITCHIN' POST VS. DISTRICT COURT (HARRAH) | Court: | Supreme Court |
| Lower Court Case(s): | Clark Co. - Eighth Judicial District - A413956 | Classification: | Original Proceeding - Civil - Mandamus |
| Disqualifications: | Case Status: | Notice in Lieu of Remittitur Issued/Case Closed | |
| Replacement: | Panel Assigned: | Panel | |
| To SP/Judge: | SP Status: | ||
| Oral Argument: | Oral Argument Location: | ||
| Submission Date: | How Submitted: | ||
| + Party Information |
| Docket Entries | ||||
| Date | Type | Description | Pending? | Document |
| 09/27/2001 | Filing Fee | Received Filing Fee Paid on Filing. $200.00 from Wieczorek & Associates--check no. 5109. | ||
| 09/27/2001 | Petition/Writ | Filed Petition for Writ of Mandamus. Filed Petition for Writ of Mandamus and Request for Immediate Stay. | 01-16298 | |
| 10/03/2001 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order/Answer Writ Petition. The real parties in interest, on behalf of respondents, shall have 30 days from the date of this order within which to file an answer, including authorities, against issuance of the requested writ. fn1[At this time, we defer ruling on petitioner's request for a stay of the district court proceedings.] | 01-16628 | |
| 11/14/2001 | Order/Dispositional | Filed Order Denying Petition. Denying Petition for Writ of Mandamus and directing Counsel to Show Cause. To date, the real parties in interest have not complied with our October 3, 2001 order. Notwithstanding the lack of an answer, we have reviewed the petition and we are not satisfied that this court's intervention is warranted. " . . . we deny the petition." Counsel for the real parties in interest, David J. Winterton, shall have 20 days from the date of this order to show cause why he should not be sanctioned for failing to timely comply with our October 3, 2001 order. fn2[We deny as moot petitioner's motion for a stay of the district court proceedings pending resolution of the writ petition.] NNP02-MS/RR/NB clerk1 | 01-19002 | |
| 11/15/2001 | Motion | Filed Motion to Extend Time. Motion for Extension to File Opposition (Answer to Petition). | 01-19086 | |
| 11/26/2001 | Motion | Filed Response to Order to Show Cause. Response to Order Dated November 14, 2001 re: Late Filing. | 01-19691 | |
| 12/11/2001 | Remittitur | Issued Notice in Lieu of Remittitur. | 01-19171 | |
| 12/11/2001 | Case Status Update | Remittitur Issued/Case Closed. | ||
| 11/20/2002 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order. We previously denied this petition for a writ of mandamus, even though we had ordered an answer from the real parties in interest and it appeared that no answer had been submitted. In light of the real parties in interest's submissions, we grant the motion to file a late answer and direct the clerk of this court to file the answer previously received. We conclude that sanctions are not warranted. As this court has previously denied the writ petition and the notice in lieu of remittitur has issued, no further action will be taken in this case. | 02-19993 | |
| 11/20/2002 | Petition/Writ | Filed Answer to Petition for Writ. Opposition to Petition for Writ of Mandamus and Request for Immediate Stay. | 01-18939 | |