judyrecords
search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

District Of Columbia Court Of Appeals Record

JAMES WILLIAMS V. CHANNEL INN HOTEL & PIER 7 RESTAURANT

Case Information: 10-AA-0230
Short Caption:JAMES WILLIAMS V. CHANNEL INN HOTEL & PIER 7 RESTAURANTClassification:Agency - Administrative Agency - Employment Services
Superior Court or Agency Case Number:DOES95-10Filed Date:03/03/2010

Opening Event Date:03/03/2010Case Status:Closed
Record Completed:Post-Decision Matter Pending:
Briefs Completed:
Argued/Submitted:
Disposition:Next Scheduled Action:
Mandate Issued:09/21/2010

Party Information
Appellate RoleParty NameIFPAttorney(s)Arguing AttorneyE-Filer
PetitionerJames Williams NPro SeN
RespondentChannel Inn Hotel & Pier 7 RestaurantN
Elizabeth Benton Fisher NN

Events
Event DateStatusDescriptionResult
03/03/2010PETITION FOR REVIEW (RECVD ONLY).
03/03/2010PETITIONER'S MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
03/12/2010ORDER GRANT PTNR MO TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, and the Clerk shall file the lodged petition for review nunc pro tunc to March 3, 2010. F/ORDERED that Office of Administrative Hearings shall file the record within 60 days from the date of this order. See D.C. App. R. 17. If a hearing was held, the record should include either a certified copy of the transcript of any testimony before the agency or a certified narrative statement of relevant proceedings and evidence in accordance with D.C. App. R. 16 (a)(4). FURTHER ORDERED that respondent shall within 30 days from the date of this order advise this court as to the identity of its counsel. See Moore Energy Resources, Inc. v. Public Serv. Comm'n of the District of Columbia, 785 A.2d 300, 304 (D.C. 2001); D.C. App. R. 15 (a)(5). (ETW)
04/14/2010 On consideration of this court's order of March 12, 2010, directing respondent to identify its counsel within 30 days from the date of the order, and it appearing that respondent has failed to comply with the order, it is ORDERED that respondent shall within 15 days from the date of this order advise this court as to the identity of its counsel. See Moore Energy Resources, Inc. v. Public Serv. Comm'n of the District of Columbia, 785 A.2d 300, 304 (D.C. 2001); D.C. App. R. 15 (a)(5). Failure to comply with this order shall result in respondent being prohibited from filing its brief. (GP)
04/28/2010APPEARANCE - of Elizabeth Benton Fisher as counsel for the respondent
08/03/2010ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT MOTION TO REMAND (D.C.) ORDERED that the motion is granted and the orders on review are hereby vacated and the matters remanded to the agency for further action consistent with the motion. It is F/O that the Clerk shall issue the mandates forthwith. (ISR)
08/03/2010REMANDED
09/21/2010MANDATE ISSUED
04/21/2014FiledArchived