judyrecords
search tips
750 million+
United States Court Cases

District Of Columbia Court Of Appeals Record

KEVIN A. AJENIFUJA V. VIRILION, INC., ET AL

Case Information: 08-CV-0559
Short Caption:KEVIN A. AJENIFUJA V. VIRILION, INC., ET ALClassification:Appeals - Civil - Contracts
Superior Court or Agency Case Number:CAB210-08Filed Date:04/28/2008

Opening Event Date:04/28/2008Case Status:Closed
Record Completed:08/21/2008Post-Decision Matter Pending:
Briefs Completed:
Argued/Submitted:
Disposition:Next Scheduled Action:
Mandate Issued:11/05/2008

Party Information
Appellate RoleParty NameIFPAttorney(s)Arguing AttorneyE-Filer
AppellantKevin A. Ajenifuja N
Anita Ajenifuja NN
AppelleeVirilion Inc.N
Alan S. BlockNY
Lindsy A. Lewis NN
AppelleeDaniel Solomon N
John D. Mason NN
Alan S. BlockNY
Lindsy A. Lewis NN
AppelleeShabbir Safdar N
John D. Mason NN
Alan S. BlockNY
Lindsy A. Lewis NN
AppelleeHuard G. Smith N
John D. Mason NN
Alan S. BlockNY
Lindsy A. Lewis NN

Events
Event DateStatusDescriptionResult
04/28/2008NOTICE OF APPEAL
06/02/2008 On consideration of the notice of appeal filed in this case and it appearing that this appeal meets the initial criteria for inclusion in the mandatory mediation program, See Administrative Order M229-07, it is ORDERED that appellant must within 20 days from the date of this order complete and file with this court a single copy of the attached statement regarding transcript. Motions for extensions of time to file this form must give specific reasons for a short extension and are not looked upon favorably. Where transcript(s) necessary for this appeal have been ordered and completed for non-appeal purposes, appellant must advise the Court Reporting Division to forward those transcript(s) for inclusion in the record on appeal. If partial transcripts are being ordered, appellant must file a statement of issues to be presented with this court within 10 calendar days from the date of this order. See D.C. App. R. 10(b)(3)(A). It is F/ORDERED that counsel for all parties must, within 20 days from the date of this order, individually complete and file with this court two (2) copies of the attached screening statement. Motions for extensions of time to file this form must give specific reasons for a short extension and are not looked upon favorably. If after review of all information the case is selected for inclusion in the mandatory mediation program, counsel will be contacted by the Senior Judge assigned as mediator and must comply with all provisions of administrative order M229-07. If the case is not selected, the appeal will proceed without any delay. It is FURTHER ORDERED that failure of the parties to comply with this order may result in the imposition of sanctions. (GP) elp
06/20/2008CIVIL APPEALS SCREENING STATEMENT (Aple)
06/26/2008 On consideration of this court's order of June 2, 2008, which directed counsel for appellant to file the statement regarding trancript, and counsel for all parties to file the individual screening statement, and it appearing that appellant has failed to comply with the order, it is ORDERED that counsel for appellant shall within 10 calendar days from the date of this order submit the statement regarding transcript, and two (2) copies of the attached screening statement, accompanied by a motion for leave to file out of time. The motion should set forth good cause for the failure either to timely file the documents or to request an extension of time within which to do so. Failure to comply with this order shall subject this appeal to dismissal without further notice. See D.C. App. R. 13. (GP) elp
06/27/2008RECEIVED Civil Appeal Screening Statement and Statement regarding Transcript.
07/01/2008MOT TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE STMT RE TRANSCRIPT and civil appeal statement
07/01/2008RECEIVED - aplt's statement regarding transcripts and civil appeals screening statement
07/14/2008APPELLEE'S OPPOSITION to aplt's mot for ext of time.
07/17/2008APPELLEE'S MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION to attach exhibit A to aple's oppo to aplt's mot for ext of time.
07/22/2008APPELLANT'S REPLY - to aple's oppo. to motion for extension of time to statement regarding transcript and civil screening statement
07/23/2008SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD #1 (12-pgs/tape 4/18/08 proc.)
07/31/2008 On consideration of appellant's motion for leave to file the lodged statement regarding transcript and screening statement, the opposition and reply thereto, and appellee's motion for leave to file the lodged exhibit to appellee's opposition to appellant's motion for extension of time to which no opposition has been filed, it is ORDERED that appellee's motion to attach the exhibit to its opposition is granted. It is (MORE)
07/31/2008 FURTHER ORDERED that appellant's motion is granted and the Clerk shall file the lodged statement regarding transcript and the screening statement. (MWF) elp
07/31/2008STATEMENT REGARDING TRANSCRIPT(S) (RT-NEEDED/RT-ORDERED for 4/18/08)
07/31/2008CIVIL APPEALS SCREENING STATEMENT (APPELLANT)
08/19/2008NO MEDIATION
08/21/2008RECORD INDEX
08/21/2008RECORD COMPLETED
08/22/2008 It appearing that the complete record on appeal has been filed with this court, and it further appearing that the court did not direct this matter to mediation, it is ORDERED that appellant's brief and the appendix including the documents required by D.C. App. R. 30 (a)(1), shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and appellees' brief shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 31. (GP) elp
09/15/2008NOTICE OF WITHDRAWL OF CO-COUNSEL LW
09/16/2008APPEARANCE - of Lindsey Lewis on behalf of aple
09/23/2008APPELLEE'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY AFFIRMANCE
09/24/2008TMC - appellee's motion to withdraw as counsel - motion for summary affirmance - opposition AND CROSS motion for reversal - opposition to reversal and reply
09/30/2008MISCELLANEOUS- aple's disclosure statement
09/30/2008APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY REVERSAL- cross and opposition to summary affirmance
10/08/2008APPELLEE'S OPPOSITION- to aplt's cross motion for summary reversal and reply to aplt's oppo to aple's motion for summary affirmance
10/14/2008 ORDERED, SS, that the APPEAL IS DISMISSED as having been taken from a NON-APPEALABLE ORDER. D.C. Code 16-4317. See also Umana v. Swidler, 669 A.2d 717, 721 (d.c. 1995). However the trial court is directed to the requirement that the complaint should be stayed, not dismissed pending resolution of the arbitration. See D.C. Code 16-4302(d);...It is *****MORE*******
10/14/2008 FURTHER ORDERED that appellees' MOTION FOR SUMMARY AFFIRMANCE and appellant's MOTION FOR SUMMARY REVERSAL ARE DENIED AS MOOT. (BRFAPR)
10/14/2008DISMISSED
11/05/2008MANDATE ISSUED